Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Proletarians and bourgeoisie
Bourgeoisie v proletariat
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Proletarians and bourgeoisie
Bourgeoisie v proletariat
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The article “The Noble Feat of Nike” by Johan Norberg talks about how Nike is gaining numerous benefits because of its location in a Third World communist country, Vietnam. Majority factory workers have endured extreme conditions in life, which is why they do not demand or expect too high, unlike Americans who would not accept such circumstances without increased wages. Nike has been providing factory workers with favorable wages, education, medical aid, and meals, but all this is only possible because Nike has always targeted a poor country. Indirectly, Nike not only obtains money through making quality gym shoes, but also through investing in poor country and earning extra dollars. Furthermore, this article also shows statistics on how Nike has improved, within a decade by saying that $54 a month of income leads to workers buying a bicycle after 2 years; otherwise every individual has to walk several miles a day.
Behind the Swoosh is a documentary about sweatshop labor. As a class we watched the documentary and as I learned more about how Nike was running their business; I felt bad for the people that were working. I could not believe that those people were working hard making that company so much money and was getting nothing in return. Then again, I really was not shocked because I know that they are people that put a lot of blood, sweat and tears into a company and do not make enough money.
Karl Marx’s Communistic View The differences between bourgeoisie and proletariat, according to Karl Marx, was that the bourgeoisie owned property and controlled all aspects of the society and proletariats owned nothing and were wage-laborers that sold their labor for a wage. The terms bourgeoisie and proletariat do exist in the American society with slightly different terms and variations. The bourgeoisie would represent the upper class of American society; these individuals own property, businesses, and comprise a small majority of the population, much like the bourgeoisie. The proletariat would be representative of the middle and lower classes of the United States; however, the difference here is that the middle and lower class citizens
this idea through the creation of “religious and political illusions” to keep the working classes below them. Through the creation of these religious ideas and political ideologies the bourgeois formed the proletariat class, which happens to be the majority of the world. The proletariat class is viewed by the bourgeois as a group of inferiors laboring to gain a small percentage of capital to survive within the unfair society built by the bourgeois. Since the proletariat are forced to work for the bourgeois in order to survive they are only aiding the bourgeois in their quest of self-interest to expand their wealth, land ownership and political power. But as the modern bourgeois continue to modernize ways of producing goods through machines the pay wages of the proletariat workers will decrease because manual labor is no longer needed.
David Montero explains that in Sialkot, Pakistan there is a business, Saga Sports, that creates the Nike soccer balls by hand, the problem Nike has with the company is that they employ children to work in unjust conditions. “In November, Nike severed its contract with Saga Sports, its chief supplier, saying Saga's poor management exposes Nike to the threat of child labor and other labor violations,” (Montero). The chief executive of Nike is trying to reduce the amount of children that produce their goods in unfair conditions. The executive wants consumers to know that they are buying products that were manufactured the proper way of not having children make these items in appalling conditions that could threaten their health. The evidence suggest that working conditions is another reason that the United States consumers should not buy products that are made by
He found that capitalism, an economic system which deals with the production of goods and services, was dividing the population into two major classes: 1. The bourgeoisie – owners of property and factories. 2. The proletariat – people who provided labour which was necessary to operate factories and productive enterprises.
UNETHICAL BUSINESS CASE STUDY ON NIKE Summary This project is focused onthe unethical behaviors of Nike. The essay will be exploring the ethical situation of Nike, the unethical behaviors, as well as the company’s role in reducing and correcting its unethical issues. Nike is no doubt one of the world’s leading footwear and apparel company, but continues to outsource its manufacturing to factories in Asian countries like China, Thailand, Bangladesh, India, and South Korea.
Additionally, Nike Inc. entered a globalized market because the organization had a solid financial base that could support its factories abroad. Though critics argued that Nike implemented a cheap labor policy to manufacture its products, nevertheless, without a stable financial base, it would have been difficult to globalize the organization. In a related development, Nike’s presence in the globalized market encourages a massive inequality in the society. While suppliers were much better off, the laborers were worse off and the organization looks the other way because it was part of doing a business in the globalized market. So, it is fair to say that entering a global market costs
Her teary apology and activism makes it a national issue. • 1996: Nike establishes a department tasked with working to improve the lives of factory laborers. • 1997: Efforts at promotion become occasions for public outrage.
Karl Marx talks about the role of communism and his conjecture of underlying this type of revolution. He speaks of two different class struggles, the "Bourgeoisie and Proletarians". Bourgeoisie are the people with authority, the ones who own production and are bosses of wage labor while the proletariat are the individuals with no authority, no ownership and are giving up their own power to the Bourgeoisie in order to survive. Societies began to separate and became hostile and aggressive classes. It all became about social ranking because of the increase and need of production.
Nike provided a clear lesson on how supply chain ethics are made visible and can impact a brand. Nike initially had hyper-growth in the 1970’s and early 1980’s. At this time, Nike outsourced the assembly of it’s products to third parties in Asia in order to both drive efficiency and lower labour costs. When asked about their questionable business practices with some of these third-parties, Nike publicly stated that they couldn’t be expected to be responsible for the practices of its suppliers. This statement led to national media and activist groups sharpening their focus on the business practices of Nike suppliers and by extension Nike.
Nike moves its factories to Indonesia, Vietnam, and China, when the cost in Japan became expensive. And the source of crisis is the working condition in these factories because of the accusation of poor condition, child labor, and widespread harassment
There were several consumer and labor groups that boycotted and protested against Nike products some leading to cancellation of Nike orders. In the end, the reports seriously and negatively impacted both Nike’s profitability and corporate image. Nike 's response Strategy As a result of this criticism in relation to the bad working conditions and low labor compensation, Nike established labor policies and rules that created work standards similar to American condition and agreed to equally compensate their workers. These new regulations and standards were later adopted by other manufacturing companies within the same nations or regions like Asia and Indonesia.
This is due to Nike gets its merchandise generally from foreign manufacturers. To operate profitably, Nike need to get good value on products and supplies and, in turn, offer good value to its customers with accessible solutions. Publics: Many colleges and universities, especially anti-globalization groups as well as several anti-sweatshop groups
Karl Marx (1818-1883) considered himself not to be a sociologist but a political activist. However, many would disagree and in the view of Hughes (1986), he was ‘both – and a philosopher, historian, economist, and a political scientist as well.’ Much of the work of Marx was political and economic but his main focus was on class conflict and how this led to the rise of capitalism. While nowadays, when people hear the word “communism”, they think of the dictatorial rule of Stalin and the horrific stories of life in a communist state such as the Soviet Union, it is important not to accuse Marx of the deeds carried out in his name.