ipl-logo

Propaganda 70: The Statesmanship Style Of Leadership

1201 Words5 Pages

The way in which a leader selects their style of leadership is predominantly motivated by their underlying priorities and motives concerning the position at hand. These priorities are linked to the goals that the leader themselves wishes to accomplish in their position, but are often influenced by a variety of factors that are derived from two main concerns, the overall well-being of the institution under the leader’s administration and the approval of the people within that institution. The relationship between public approval and the well-being of the institution is often dichotomous in nature, which results in the leader having to make decisions that gravitate towards one side of the spectrum. This conflict between what is good for the institution …show more content…

In the scope of government, this style of leadership can be referred to as statesmanship. In Federalist 70, Publius calls for a strong executive in order to provide the robust energy needed to maintain the republic. A strong executive can prioritize the country itself over the law of the country, thus going against popular and accepted opinion to do what is best for the country. This behavior of putting the country’s needs over the desires of the public is the key aspect in the statesmanship style of leadership. Furthermore, the statesman is more focused on the long-term impacts that their decisions will make on the institution rather than the immediate satisfaction of the public because the well-being and longevity of the institution is prioritized over what the public desires. This form of leadership requires a different view of the elected executive in the sense that, unlike the popular leader, the statesman is not a tool to execute the desires of the public, rather they are elected with the assumption from the voters that they are to make decisions using their discretion for the betterment of the state regardless of what the voters want. This can be an effective style of governing because often the public’s desires do not align with what is best for the country because a great majority do not possess the experience or knowledge that is required to successfully govern an entire country. The strong executive Publius calls for in Federalist 70 cannot be influenced by public opinion too heavily because that would inhibit their ability to exercise the required executive energy. A truly strong and energetic leader is one who can overlook the desires of the public to do what is right for the country

Show More
Related
487 Words | 2 Pages

In “Federalist No. 69”, Alexander Hamilton wrote to inform and persuade the public to agree to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Particularly, he focused on the executive leadership’s role in the new government. He described the number of years the President can serve for before he is eligible for reelection. The President’s conduct and actions regarding legal matters are described as not being above the law. Law-making checks are imposed on the President as the two houses carry a large say.

Read More
854 Words | 4 Pages

Edward Mitchell 10/22/2016 English 10 Essay Unit 1 Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson played a large role in motivating the fight toward freedom in the weeks leading up to the Revolutionary War and immediately following it. Each believed in the fundamental right to be free from rule. Patrick Henry appealed to the people’s fear of war. Thomas Jefferson was able to convince people that together, they could form a new nation. The writings of each man reveals a very chaotic time in America’s history and the leadership, determination, and boldness of Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson ensured that when change came, the people were ready for it.

Read More
673 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, there is no threat to aristocracy in this nation. In cities and towns, there is, however, a constant threat of a rebellion and the only way to fix this issue is to give the people what they want: a new constitution. Not only will the constitution satisfy the citizens but it will also give power to the national government to accomplish the goals of a functioning nation. The new government will represent the states and create a strong nation that will strive for greatness. The national government provides a structure for the citizens to have a say in the nation’s direction through the voting process.

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

Seth Marshall Professor: Messersmith Comp 2 2/22/16 Different Leadership Styles All people have different opinions on how a leader should handle things. Such as war, people, poverty, and even themselves. Both Machiavelli in “The qualities of the prince” talks about on how a prince is supposed to be a leader and that good leaders must learn not to be convenient or compassionate to keep stability. Lao Tzu in “Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching” believes in having a silent leader so the people will do what he wants them to do and fill like they are not being guided.

Read More
1265 Words | 6 Pages

Prior to the ratification of the United States Constitution, a series of eighty-five essays, later compiled and published as The Federalist Papers, were written under the joint pseudonym “Publius” by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. In these essays, the three men expressed support for ratification by explaining the meaning and virtues of the Constitution (Brinkley, 139). Although, it did not receive such fame until the early twentieth-century, Madison’s Federalist No. 10 has since been regarded as one of the more prominent Federalist papers (Adair, 48). In it, Madison presents the argument that the new republican government under the Constitution would be better able to deal with the problems that arise from factions. This paper

Read More
1635 Words | 7 Pages

This form of government did not contain a complexly balanced, strong, and independent executive.” This was the exact form of government many revolutionaries wanted; a government where the majority of the power rested with the people, instead of one overpowering

Read More
1677 Words | 7 Pages

The Primary objective of all leaders should be to control citizens. A society that allows authority to be challenged will never succeed. This source depicts an authoritarian or totalitarian view of what a governing body should look like. The author suggests that the primary objective of government should be the “control of the citizens”, and therefore that the individuals should entirely obey said government.

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

“Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” After taking office in 1789, George Washington proved to be one of the best US presidents by providing strong leadership and setting precedents for future presidents, laying the seeds for US prosperity as a country and democracy. President Washington set the role of the executive branch in order to have a limited government that would protect the citizens’ rights. By proving that the government would act firmly in times of crisis, Washington showed Americans the strong powers of the national government, only used to maintain peace, liberty, and economic prosperity.

Read More
638 Words | 3 Pages

Numerous thoughts were proposed amid the drafting of the constitution however maybe none as vital as that of balanced governance. This thought is exemplified in James Madison's The Federalist. He additionally does this by demonstrating that the legislature must have fundamental measures to control itself. Both of the thoughts he bolsters in his paper show that he was an extraordinary supporter of the endorsement of

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

3). He also advocates that the very nature of a constitutional government, though it does give power to only a few bodies, ultimately rests on the authority of the people. Because, in order for the different departments of government to operate correctly, they must be separate from any of the other departments; he states that the only way to achieve this is by nature of the people

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

“It is no longer a government of the people, by the people and for the people,” said Populist leader Mary Elizabeth Lease. She felt that not only the government, but society as a whole was failing to live up to what the founders had in mind for America. The country had entered a period of reform, and one could only hope to end up on the right side of it at the end. It was old principles battling the idea of new solutions.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

The definitions of leadership appearing in the first three decades of the 20th century emphasized control and centralization of power (Northouse, 2016, p.2). In the early 1900s research began to see if leaders possessed certain traits or characteristics that would distinguish

Read More
1924 Words | 8 Pages

Leadership Analysis Introduction One of the popular definitions of a leader is, "The only definition of a leader is someone who has followers." ( ) A more comprehensive definition that highlights striking features of a leader is, "A simple definition of leadership is that leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal.” ( ) A closer scrutiny of the characteristics of an influential leader would many ways assist one, in recognizing those attributes in an attempt to assimilate the best in others.

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

In developing this paper on leadership, I examined what was most important to me as a leader. As I reflected on my leadership philosophy, I thought about my experiences and the principals that I have learned through my own self-discovery and the observation of other leaders that I have had throughout my life. My leadership philosophy paper will focus on what leadership is to me, core values, and knowledge of others. In thinking about my definition of leadership, I thought of what was most important to me in and as a leader.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

1 INTRODUCTION Power and authority are the most important aspects of politics as such way of thinking comes a long way from the earliest thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle to mention few. They are the fundamental features of state in politics, focusing on who should have the power and authority over the people and who should rule them. During the time prior and after the birth of states, political authority has always been a major concern with regards to who should rule and how and who shouldn’t. Therefore this issues need to be addressed in a way that will at the end benefit the society. Plato is the thinker or theorist who came with addressing who should rule in a political environment in what Plato outlined that only Philosophers should rule.

Read More

More about Propaganda 70: The Statesmanship Style Of Leadership

Related Topics

Open Document