ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Death Penalty

1252 Words6 Pages

I rise today to speak with grave concern about the aspects of the United States death penalty. There are five different forms of execution in the United States: hanging, electrocution, lethal injection, lethal gas, and firing squad. I believe that all of these should be legal in order to sustain justice. “If we show mercy to the guilty, we are only showing cruelty to the innocent.” Why should we abolish the death penalty if someone harms or kills another person? Doesn’t justice demand that the killer loses his life? He should expect that hasn’t been the case.
In 2008, Jodi Arias killed her boy-friend, Travis Alexander, but Arias claimed it was self-defense. Travis suffered nearly 30 knife wounds, had his throat slit and was shot in the head. …show more content…

They are even given short sentences for violent crimes, and after a short sentence, they are released, free to pursue their violent obsessions on the sanity of the human race. There is no cure. People who commit a violent crime will do it over and over again, no matter if/how you medicate or treat them. If you give a pedophile or a murderer medication, they will find other ways to commit these awful acts. If you cut off the hands of a thief, they will steal again. There is no permanent cure for them. We are born sinners; Beautiful but broken, sinful people, doomed to do evil things. We, “the sane”, are their victims. We, “the sane”, are targets. We, “the sane”, are the only ones who can stop them; “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth;” In this case, a life for a life. For this reason we must use the death penalty on all violent criminals, murderers, pedophiles, rapists, and sadists. “But if a man meets a young woman, and the man seizes her and lies with her, then only the man who lay with her shall die. But you shall do nothing to the young woman; she has committed no offense punishable by …show more content…

It was argued that death simply does not teach a lesson to criminals and that it is inhumane. It is also argued that the death penalty is not fair for criminals to die quick, no matter what they did and that the criminals should just be punished. Some also argue that Illinois should have abolished the death penalty anyways because using violence on violent criminals is contradictory in terms. Killing criminals doesn't solve the problem; it just makes those in the justice system heavy handed, but if a criminal has performed a nefarious, violent action and is proven guilty, then there is no use spending precious resources to keep him alive. Society needs protection from him, not for him. Without the death penalty, someone can kill 3 people or even 50 people like the Colorado shooting for instance. Still the worse that happens to them is life in prison. That isn’t

Show More
Related
677 Words | 3 Pages

While there are far more subjects to discuss regarding to this issue, I feel it necessary to state that I believe the death penalty should exist in a perfect society. I believe that certain crimes and certain situations warrant the punishment of death. However, the our society is not perfect. The justice system has failed to fairly use this punishment in far too many instances, and concludes that they cannot justly wield this

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

The US Supreme Court’s decision on the abolition of capital punishment was correct because capital punishment violates the eighth and fourteenth amendments, provides no evidence of deterioration of crime rates, and falls unequally on society. Violates Eighth Amendment:

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Capital punishment is typically considered as a human way to approach to kill the most wickedness criminals and to discourage others from carrying out intolerable crimes. However, the unrestrained expenses of capital punishment cases have states thinking about whether it's justified regardless of the price tag. The lethal established ailment in the discipline of death is that it treats 'individuals from mankind as nonhumans, as articles to be toyed with and disposed of. It is along these lines conflicting with the essential reason of the Clause that even the most awful criminal remains a person had of normal human respect.

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

Even though the death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriage of justice, death penalty should be allowed because it provides comfort to the victim's family, it deters crime, and you know the criminal will never hurt anyone again. Even though the death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriages of justice, Death penalty should be allowed because it provides comfort to the victim's family. Family and friends of the victims should never have to worry about parole or a slight chance of that same criminal escaping. Knowing that that one person

Read More
1072 Words | 5 Pages

A question we need to ask ourselves and our judicial system is if we should be able to kill, and who deserves the power to make that decision? Throughout history in America, our judicial system has always used retributive justice as a way to condemn crime and give out punishment. Retributive justice is a system that focuses on punishing the offender rather than preventing and rehabilitating. This way of dealing with crime has only harmed the people involved and created more problems like poverty, and unjust cases, and makes it harder for convicts to live life in the future. The book ‘Just Mercy’ written by Bryan Stevenson covers these issues that thousands of Americans face, even today.

Read More
1841 Words | 8 Pages

Whether a criminal is guilty of committing murder or any other capital offense, they should all be given the same sentence - life in prison. How is it fair to allow them to voluntarily choose the death penalty over prison? Criminals willingly sought to break the law and should endure the lifelong debt they owe not only to society but to the family of the innocent victims whose lives have been taken. As asserted by Robert Johnson, a professor of justice and law, and Sandra Smith, a professor of legal studies, death by incarceration is a more effective and suitable form of punishment than the death penalty (Cromie and Zott 174). Although some might argue that it is unfair to keep a criminal alive, they fail to understand that the freedom they once had is permanently lost.

Read More
1714 Words | 7 Pages

Experience Humanities described the cannon as “a set of principles or rules that are accepted as true…in religion, the approved and authoritative writings are accepted as divinely inspired, such as the scriptures for Jews and Christians; and in religious and other contexts, certain prescribed rituals or official rules and laws” (Noble, Matthew, Platt 666). Christians believe in the bible, the Jews believe in the Tanakh, and the Muslims believe in the Qu’ ran. In order to understand a religion, one must understand the origin, the context, and the meanings laying in the book. The Jews are people group, they do not consider themselves as a race, but as a family. The core of their belief, Judaism, is about relationships: the connection between

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

For the victim's families, it may not feel good enough to just be living a life in prison or in some cases even being let back into society. And the death sentence

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

This is definitely the best definition of justice that has ever existed or ever will exist. Listed above are some reasons found that America should oppose the death penalty alongside of personal views on summarizing what the information means, this should be an eye opener for many. First, to speak

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

In recent years, anti-death penalty propagandists have succeeded in stoking the fear that capital punishment is being carelessly meted out. Ironically, Of the 875 prisoners executed in the United States in modern times, not one has been retroactively proved innocent. The benefits of a legal system in which judges and juries have the option of sentencing the cruelest or coldest murderers to death far outweigh the potential risk of executing an innocent person. First and foremost, the death penalty makes it possible for justice to be done to those who commit the worst of all crimes. The execution of a murderer sends a powerful moral message: that the innocent life he took was so precious, and the crime he committed so horrific, that he forfeits

Read More
81 Words | 1 Pages

Some see the death penalty as the only means to extract justice for victims. Others see it as a morally reprehensible act where a second wrong is committed in order to make something right. With recent issues surrounding the death penalty in which execution hasn 't gone as planned sparking a nationwide debate, this is my outlook on why I 'm for the death penalty not only being abolished in the state of Texas but in addition to the entirety of the US..

Read More
1499 Words | 6 Pages

Deadly Justice For most of recorded history, the death penalty has been regarded as a barbaric and brutal form of punishment. The United States Federal Government should outlaw the use of the death penalty. Eliminating the death penalty is justified because it does not deter crime; it generates higher expenses, violates human rights, and puts innocent lives at risk. Death penalty does not prevent crime; delinquency rates are usually higher in states with the death penalty.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

Although the death penalty may bring some closure to families of the victims and even the victims themselves it still should be abolished because the negatives outweigh the positives. People could be murdered by the state even if they are innocent. They are taking away any chance these people have at a normal life even though it's a life that they deserve and did nothing to have it taken away. 6. Conclusion

Read More
1208 Words | 5 Pages

Some states are using murder to punish someone who committed murder. We need to move on past the “eye for an eye” mentality. Killing the criminal does not change the fact that the victim is not coming back to life and capital punishment will not cure the hurt that the victim’s family or friends feel. Trying to get back at someone who is your enemy, usually makes the situation worse. Death is also the easy way out for someone who committed a crime.

Read More
1320 Words | 6 Pages

The major reason why the death penalty should be abolished is that the cost of the death penalty is too much and the USA is in debt to many other countries. What this means is that the death penalty should be abolished and also the cost death penalty is more than the cost of maximum sentence life in prison. According to J. Marceau and H. Whitson, “The Cost of Colorado’s Death penalty,” 3 Univ. of Denver Criminal Law Review “A new study of the cost of the death penalty in Colorado revealed that capital proceedings require six times more days in court and

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Death Penalty

Related Topics

Open Document