Should The Federal Government Outlaw The Use Of The Death Penalty

Deadly Justice For most of recorded history, the death penalty has been regarded as a barbaric and brutal form of punishment. The United States Federal Government should outlaw the use of the death penalty. Eliminating the death penalty is justified because it does not deter crime; it generates higher expenses, violates human rights, and puts innocent lives at risk. Death penalty does not prevent crime; delinquency rates are usually higher in states with the death penalty. In addition, capital punishment is much more expensive than life in prison. Death row infringes on a person’s right to life. About 108 people in 25 states have been proven innocent after they were out to death sentence. Thus, an ethical judicial system should be concerned

In fact, states that perform the death penalty have higher murder rates than states that do not have a death sentence statute. As of now, there are 18 states that have outlawed death row. Those states have the least amount of murder rate ranking lower than average. The Times magazine discovered that in past 20 years, states with the death sentence have ranked crime rate 48 percent to 101 percent higher than in states that have the form of punishment banned. The 18 states that have not enacted to the death penalty believe that abolishing it was the best alternative. "I think Michigan made a wise decision 150 years ago," claims John Engler, the state governor. Michigan prohibited the death penalty in 1846 and has withstood any kind of attempts to reestablish it. As it’s known, the majority of convicts who have been sentenced to death penalty have executed their crimes due to mental instability or under the effects of narcotics and alcohol. This portrays a category of people who are impotent of making any logical choice due to their lack of self- control. The death Penalty will never stop a convict from committing a felony because they don’t see death sentence as a possible consequence for their

Some people believe death penalty should be used as a punishment for taking a life. They argue that it is deterrent and reduces crime. Other people believe that some criminals will never change. If a criminal slaughtered twenty people without any logical reason chances they will execute the same crime again. No cell time will change that. To them, death penalty is not murder but is rather a justified punishment for someone that has committed a crime. “May the punishment fit the crime.” is one of the most fitting meanings for justice. An inclination for justice is one of the most inborn attributes of most humans. For the purpose of stability of this constitution fairness and morality must always subsist and the removal of these criminals who violate safety is required. Those who reinforce death sentence comprehend that there is no better form of punishment than death