Pros And Cons Of Albert Parsons

346 Words2 Pages
Based on the documents, Albert Parsons was most certainly not a threatening man. In document A, a testimony given by Albert Parsons himself, it asserts that he was an advocate for preferable work conditions by soliciting the people of the congress to change them for the convenience of the labor workers. Parsons ensures that his intentions were not to stimulate a revolution nor be the cause of anarchy in the area, but simply amend the work environment (Document A). This evidence suggests that Parsons was not only petitioning a change in a conciliatory manner but was simply trying to benefit and help the workers by wanting to upgrade their work conditions under a non illicit procedure. Furthermore, as it can be seen in document B, an article