ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Animal Research

966 Words4 Pages

all of the sick individuals that it helps because the act of utilizing non-humans in research does the most good for the most people (Lyons, 2001). Protesters are also considered stakeholders due to the fact that they are usually advocating animal sentience and their rights to live naturally, and not in a laboratory setting. Typically, protestors often have an issue concerning this dilemma due to their own ignorance. Unfortunately, this ignorance usually centers on misinformation obtained from the internet, their own imaginations, and the fact that they do not believe that animal research is necessary. Due to their position of ignorance, a protestor cannot present fair scientific data unless they have actually experienced the animal research …show more content…

There is a process known as the 3D printing of organs and tissue systems, where a machine utilizes human cells and creates a living (to an extent) copy of what it is programmed to create. If the research studies were able to afford and acquire this fairly new technology, they would be able to print a replica of the human system and attach it to a machine to simulate life (Cheluvappa, Scowen, Eri, 2017). Utilizing 3D printed organ systems has several pros; there would be no need to use animal lives and the replicas would be of human origin, ensuring that the test subject would be more realistic in treatment studies. There are also cons, as there are with just about anything. It is new, which means that it is incredibly expensive and researchers would need to be able to afford buying the technology as well as all of the maintenance required for it to remain functional. Also, there may also be opposition from the masses for creating a version of life that only has the purpose to be operated on. Despite the cons, 3D printed tissues would be a much more effective alternative to animal testing, we as a people would be able to completely embody beneficence, or that of doing good (or at least not doing harm), because there would be an effective alternative (Kohl, 2001). To prove that this is also a better investment in medical research, data could be collected on similar studies done on both animal subjects and the 3D printed ones to ensure that it is more efficient and

Show More
Related
1322 Words | 6 Pages

Despite why the congressional recommendations suddenly disappeared, the scientific community is granted much sway over acquiring tissue which may well be considered unscrupulous. Even some of the leading scientist want people to have the ability to know and choose how their tissue is being used. “Ellen Wright Clayton, a physician who is director of the center for biomedical Ethics and Society at Vanderbilt University, says there needs to be a “very public conversation” about all of this …if the issue were stated that bluntly so people could really understand what’s happening and say there okay with it, that would make me more comfortable with what we’re currently doing.” (page 320). This quote indicates scientist are aware certain studies conducted may be contrary to one

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

The novel delves into the ethical implications of using human tissue for scientific research and raises questions about informed consent and ownership of biological

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

But, German organization, ZEBET, specifically dedicates themselves to replacing, refining, and reducing animal testing. ZEBET has discovered safer alternative solutions without the aid and suffering of animals. One such technique discovered was, “in vitro models… three-dimensional tissue reconstruction models….” (Liebsch, et al. 844). This would provide full skin and other organ models to conduct testing techniques.

Read More
1321 Words | 6 Pages

With technology improving, the death rate will drop significantly for those who are not able to acquire an organ from a human donor. Surgeries using body parts from animals can be risky to those who will be willing to be a test subject, patients in the past who received organs from animals were known to only live a couple of days after the transplant. Luckily scientists are able to see what went wrong by using past failures to help them with future organ transplants using

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

-Scientists have a specific responsibility to evade unnecessarily and minimize the pain in the treatments (replacement reduction refinement 3Rs). (Gannon,2007,p.519,para.4). Source 3 The ethics of animal research (Simon festing and Robin Wilkinson) -Implementation of laws that enables people to know more about the researches -The conducted regulated and controlled animal researches in addition to the implementation of the 3Rs and the use of compute models, human cell lines helped to lower our reliance on animals ” Approximately 2.7 million regulated animal procedures were conducted in 2003 in the UK—half the number performed 30 years ago”(Festing &Wilkinson,2007,p.528,para.3). -There exist solution to reduce animal testing like the use of cell culture based tests and Microdosing techniques , the inherent limitation of some non animal tests, and good experimental design and many others techniques like cooling and magnetic resonance thathelps to reduce the use of animals.

Read More
3318 Words | 14 Pages

For many years artificial limbs have been used in a variety of cases, but more recent is the application of life sustaining organs such as the bladder and heart. For instance, artificial hearts are considered a relatively successful application as a means of life support, used until the patient is able to receive a donor organ; moreover they are able to sustain life for up to 18 months. It is the hope of many researches, that it will soon be possible that artificial organs to be used as a permanent replacement for organ donors. From a moral standpoint this method of transplantation is relatively conflict free, as humans are not used as an organ source, however the fact that animal testing is used extensively in research does still raise ethical issues. It is important to note that there are still some groups that may question the current effectiveness, cost and possibility of malfunctioning of artificial organs.

Read More
1726 Words | 7 Pages

A scientist could produce several embryo clones and experiment on them. For example, scientists could inject the viruses of currently incurable diseases into the clone so that they can more closely observe the stages of the disease. Or, in other cases, scientists could figure out the causes to idiopathic diseases and disorders through these experiments. However, experimenting on a body without the purpose of fixing it decreases the reliability of the scientists involved (Beates 76). This should not be allowed as through these actions one can see that man is now viewed as merely mechanisms and tools that can be changed or controlled for one’s desires (Kimbrell 72).

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

Scientists are able to test on cells in a petri dish, instead of using something that is living. This is a good idea because you can use any type of cell that you want. If you use human cells, you can get a much more accurate result, and find out if the product is really safe. Some people will volunteer to donate blood in order to test on. Scientists have also created artificial skin called Thincert.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

("Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Progress Report,")("Greiner Bio-One Launches Artificial Skin to Replace Animal Testing,") There are computer models, such as virtual reconstructions of human molecular structures, can predict the toxicity of substances without invasive experiments on animals. ("Greiner Bio-One Launches Artificial Skin to Replace

Read More
353 Words | 2 Pages

Animal research, a debate for animal rights. Several experts believe the idea valid to debate, while numerous deem the idea absurd. Richard L. Cupp Jr., professor of law at Pepperdine University School of Law, states in his article,¨Animal Cruelty Laws Don't Depend on Animal Rights,¨ that,¨ Rather than focusing on rights for cats and dogs, we should focus on human moral responsibility.¨ People are arguing that we should give animals personhood. ¨Biomedical researchers must study laboratory animals to discover new medicines and therapies, and deem them safe and effective,¨ says Frankie Trull, president of the National Association for Biomedical Research (NABR). She says this, stating that without animal research, there would be no cure for

Read More
138 Words | 1 Pages

Few can argue against animal research when it comes to assistance for medical advancement. However, with advancement of medicine, the ethical treatment of animals may be sacrificed. In the city of Detroit, Wayne State University is under investigation for cruel and unusual methods to their animal testing. Wayne State University has been using dogs for cardiovascular research. Therefore, they are mainly on a treadmill for most of the day and “sometimes they’re so tired they can’t even eat — they’re listless, then the dogs are all eventually euthanized if they don’t die on the treadmill or in their cage later.”

Read More
1260 Words | 6 Pages

Chromosomal concerns, birth defects, and other errors in development could be corrected before birth, giving more newborns a real chance to experience the gift of life (11 Stem Cell Research Pros and Cons).” This knowledge could be revolutionary. Using stem cells to grow artificial kidneys and other organs could offer a cruelty-free method of medical research testing. As of today, in order for a medical researcher to get their treatment or drug approved, it must undergo lengthy animal and human trials that could potentially take years only to be proven unsuccessful. However, if researchers could use stem cells to conduct these

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

Imagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout moral, humanistic, and social perspectives animal testing is beneficial for medical evolution. Animals ' rights are of less moral worth than human rights. Humans are complex beings with large well developed brains, which form sizeable social groups, have significant ability to communicate with one another, and possess desires, preferences and interests about the world. Humans have an awareness of their own existence and mortality, and as such are beings worthy of moral consideration. According to Pycroft (2011), “Without access to live organisms we would know far less bout the function of the cardiovascular, how digestion works…

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

There are other scientific methods that can replace animal usage. Recently, scientists have found techniques to test out medical cures. One possible use is to take human tissue

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Animal Research

Related Topics

Open Document