ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Being A Juror

698 Words3 Pages

A jury is a body of typically twelve people, who give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence presented to them in court. The jurors independently review the evidence that is presented by either prosecuting or defending barristers, or solicitor advocates and they are required to come to a decision whether the accused is guilty or not guilty.
To become a juror you must be between the ages of 18-70, be registered as someone who can vote in either the parliamentary or local authority elections, a resident in the UK, the channel islands or the Isle of Man for at least 5 years since their 13th birthday and not subject to any of the disqualifications. Jurors also have to undergo background checks. This was brought about by the ABC trial in 1978 where two journalists and a soldier were charged with collecting secret information. The jury had been vetted so it was thought that more checks should be made in the future, due to this.
You can be disqualified from jury service if you are sentenced to life imprisonment, if you have been imprisoned for public protection, serving an extended sentence or serving a prison term of five years or more. This is because these people have been convicted and lost their right to …show more content…

Defined by the criminal justice act of 2003 you can’t sit as a juror if you have previously or are currently suffering from a mental illness, a psychopathic disorder or suffer mental handicap or severe mental handicap. You also can’t sit as a juror If you are resident in a hospital or similar institution or regularly attend treatment by a medical practitioner. But due to the criminal justice act of 2003 this isn’t always black and white as some judges accept some people with mental disorders to sit as a juror, for example, if a person is stable and takes regular medication. Also if a person’s condition doesn’t affect their ability to make a fair

Show More
Related
515 Words | 3 Pages

Jurors should not know anything about a specific case and not follow public affairs and read the news (Doc F). When a person is selected to be part of a jury, they have to say an oath stating that they will not use their emotions to determine the verdict of a trial. If a juror is caught using their emotions, they will be fined for a crime called perjury. Since there are twelve people in a jury, there is a variation of opinions when the jury decides a verdict. But, a judge is more professional and knows how to only use the evidence provided and be less biased.

Read More
1285 Words | 6 Pages

A majority of citizens see jury duty as some sort of punishment, which is made clear by popular television shows and other forms of media, which greatly diminishes the value of the jury system. In cases where the media plays a major role, such as the Casey Anthony case, jurors can be endangered after a verdict is made (Document D, 295). A woman was told that Anthony was found not guilty, and she said that Anthony would not be accepted back into the community and would have to move away. Jurors of the case who came to the verdict would also be in danger of being ostracized by the community for their unfavorable decision; if these citizens had known about the outcry that would follow the verdict, they most likely wouldn’t have served on the jury at all. A total of 5,082 trials were jury trials in one year, which was a small fraction of all cases tried in the same year (Document A, 289).

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

In the cartoon “Jury” by Keith Robinson, many of the jurors aren’t paying attention, which is human nature. “I wonder if the defense attorney is single” (Doc E). In this example, the juror was more focused on getting a date then the actual case. Many people drift off, even the best, most educated people in the world, drift off at times. Although people are saying that a judge would be better at reaching a decision on the case, a judge is also human.

Read More
1223 Words | 5 Pages

“When you go into court you are putting your fate into the hands of twelve people who weren’t smart enough to get out of jury duty” quoted by a man whose name is Norm Crosby. People who get called in for jury duty who are biased or unfair on the case have a valid reasoning to be dismissed from sitting in on a jury duty. Although some people don’t always take advantage of this opportunity, they are stuck in attending the jury duty and is unfair because they are biased to the situation. This ties into the short play called “Twelve Angry Men” written by Reginald Rose, because there were jurors who sat in on the case who were biased to the setting and continued to make an appearance at the jury duty. “Twelve Angry Men”, Rose demonstrates the danger

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

In Twelve Angry Men, Juror 1(Foreman) says, “Anyway this friend of my uncle’s was on a jury once, about ten years ago- a case just like this one..... They let him off. Reasonable doubt. And do y’know, about eight years later they found out that he’d actually done it, anyway.” By allowing different people onto the jury, they have the ability to give assumptions and information about other cases which can sway and harm the verdict.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

"Jury System; a system in which the verdict in a legal case is decided by a jury on the basis of evidence submitted to it in court. " Starting at eighteen, you become eligible for jury duty – something many have to do as one of our civic duties, however, it wasn 't always this way. As far as historians know, the jury was established by William the Conqueror who brought it to England from Normandy. However, this system that he brought was nothing more than a system that had witnesses who knew of the matter in question to tell the court what they knew. It 's a known fact that our courts and laws have changed and evolved since when we first created them, otherwise lynching and stoning would still be acceptable punishments for varying crimes.

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

Citizen Required To Serve? Jury a group of citizens sworn to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them in court. Being able to serve on a jury is an absolute privilege to do for some and one thing that makes this country very different and unique from others. Serving on a jury should not be required for citizens. Some people believe serving on a jury should be a requirement for every citizen.

Read More
188 Words | 1 Pages

While there are many advantages of juries in criminal trials in NSW, there are also many disadvantages. As people in juries are normal, everyday people, they may not be able to fully comprehend legal documents or any sort of forensic evidence. The fact that they are normal people can also effect what information is disclosed by the jury, as they may not know what information to disclose or keep to themselves. The Jury Act 1977 (62) states that is prohibited to supply false or misleading information to the sheriff in a case. Each person in the jury may have their own personal biases, specifically racial, which effects the overall outcome of a trial.

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

The last danger to the justice system is jurors on the jury duty have no common sense to figure out the truth behind cases. One example is in the play “Twelve Angry Men” juror 10 says about juror 8 “ He’s a common ignorant slob. He don’t even speak good English” (Rose 326)! Then juror 11 corrects juror 10 saying “He doesn’t even speak good English” (Rose 326). Also anyone that is a United States citizen and of the age of 18 is allowed to be called to be on jury duty.

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

The American Government is made up of three branches: judicial, legislative, and executive. Americans are very fortunate to have a judicial system in the United States, which is based on the idea that everyone is innocent until proven guilty. The same problems still happen today in 2018 that happened in 1957 when the movie Twelve Angry Men by MGM was made. Common reasons jury duty is not popular include taking time off work, not getting the same amount of pay as if one is at work, and simply just not wanting to be there. People will always be biased from their own experiences.

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

They should likewise serve on jury obligation. Such ailments can here and there be sufficiently irritating to keep individuals from concentrating on basic, regular errands. They're going to sit on a jury and pay consideration on what's going on? Gimme a break!

Read More
296 Words | 2 Pages

Hello, I am your newly appointed juror well not yet, but if this essay is great I would love to be one of your 12 jury members. In my opinion to be a jury member you have to be fair and just which are two qualities I have been given by God. One main reason that I want to be a juror is you get to decide the fair fate of the defendant and plaintiff. Another reason is I have always loved to hear about my parents jury duty and LOVE crime T.V. shows.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

I think that I would like to be on a jury and experience what is required of a juror, I think everyone should be a member of the jury at least once in their lifetime. Having to experience the juries’ duties on a civil or criminal case, in some instance would be hard. Especially in a murder case involving children or battered women. When the judge gives you direction to please disregard that statement. How can you disregard information that you have heard?

Read More
1576 Words | 7 Pages

Besides, ‘lawyers, psychologists and others who are potentially able to utilise their professional experience in deciding cases are also not obligated to serve as jury’. Additionally, the parties with the consent of the court may preclude jury. The jury members can also preclude themselves if either they have been on the jury for the past year; or they have to fulfil work, changing of which will cause significant damage; or because of their state of health; or have been abroad for a long time or is leaving Georgia; or is older than 70 years of

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will briefly discuss the role of the jury and how it works, from the principle behind it, to the method with which members are selected, and to the powers available to jurors. Moreover, it will outline advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, and it will point out a couple of ways which could ameliorate this type of trial. Trial by jury has been a part of the criminal justice system since the 12th century (Davies, 2015), it is considered an ancient right and a symbol of liberty (Hostettler, 2004). It creates no precedent and it can decide challenging cases equitably without making bad law, it also brings members of the public into the administration of justice and into an understanding of legal and human rights (Hostettler,

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Being A Juror

Related Topics

Open Document