ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Breaking The Sedition Act

791 Words4 Pages

I am disagreeing with the majority of the supreme court as curbing speech during wartime is unconstitutional. This law can be found in the First Amendment which calls for free speech to always be upheld. This Amendment does not make exceptions for wartime. The First Amendment is the most crucial part of this case. Both Debs and Schenck are being tried as they have broke the Sedition Act. This law should never have been established as it curbs free speech that offers an opinion that is against the war. There justification for this law is that not having this puts America in a bad position. In reality this law does the opposite as more people may become against the war if they know that they are being suppressed because of the war. If we prove these men to be guilty does this lead to even further suppression? Even with these laws they should still not be found guilty as these laws should only be used if what they are saying is actively causing violent mobs or calling for people to assassinate American leaders which these two men did not. The Sedition Act may have been established with good intentions but its loose idea of what should be …show more content…

His Pamphlet does not call for violence or any kind of drastic measures. He just wants the United States to take a step back on their current ideas. He is just trying to show people his viewpoint this pamphlet does not hurt the war effort. Some things he says like “Upholders of military ideas are unfit teachers” could be a little inaccurate, but things like this are not taking it too far. This is a problem with the Sedition Acts as they do not specify how far is too far. Maybe with more clarification these laws would deserve to be taken more seriously. The law relies too much on circumstances as in normal times what he is saying would be perfectly acceptable and having acceptability be determined by if there is a war is morally

Show More
Related
156 Words | 1 Pages

During World War I, Charles Schenck sent a copious amount of circulars over to the draftees. The circulars consisted of anti-draft sentiments and claimed that the draft was despicably supported by the capitalist system. Schenk basically told the readers to join him in protest. Schenk was unsurprisingly charged with conspiracy for his action due to violating the Espionage Act of 1917 by causing disruption in the military and attempting to prevent military recruitment. The main issue emerging from this case was whether or not Schenck’s circulars were protected by the First Amendment’s via freedom of speech.

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

However, according to Document 1, “Any statement might interfere with the armed forces, incite disloyalty, or obstruct recruiting to the Army became a punishable offense.” So the Espionage Act was passed to punish anyone who conveyed information intended to interfere with the armed forces. The next year, the Sedition Act was passed to make harsh punishments against anyone who spoke false information that interfered with war. When the Espionage Act was made a law, according to Document 2, “Charles T. Schenck was convicted of violating the act by printing and distributing to draftees leaflets that urged them to resist the draft.” One argument used by the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold Charles T. Schenck was, “When a nation is at war many things which might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its efforts that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight...

Read More
219 Words | 1 Pages

It is a very beneficial law that wouldn’t let anyone take advantage of the military. A really big scenario would be when the president sent the troops without the permission from the congress. The whole debate was about the president getting punished for what he did and didn't follow the law. I think that the

Read More
410 Words | 2 Pages

With the audience targeted at the supreme court and the general good of everyone, Timothy’s strategies were far more effective than James Madison. In Timothy Pickering Upholds the Repressive Laws, Pickering uses strong vocab and tone words to describe his disgust towards the foreigners and his passion for the Alien and Sedition Act. He describes foreigners as “pest of society” and “disturbers of order and tranquility.” He uses words like “malicious falsehoods” and “defamation” to describe their actions towards the government. He also compares the people who believe the people who believe the act goes against the Bill of Rights with “knocking down the first person we meet” , then excusing ourselves from punishment because we are “free agents.”

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

Today we see a lot of protesting and opinions being stated all over social media. In the late 1960s the United States started to get involved in the Vietnam War, which started a lot of protests because people did not want to fight in a war that mainly did not concern them. In 1968, David O’Brien wanted to express his disapproval of the war (United States v. O’Brien). So, while standing outside the Boston Courthouse, he decided to burn his drafting card in front of quite a few people (United States v. O’Brien). He did this so he could exercise his first amendment right, which is the freedom of speech and/or press (United States v. O’Brien).

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

This event aligns with the creation of The Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act made in 1918. The purpose of these laws was to forbid "spying and interfering with the draft but also "false statements" that might impede military success", as well as any ' 'statements intended to cast "contempt, scorn or disrepute" on the "form of government" or that advocated interference with the war effort" (Voices of Freedom 119). As a result, American citizens expressing their disapproval in any form regarding the war would be arrested and punished by these

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

It also made it illegal to try to “[obstruct the] production in support of war efforts.” In addition to avoid internal conflicts during war time, the bill was passed as a response of fear to the rise of communism overseas. A U.S. Supreme Court case, Schenck v. United States, which concluded with the Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. stating that the actions of Schenck, who was passing anti-draft pamphlets to young men, that his actions would intend the crime of sedition and created a “clear and present danger.” This also led to the standard of the bad tendency test in which the inclination of the speech was to promote an illegal action. In 1951 shortly after the World War II, several Communists were tried by the United State Supreme Court.

Read More
1536 Words | 7 Pages

Prompt #2- Legal Controversies during the Trump Administration and Marshall Era Episodes from the 1780s through the Marshall era were crucial to the evolution of American legal history, as they shaped policies and laws regarding many present-day issues that are prevalent to the Trump Administration. Current legal controversies are quite extensive and illuminate issues regarding federal immigration enforcement, national security, conflicts with the press, Supreme Court nomination fights, financial policy, and land disputes. One of the most critical issues, that is constantly in the spotlight, is the matter of free speech and conflicts with the press. During the period of the Sedition Acts, there were three key Supreme Court cases that tried the defendants, critics of the Adams Administration, for making critical statements about President Adams. The government deemed these statements as untruthful

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

In the book, Give Me Liberty, it indicated that the “Sedition Act of 1918, it was made a crime to make spoken

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

The first amendment states that “Congress cannot enact laws limiting ”the freedom of speech or press.”’ (Kentucky Resolutions) Again, in short, this amendment is saying that the federal government is not able to pass a law that takes away someone’s right to speak their opinion. Contrary to this amendment, the Federal government did exactly the opposite of what the amendment said was allowed. The acts, passed by John Adams, take away the human right of speaking what is on the mind and using what they say to show them off as a threat.

Read More
1407 Words | 6 Pages

The statement was false and the supreme court ruled that it was unconstitutional to cause false danger. The supreme court said “ the convictions of the defendant for conspiring to violate certain federal statutes by attempting to incite subordination in the armed forces.” People now can 't make false accusations that will cause danger, it 's illegal. This man uses the first amendment in a harmful way causing attention to the case. Another case that the supreme court reviewed was “West Virginia State Board of Education V. Barnette” (1943 where in West Virginia the school board requires the students at school to salute the flag.

Read More
418 Words | 2 Pages

He also addresses the issue using another if-then statement in paragraph 9, he states "the expense of violence, victory would come at the expense of injury and perhaps death," Many civil rights movements such as the US civil war took the lives of many citizens many that were innocent. The more violence is used the more innocent people will lose their lives.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

Several people had the impression that the acts violated their civil liberties somehow. In particular, some felt that the Sedition Act was a direct assault on their right to freedom of the press. Because the Constitution does not provide the federal government the authority to control immigration, the restrictions on immigration included in the Naturalization Act were also considered unlawful by many people. In addition, many believed that the Alien and Sedition Acts were used as a method of discrimination because they were directed at immigrants and political

Read More
1204 Words | 5 Pages

The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.

Read More
306 Words | 2 Pages

The first years of school are very formative for students and learning shouldn't be a boring or tiring activity. Handwriting is becoming less and less important, with all the technology available and is taught as though it is being replaced. However, children still need the fundamentals -- the alphabet -- to write. Preschoolers Startwrite has a number of worksheets to help your little learner practice letters and shapes they are introduced to in class.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Breaking The Sedition Act

Related Topics

Open Document