Pros And Cons Of Crisis Interviewing

There are two methods for which clients are evaluated during an apparent crisis. The first approach requires that the clinician or counselor conduct a crisis interview with the client in hopes of identifying the major contributing factors or triggers of the emergency so that the practitioner can then provide the patient with an immediate resource or aid to help eliminate the threat and stabilize the patient (Trull & Prinstein, 2013). For instance, upon arrival at an AspenPointe crisis care facility, each patient is immediately evaluated by either a peer counselor, therapist, social worker, or another mental health professional. The purpose of this evaluation is not only to address the immediate problem at hand, but also review the risks for

178). In most cases, it can beneficial to conduct the crisis interview using either informal or semi-formal interviewing techniques just as long as the clinician remembers to ask the client open-ended questions as a method of obtaining as much information from the client as reasonable. A major consideration for clinicians employed at crisis walk-in centers, call-in services, or web-based counseling programs, such as those offered at AspenPointe, concerns the fact that the working environment within these facilities are more likely informal enough already (Trull & Prinstein, 2013), so it’s crucial that crisis therapists and counselors remain cognizant of their ethical and legal responsibilities as a licensed professional in charge of the care and well-being of patients in