Integrated Health Care Model

A rising number of hospitals throughout the U.S. are applying a service model known as integrated health care (Kathol, Perez, Cohen 2010). The need for this is center around this area:

Integration has made its approach into the health care settings gradually. This can assist in treating one’s medical and behavioral health needs within patient’s primary care provider’s office, recommending a proper evaluation as a whole person (Blout, 2003). Medical clinics have been used for a many years but its recognition is growing nationwide because of its effectiveness. Impact all parties involved, including but not limited to, patients, providers and insurance companies can be very effective. This can be tailored in different ways for each patient to

Such as, several hospitalization for mental health concerns, lack of training and education in medical staff that lead to improper referrals and occasionally chart reviews by a provider after a massive emergency. This has provoked patient leaving with out referrals and not being linked to care or being managed poorly. Many patients have stigma even being associated with the term ‘mental health’, which can then lead to no treatment at all (CORRIGAN & WATSON (2002). Another main focus is to provide the necessary information/resources to prepare practitioners for the arrival of integrated health care. This includes the education being provided to staff members in hopes to engage patients in behavioral health services to improve their overall well-being, medical and behavioral health. Of the top five conditions driving overall health cost, depression is number one. There are financial benefits of integrated care. The ultimate challenges in an effort to have integration services are the funding’s and who is being billed for what services. This is a difficulty, it is not easy just to improve and create a economically sustainable integrated services delivery system. Many cities moving onward with Medicaid Health Homes are in the route of making modifications to guidelines, billing, and service delivery to support service providers to integrate behavioral health and

Of the top five conditions driving overall health cost, depression is number one. There are financial benefits of integrated care (Korff , Katon, Unützer, Wells , Wagner (2001). The platform for this model is important to be in clinics where patients visit the most and supervised with a collaborative team of patient educators, social workers, nurses, physicians, and consultant psychiatrist (Hunter, Goodie, Oordit, & Dobmeye, (2009). The team should be available to the patient for a first encounter the same day to identify the patient’s needs. Each appointment is concise except the evaluation by the Social Worker. The purpose of the first meet and greet is to give an evaluation of the condition. Based on this a plan is formulated with the focus of improving there coping skills during treatment. Can this treatment model be effective in outpatient settings with evidence-based anxiety and depression? Based on several articles the team will be the effective system who are liable for outcomes and who direct he connections between different professions. Each member plays a specific role in the process of a patient’s intervention. Works together to approach a better treatment and better outcome (Seaburn, Lorenz, Gunn, Gawinski, & Mauksch,