First, Driverless cars should be possible because If drunk people are behind the wheel they and/or some else could be hurt In addition, It would save us air by using energy instead of gas. Above all, They have less parts to replace or own witch saves us metal.
Many people including the NYPD chief of police, say. First, “Have you ever been riding in a car that was pulled over for speeding or a broken taillight? If so, you might have seen the driver get a ticket, which can mean having to pay a big fine. Future drivers will be happy to hear that this may never happen to them. That's not because police are going soft but because soon humans won’t be doing the driving.” Next, I would like to say that some people are to tempted to steal cars, but if there is driverless cars they would have to be smart, because they will have something to allow only the owner to drive it.
…show more content…
It’s already here. Bits and pieces of it, anyhow. Many new cars use cameras and sensors to park themselves, for instance. Others have accident avoidance systems that can completely stop the car without the driver even touching the brakes.” Next Don’t forget about people running over people and who makes the computers, people basted of what they think so if a killer made a robot the robot would be just like the man or the killer. Don’t forget, “The system makes it possible for cars with V2V technology to have electronic conversations among themselves. They will be aware of one another’s position and speed in order to predict and avoid accidents. This could prevent situations where, for instance, car A runs a red light because it's driver wasn’t paying attention and strikes car B.” last, If there is a cop who makes it it will want to fight crime. In conclusion, people can sneak drugs in and out so police don’t want