ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Fracking

1387 Words6 Pages

Hydraulic Fracturing Hydraulic fracturing is a process to extract oil or gas from a well. This drilling process has been used for approximately sixty-five years. It first began in the 1940’s. Hydraulic fracturing is also known as Fracking, where millions of water, sand and chemicals are pumped underground to break apart the rock, which releases natural gas (Schmidt). The development of this process requires a significant amount of water and due to this process there are some pros and cons. As America has witnessed, we are in the era of the natural gas boom. The economic benefits of drilling has impacted our access to gas and oil. This technical revolution has increased our domestic supply by fifty percent, due to the result of Fracking. …show more content…

There are those who support fracking and those who don’t. From an ethical perspective we might look at benefits and harms of fracking. Do the potential dangers of fracking, including contaminating water supplies, outweigh the potential benefits of producing oil and gas resources at a time when our national security may be in jeopardy because of our continued reliance on unreliable sources of energy? Is the United States energy independence more important than the potential for harm to those affected by fracking procedures (Ethics Sage)? The issue on having an ethical right, why not release all available information to the public about the safety risks to let the public decide. Those being affected by fracking have an ethical right to know the potential harm to their drinking water and other environment effects. This will lead to a trade-off decision between sacrificing some health and safety concerns in the name of providing economic benefits, including jobs and increasing exports to countries that crave safer natural gas energy supplies for their growing economy. These are tough decisions that one must …show more content…

I am on the opposing side of fracking. The process of fracking requires eight million gallons of water per fracking. Seventy-two trillion gallons of water is needed to run current gas wells in the United States. There are 40,000 gallons of chemicals used for each fracturing site and 360 billion gallons of chemicals needed to run the current gas wells. Ninety percent of the water used for fracking never returns to the surface. Since the water is permanently removed from the natural water cycle this is bad news for the drought we are experiencing. Fracking also increases water pollution. Water supplies in areas where fracking takes place tended to show an increase in the amount of dangerous chemicals. The water seeps through the earth and end up in reservoirs, the seas, and other bodies of water, which can harm the

Show More
Related
856 Words | 4 Pages

Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, for natural gas can be detrimental to the water sources the public and wildlife need so much. First of all, the way the water that was used for fracturing the shale stone is stored, can render public water sources useless for consumption or residential use. The recovered

Read More
1353 Words | 6 Pages

Fracking allows the United States to be less dependent on foreign oils and finding other local sources of energy. Now there are roughly 35,000 natural gas wells in the United States. A local community

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

"Flow-back water can be treated, but there are large volumes of it" (Marc 2). This water is, on occasion, dumped into local water supply, whether that be groundwater, rivers or lakes, other times this radon-heavy water is treated, or stored, both of which require lots of money wand time (Marc 2). This affects local wildlife, and people living in the area. Another problem, water companies won't be able to pin this pollution to fracking, as the slew of chemicals is hidden to only the people who produce this unnatural concoction (Marc 2).This method of natural gas extraction also spews out high levels of methane toxins, "The researchers found that drinking water near fracking wells had levels of methane that "fell squarely within a range that the U.S. Department of Interior says is dangerous and requires urgent 'hazard mitigation' action," " (Marc 3). So we gat greenhouse gasses, so we get radioactive water, but what is actually going to cause physical damage?

Read More
1275 Words | 6 Pages

One reason is that it is allowing the natural gas industry to boom, and natural gas is much cleaner than other fossil fuels. Natural gas produces only two thirds the amount of emissions of crude oil and only half as many emissions as coal. This has given natural gas the label of a transition fuel, which could be used by countries to transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy. Transitioning more to natural gas can help lessen the effects of climate change, due to the fact that it is cleaner than other fossil fuels. Another benefit of fracking is that it allows stores of oil and natural gas to be harvested that previously seemed out of reach.

Read More
1387 Words | 6 Pages

Two parties make up the fracking debate: the proponents and the critics. Very little of a middle ground is present in this conversation; the opinions appear to be very polarized with strong convictions. The advocates of fracking believe the procedure can relieve dependence on foreign oil, vitalize local economies, is safer than other methods of oil and gas extraction, and that it occurs so deep underground it is nearly impossible for it to affect groundwater or drinking water. In contrast, opponents argue that fracking can pollute their water, its runoff emissions are hazardous, the trucks needed to operate this procedure disturb the local ecosystem’s carbon levels, and that people have little say in these operations. Both sides provide legitimate arguments; however, the consequences of fracking are far more significant than the so-called benefits.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Each fracking site needs more than 400 trucks to carry water, chemicals, and sand. This is damaging our roads and the noise on the roads. As fracking keeps on, the fresh water will decrease ounce by ounce, the air will keep contaminating with every leakage, the risks will become more hazardous, and the noise will only

Read More
1147 Words | 5 Pages

Economic gains associated with fracking are outweighed by the human and environmental damages caused. The extraction and utilization of fossil fuels comes with environmental concerns, and fracking is no exception. The fracking process involves drilling deep wells and injecting a mix of water, chemicals, and sand at a high pressure to release natural gas. Fracking can pollute freshwater and is linked to earthquakes in surrounding areas.

Read More
1618 Words | 7 Pages

What the Frack? Cancer, earthquakes, infertility, pollution, and droughts. These are all products of a sad reality for those living near hydraulic fracturing cites. Hydraulic fracturing, or more commonly referred to as fracking, is the process of injecting waste-water, or water filled with hazardous chemicals and sand, down into oil rigs to obtain oil and natural gas.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Furthermore, the lack of oversight of the chemicals used during the fracking operations at the federal and state level has enhanced the problem by allowing these companies to utilized a vast amount of chemicals that are regulated under the Safe Water Drinking Act, the Clean Air Act and others acts, to be used in complete disregard for the safety and welfare of the citizens and the environment under the assumption that oil dependency is a treat to national security. While placing emphasis in profits and not in the safety of the citizens. My hypothesis is that is the current trends continue, the fresh water resources of the United States will be polluted beyond repair within three

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

Pros of Fracking Hydraulic Fracking is a drilling technique that involves injecting a slurry of chemicals and water at high pressure into the ground to break rocks to release natural gas. Since the mid to late 1900's the rate of the oil and natural gas production through fracking has increased. Due to the high production of oil in the past years, U.S could improve, make its market better and it's economy better. .Based on my research on fracking, I have constructed that the method of fracking is more effective than other techniques.

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

Fracking is the process of injecting high pressure fluid deep into the earth to release fossil fuel trapped in shale rock formations. The United States is home to what some estimate to be the world’s largest shale gas reserves. Natural gas now fuels about 40% of the country’s electricity. (Grace Communications Foundation, 2017) While the use of fracking has allowed for lower gas prices, many are concerned with the possible negative environmental and social impacts of hydraulic fracking.

Read More
368 Words | 2 Pages

Fracking is a phenomenon that has taken the world by storm! Hydraulic Fracturing is the procedure of creating fractures in rocks and rock formations by injecting fluid into cracks to force them further open, releasing oil and natural gas. Even though fracking can be very beneficial it also comes with cons. Fracking is a innovative way to get to those fossil fuels from deep down inside the earth that we use on a day to day basis. In source C (Fracking Explained) it describes how energy consumption in the U.S. has risen with no signs of stopping every since the industrial revolution.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

The process of fracking allows humans to extract the colorless, shapeless and odorless gas and oil when it is in its original form, which is later on used for electric power, in industries, in vehicles and in other important worldwide makings. Finally, the significance of fracking in the United States has clearly become leading to macroeconomists to state that the country is changing from a “net importer” to a “net exporter” of oil and gas over the coming years. Table 1: " What Is Fracking and Why Is It Controversial? - BBC News.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Our natural resources are at risk every time fracking occurs. Fracking needs to be banned since it is hurting our health and that it drains our natural and limited resources required for us to sustain life.    Water is an essential to living and it is a need. Without it we would be dead from the dehydration. Fracking in this case can contaminate it to where we cannot drink it and if we do it can lead to death or a trip to the hospital:

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

Fracking is one of the best ways to get natural resources. “Fracking is a process of drilling down into the earth before a high-pressure water mixture is directed at the rock to release the gas inside” (Unknown). Adversaries of fracking will say that it is dangerous, use up our water supply, and poison our water supply, but that is not totally true, fracking will bring in more money, save money, and will make the air cleaner and safer. Fracking may seem unacceptable because of what people say about it, however, when they drill deep into the facts they will see that fracking is actually very beneficial. Fracking will bring in tons of money for all of the United States.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Fracking

Related Topics

Open Document