Pros And Cons Of Godwin
In “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin says “many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined.” By doing so, Rifkin tries to appeal to human emotions through the use of pathos, in order to reflect our current viewpoint to match his opinion. Although animals have cognitive abilities and emotions similar to humans, I have to disagree on the basis that we should not change the way that we normally treat animals because of survival of the fittest and that human lives should be put over animals’. Despite the fact that it seems inhumane to treat animals poorly, it is actually beneficial to the lives of people. Rifkin raises questions such as, “So what does all of this portend for the way we treat our fellow
To begin, when talking about animals it can be a very sensitive subject mainly because the way animals are treated on farms, and how no one feels the need to question these actions. This is because many people feel this issue doesn’t concern them. In this essay Matthew Scully discusses the issue on how animals are treated and how they should be given more respect, and attention. Matthew Scully argues that animals in these factory farms are wrongfully treated, he uses biblical references and addresses the morals of humans to get conservatives to act on this matter.
According to Jeremy Rifkin’s article, “A Change of Heart About Animals,” research has shown that animals are more similar to humans than originally believed. Through the many studies provided, Rifkin claims the need to provide better treatment towards animals. While animals deserve and could benefit from a more humane treatment than what is currently provided, they may not necessarily require a human-like lifestyle simply because of their similarities to humans.
A life is a life, i think that every living organisms on this planet that are breathing are important and we all should treat others with respect and with love. Animals are like us, not physically, but they can feel pain and lonely when we mistreated them in some ways. I believe humanity has the ethical obligation to change their behavior towards animals. In the article, “ A change of Hearts on Animals” written by Jeremy Rifkin stated some of his key points that humans should focuses more on animals’ feelings.
Animals are great and make our lives better but when they are suffering and all we can do is extend their pain for a few months and pay thousands of dollars it just isn’t worth it. Americans nowadays spend money on tons of things that aren’t worth it, but spending thousands of dollars on dying animals is ridiculous. Furthermore, people even treat their animals as family like for example “Eighty-Three Percent refer to themselves to as their parents pet’s mom or dad” (The Last Meow). As a former pet owner I can say that it is ridiculous how people consider animals as their family and use that to justify spending thousands of dollars to keep them for a few months longer.
In my opinion, you can judge someone’s character by their treatment of animals, because if someone is mean to animals, then they’re most likely a mean person. An example of
Humans give animals less moral consideration, than other humans because they believe that animals are lower on the totem pole. This is anthropocentrism because the human is ranking themselves as the most important living creature, and this unhealthy thought process leads to destruction and
In nature we see animals gang up and kill each other but we say “that 's just life” “that 's what happens in the wild,” but what is the wild. It is everywhere. We would not call these animals evil. When the runt of the litter is picked on we do not call the other pigs evil or cruel. We would not put them in jails.
However, ethics do play a role, in that morals is one of the elements that separates us from other animals. I believe that if you kill an animal or plant for food, you should put a majority of it to use in some way. I also believe animals and plants that are grown as a source of food should have as little interaction with humans as possible. We should not eat animals and plants if we are endangering their existence by eating them. As long as animal or plant does not fall into one of these exceptions, then I believe it is ethically permissible to eat
I will argue in favor of Regan’s principle that non-human animals should have moral rights. Tom Regan, a famous philosopher, proposed the idea “that animals have rights based on their inherent value as experiencing subjects of life” (Regan). For thousands of years, animals have been used for as pets, food, and labor. Throughout the past century, many philosophers, including Regan, have raised arguments on how we, as humans, are treating animals poorly.
Animal pain which is described by Lewis in two specific ways, one, that human and animal suffering cannot be compared and two, God isn’t actually not concerned for the animals sufferings they experience. Animal resurrection on the other hand is in simple terms that if human can experience this resurrection, then so to should animals. Next is human superiority, which is describing how many humans believe in this hierarchy between different parts of God’s creation, therefore, humans are superior to animals. Lewis however argues the reverse of most humans. The last component of Lewis’ animal theory is human cruelty.
I don’t think that the way in which humans use animals is ethical and we use them for selfish reasons because it's easy and there is money to be made. There are many alternatives instead of using animals in the year 2018. Our species no longer require them for servile and I believe it is time for things to change in regards to the ways in which animals are made to suffer through animal testing, slaughter, and meat production farms where they are packed into close quarters. If we do not require them for servile any longer but yet we constantly kill even when it is not necessary.
(ch.5 pg.47) It all clearly points to the fact that all animals (and humans) have different strengths and different jobs and that they are not equal. This is also the case because some of the animals capabilities elevated their status within their society. This inequality sometimes helped the farm by providing a firm government but often lead to harsh mistreatment of many of the animals. The only reason animals often listened to the leader was because he had ferocious dogs protected him and in certain cases he used that power to protect his own interests.
In the Bible, we see Justice as a relational on how a person relates to a standard of justice, in this case, God. We see justice as an act of fairness, equality,
Animals are being abused everyday and they are not taken into consideration when you see them being abused. They are suffering and they are being abused everyday and you all need to stop it. Animal cruelty is not something that just goes away the person doing it will keep doing it until someone stops them. Everyone needs to stop animal abuse and if everyone starts to make a difference others will to. Animals need help with this and everyone needs to help them.
More about Pros And Cons Of Godwin
Summary Of Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals
445 Words | 2 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Factory Farming By Matthew Scully
1104 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of A Change Of Heart About Animals By Jeremy Rifkin
864 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of A Change Of Hearts On Animals
270 Words | 2 PagesWhat Is The Last Meow Persuasive Essay
591 Words | 3 PagesThe Treatment Of Animals In The Call Of The Wild
701 Words | 3 PagesH. G. Moreau Analysis
1137 Words | 5 PagesLord Of The Flies By William Golding: A Literary Analysis
1489 Words | 6 PagesConsider The Lobster By David Foster Wallace Summary
1067 Words | 5 PagesTom Regan's Argument For Animal Rights
655 Words | 3 PagesCs Lewis Theory
1986 Words | 8 PagesSinger And The Capacity Argument Essay
1178 Words | 5 PagesSocial Roles In Animal Farm
899 Words | 4 PagesEssay On Justice In The New Testament
835 Words | 4 PagesPersuasive Speech About Animal Abuse
705 Words | 3 Pages