ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws On Felons

672 Words3 Pages

The issue of gun control has been a highly debated and controversial topic in many countries, including the United States. One particular aspect of this debate is whether gun control laws should be more strictly enforced towards felons, individuals who have been convicted of a serious crime. Proponents of stricter gun control laws for felons argue that it is necessary to prevent them from obtaining firearms and committing further crimes. In this essay, we will explore several reasons why gun control laws should be more enforced on felons.

First and foremost, felons have demonstrated a disregard for the law by committing a serious crimes. Felonies typically involve offenses such as murder, assault, robbery, and sexual assault, which pose significant risks to public safety. Individuals who have shown a willingness to engage in such illegal activities are considered to be a threat to society and should not be granted the privilege of owning firearms. Stricter enforcement of gun control laws towards felons would help to prevent them from acquiring firearms, which could be used to commit further crimes and endanger innocent lives. …show more content…

Studies have shown that individuals with a history of criminal behavior, including felonies, are more likely to engage in repeat offenses. According to a report by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, approximately 68% of released prisoners were arrested for a new crime within three years of their release, and 77% were arrested within five years. Allowing felons to possess firearms increases the likelihood of using these weapons to commit violent crimes, posing a serious threat to public safety. By enforcing gun control laws more strictly towards felons, we can reduce their ability to obtain firearms and lower the risk of them committing further

Show More
Related
805 Words | 4 Pages

Roger McGrath and Warren Burger provide different perspectives on the continuing debate over gun regulation in the United States. Although these authors establish opposing conclusions, both understand that gun related crimes are becoming increasingly common and therefore pose a threat to the domestic tranquility of the nation. Their controversy is centered around whether or not increased gun restrictions will lower criminal activity. McGrath, in his article “A God-Given Natural Right”, argues that increased gun control will only disarm law abiding citizens leaving them defenseless therefore providing incentives for criminals to break the law. However, Burger’s emphasis on the unrestricted distribution of firearms in his article “The Right to

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

Gun offenders get most of their guns from unlicensed sales. Contention 2: The times that the federal

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

Gary Kleck, Criminologist at Florida State University, in a sample size of 1,874 imprisoned felons across 10 states, 81% said a “smart criminal will try to determine if a potential victim is armed”, 74% agreed that burglars avoided occupied dwellings in “fear of being shot”, and 40% said they had been deterred from committing a crime because “they fear that the potential victim was armed” (LEG). In each of these situations, behaviors were altered because of the presence or potential presence of a firearm; the situation had changed due to the felon's knowledge of the intended design of a gun. Additionally, if a user's mindset or way of thinking is altered when holding a weapon, their mindset switches from that of one who is on equal grounds with their peers and the world around them, to one that holds a much higher degree of power over all non-gun-brandishing individuals. They go from the status of a person incapable of quickly firing bullets that can reliably pierce targets to the status of a potential shooter, both to themselves and all that perceives them. This power or status has impactful psychological effects.

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

For the past 232 years, Americans have had the right to defend themselves against crime, tyranny, and victimization through the rights given to us by our founding fathers. If these rights were restricted or even taken away from Americans, the crime rate would soar, and the safety of the people and families of America would be put in jeopardy. If these rights were restricted, the generations to come would be brought into an environment of violence and crime. (Purpose Statement) While many think that gun control can fix the rate of gun homicides and crimes and mass shootings, it will most likely have the opposite effect and will restrict our right to defend ourselves.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

Stricter Gun Control Laws: A Safer Society The debate over gun control has been a longstanding issue in the United States. With the rising number of mass shootings and gun violence, stricter gun control laws have become a topic of discussion. The question remains, would stricter gun control laws be better for society? This essay will argue that stricter gun control laws would indeed be better for society.

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

If you recollect about it, this really should be an anticipated effect of gun control, though most people don 't remember far enough past the words "gun" and "control" to see it. When you do give up and recollect about it though, the criminals who are committing crimes at present are the ones still making this a relevant issue of discussion in the foremost position. They are the aces who are either getting access to certain weapons that are already illegal and/or the ones who are using legal weapons illegally. If it weren 't for them disregarding laws and causing these crime rates to fail up, gun control would not still be in

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.

Read More
1179 Words | 5 Pages

Conservative gun-rights advocates should acknowledge that if more states had a stringent universal background check, or if a federal law put these in place, more guns would be kept out of the hands of criminals and the mentally unstable (Goldberg). Even though Americans who are qualified to possess firearms shouldn't be denied the right to participate in their own defense. Guns can be used to do evil, but guns can also be used to do good (Goldberg). It’s important that people know this concept and how guns should be

Read More
1906 Words | 8 Pages

When combining all of these factors of gun control laws, past and present, the result is not quite clear. While taking away all guns that contribute to violent crime would be brilliant on paper, it would limit the ability of citizens to protect themselves. Leaving many without proper means of home protection and subjected to violent crime. The absence of firearms in the hands of U.S. citizens could also cause an uproar across the country. The confusion, in regards to statistics and effectiveness of gun control laws, is due to the different interpretation of crime, which undoubtedly is due to prior bias by the interpreter.

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

I understand that if everybody had a firearm it would raise the murder rate tremendously, but one must admit  should be a little harder to get a gun, just cause you don’t have a criminal background does not mean you are not capable of doing the same actions a criminal. The gun control law should be made to where if you wanted  to purchase a firearm, that you

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

Gun control laws will not accomplish its intended goals of lowering the crime rate. Gun Control Overview says that “It will be difficult to keep weapons from being acquired by “high-risk” individuals, even under Federal laws and enforcement. Legal ramifications will not stop criminals from making crimes. Those who are determined, irrational, and insane will never respond to rational signals or the threat of legal ramifications. Indeed, such signals and ramifications will most likely encourage them further (3).”

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

The Dropping of the Atomic Bomb On the morning of Monday, August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan (“Harry S. Truman’s”). While it is presumably what caused the allies to defeat Japan, a lot of people are still torn, to this day, on whether or not the bombing was right politically, ethically, and militarily. A majority of the war was spent focused on the military; scientists attempted to make weapons as deadly as possible.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

In the wake of the recent string of mass shootings, the issues of gun control and gun rights have continued to be a national prominence. The frequencies of the occurrence of these mass shootings have desensitized many of the public. These mass shootings bring up an important issue and question at hand. Does limiting access to assault weapons reduce crime, more importantly mass shootings?

Read More
1169 Words | 5 Pages

Alexis Clarke Professor Frank English 110 29 October 2015 Gun Control Will Not Eliminate Crime The big issue of gun control in the United States, is that many people believe that it takes away the 2nd Amendment rights, which is the right to bear arms. Citizens of the United States are promised the the right to bear arms in the Constitution, and by applying gun control laws takes away that same right. Crime is high enough in cities with very few laws pertaining to gun control, but taking guns away from people who are registered with license will not solve the problem either. Placing more limitations on gun owners, particularly responsible gun owners, will not reduce gun violence.

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Everyday in the United States, ninety families are changed forever; guns claim an average of ninety lives every day in the United States, 33,000 lives in a single year. Gun control has been a debate in the United States for many years and is constantly thrusted back into the public’s attention by horrific shootings. These shootings constantly cause individuals to petition the government to place stricter and stricter regulations of guns. However, these policies cannot be the solution to this problem. To determine a solution that will be both effective and constitutional, we must look at statistics and research that has been conducted to determine the best course of action.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws On Felons

Related Topics

Open Document