ipl-logo

Insider Trading: Fair Dealing In The Capital Market

1684 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Insider trading unethical

Insider trading is a crime on the faith of fair dealing in the capital market. The stringency and scope of violation and penalty differs from country to country. Trading in shares of the company by an insider is violation of law. For example, an insider may come across a corporate fraud and disclose the fraud. An insider can also create information according to his future actions.
Trading by insiders, like directors, officers and employees of the company in the shares of their own company is actually a positive feature, and companies should encourage it as this aligns its interests with those of the insiders.
What actually is prohibited is the trading by an insider in breach of a duty of confidence in the stock of a company on the basis of …show more content…

Besides internet various sources like Companies Act 2013, SEBI guidelines, etc were used.
Organization of the …show more content…

Arthur Levitt, the then Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Chairman in 1998, “Insider trading has utterly no place in any fair-minded law-abiding economy”.
India’s encounter with insider trading was first seen in the 1940s. The Thomas Committee Report in 1948 cited instances of directors, agents, officers, auditors possessing strategic information regarding economic conditions of the company regarding the size of the dividends to be declared, or of the issue of bonus shares or the awaiting conclusion of a favorable contract prior to public disclosure.
Thus, Sections 307 and 308 were incorporated in the Companies Act of 1956. Section 307 provided for maintenance of a register by the companies to record the directors’ shareholdings in the company. Section 308 prescribed to the duty of the directors and persons deemed to be the directors to make disclosure of their shareholdings in the company. Thereafter, by the Companies Amendment Act, 1960 had extended this requirement to the shareholdings of a company’s managers as well. However, these provisions could not curb this practice of insider trading due to which the directors or managing agents making unfair use of inside information could go scot free.

Show More
Related

Foreclosure Issues In The CIBC Wood Gundy Case

824 Words | 4 Pages

Regardless, Saturley was well aware of the his positions code of ethics, as well as the seriousness of unauthorized discretionary trading. It turns out that this is not the first time he had been punished for such actions; he had also been reprimanded for discretionary trading in 2004, investigated again in 2007 and had received numerous CIBC bulletins warning against discretionary trading. He had several warnings, and yet continued to perform such

Read More

Andrew Carnegie's Laissez-Faire: Robber Barons

744 Words | 3 Pages

One example of this unethical way of business, was his way of acquiring “Allegheny Steel Company.” The company was beginning to become quite the competitor, using a new method that allowed the efficient, and effective production of steel. The company’s new method was so successful, they were able to undercut Carnegie’s own prices. However, Carnegie began spreading false rumors of the steel being manufactured by Allegheny Steel Company, implying it was ineffective, spreading alarm to their buyers. He was able to hurt their company and take the the reins.

Read More

Case Study: Cornerstone Therapeutics, Inc.

604 Words | 3 Pages

. . This Delaware Supreme Court decision is underscores the significant protections provided by exculpatory charter language to directors and special committees of public companies who are involved in negotiating and approving merger and acquisition transactions. Subject to certain limitations, Delaware General Corporation Law §102(b)(7) permits corporate charter language limiting a director’s personal liability to shareholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty. Section 102(b)(7) reads in relevant

Read More

How Did Bud Fox Invest In The Stock Market

1240 Words | 5 Pages

Question 1: Wall Street 1a) Bull Market: this is when share prices are increasing and influences investors to buy. They usually have green indicators or it’s a green arrow pointing up. b) Bear Market: This is when the share prices are decreasing.

Read More

Why Is Martha Stewart Illegal

688 Words | 3 Pages

Insider trading can be legal or illegal. In Martha Stewart’s case it was illegal. When many people hear the term “insider trading” it would be look at as a crime. Insider training is the trading of a public company stock or other securities by individuals with access to nonpublic, or insider information about the company. On December 27, 2001 highly publicized Martha Stewart sold all of her shares in the biotech company ImClone.

Read More

First Amended Complaint Case Study

917 Words | 4 Pages

I. INTRODUCTION 1. This First Amended Complaint contains causes of action for Federal violations of Sections 20 (b) 20 (d) (1) and 22(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 77t(b), 77t(d)(1), and 77v(a), and Sections 21(d)(1) 21(d)(3)(A), 21)e), and 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(1), 78u(d)(3)(A), and 78u(e), and 78aa. The first cause of action pertains to Defendant, Gerard Warrens, individually. 2. The First Amended Complaint also contains a cause of action for violations of A.R.S. § 44-1801(26) which defines "offers to sell" or "offers for sale" pursuant to A.R.S. § 44-1801(15) and sales as defined pursuant to A.R.S. § 44-1801(21) and A.R.S. § 44-1841 requiring registration of any dealer or salesperson from

Read More

Interstate Commerce Commission Vs Railroads

430 Words | 2 Pages

The commission also examined railroad companies and required annual reports. With scandalous histories ranging from persuading congressmen with railroad shares to favor funding them in

Read More

The Insider Trading: The Case Of Martha Stewart

813 Words | 4 Pages

From baking cookies to behind bars, Martha Stewart, the world’s most famous home decorator added her name to the long list of celebrity jailbirds in 2004. Stewart was investigated and tried for insider trading along with other charges such as, obstruction and conspiracy. The TV personality’s case was followed religiously by the press and is easily one of the most famed insider trading scandals. Stewart was convicted on obstruction and conspiracy in 2004 and sentenced to a five-month stay in a federal prison. Celebrities going to jail are not a new thing in today’s media and world; however, it was a shock that Martha Stewart, who is America’s ideal housewife, was tried for something as unethical as insider trading.

Read More

Senate Banking Committee Summary

115 Words | 1 Pages

In a 2004 interview, Senator Paul Sarbanes stated: “The Senate Banking Committee undertook a series of hearings on the problems in the markets that had led to a loss of hundreds and hundreds of billions, indeed trillions of dollars in market value. The hearings set out to lay the foundation for legislation. We scheduled 10 hearings over a six-week period, during which we brought in some of the best people in the country to testify... The hearings produced remarkable consensus on the nature of the problems: inadequate oversight of accountants, lack of auditor independence, weak corporate governance procedures, stock analysts ' conflict of interests, inadequate disclosure provisions, and grossly inadequate funding of the Securities and Exchange

Read More

Disclosure Scenario Analysis

1386 Words | 6 Pages

Just Consequentialism According to Moor, (2001) the theory of just consequentialism imply that the ends, however good, “do not justify using unjust means”. Regardless the action, there is need to ascertain if unjust means will enhance the action of the user, the mobile agent and the host. Therefore, if it is not possible to achieve the envisaged end (the given task) without using unjust means, the requirement of just consequentialism is not satisfied. Disclosure Module

Read More

Gilded Age Industrialization And The Panic Of 1873

671 Words | 3 Pages

One example was the Credit Mobilier scandal where major stockholders of the Union Pacific Railroad formed the Credit Mobilier company and sold their shares to influential congressmen. These executives essentially hired themselves and stole taxpayer money, a very lucrative scandal. Scandals like the Credit Mobilier were widespread and executives from many other railroad companies often stole from their own companies. Many executives would manipulate the rail companies' stocks to profit greatly. Executives would often bribe influential politicians, and work together to profit themselves.

Read More

Court Case Brief-US V. Martha Stewart And Peter Bacanovic

991 Words | 4 Pages

Rule(s) The government asserted that defendant lied about the reasons for selling stock she owned in ImClone is order to cover up an illegal trade. Also, the government asserted that defendant made materially false statements regarding the sale of the stock with the intention to defraud and deceived investors in order to slow or stop the erosion of the value of her company’s securities.

Read More

Bryan Shaw Case Summary

510 Words | 3 Pages

Scott London crossed a major ethical and legal line by helping Bryan Shaw with his tradings. “By providing Shaw with material, nonpublic information concerning KPMG clients, London breached a duty of trust and confidence that he owed to KPMG and the clients he audited” (U.S. SEC, 2013). In the beginning of their relationship, Shaw was simply looking for help from London as his jewelry store was struggling as a result of the economic downturn. In an interview, London claims that it all happened slowly. At first, the exchange was of public information that any investor would have access to in order to try to make successful trades.

Read More

Essay On Fiduciary Duty

1765 Words | 8 Pages

Wheeler v. The Pullman Iron & Steel Co. provides the particular evaluation standard. It establishes that “The majority of shares of its stock… must be permitted to control the business of the corporation in their discretion,” so long as it does not violate the law or corruptly subvert the rights of a shareholder.” Moreover, since it is “not [the courts’] function to resolve for corporations questions of policy and business management,” they must carefully pinpoint the breaking of law or corruption. For the rest of the board, gross negligence must be proven. Such a standard requires evidence of “reckless indifference to or a deliberate disregard of the whole body of stockholders or actions which are without the bounds of reason.”

Read More

Worldcom Case Summary

1079 Words | 5 Pages

They have produced a flood of various regulatory and legislative responses. Along with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other similar regulations issued by the SEC now the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD both compel corporate CEOs and CFOs to certify the accuracy of financial statements filed with the SEC. This requires listed companies to genuinely adopt corporate governance guidelines or codes of ethics which specifically address the conduct of senior management, directors or officers. It forbids corporations to extend unnecessary credit to their directors or officers and also provides for forfeiture of profits and bonuses from sale of company stock if in case restatements have been made solely as a result of “misconduct” in financial reporting.

Read More

More about Insider Trading: Fair Dealing In The Capital Market

Related Topics

Open Document