ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Justice Ginsburg

1608 Words7 Pages

Justice Ginsburg might be described as Thomas’ polar opposite. Ginsburg voted with the minority liberal bloc in favor of the Federal Election Commission in Citizens United (558 U.S. 310, 316). In every recent case in which the issue was free speech in campaign spending, Ginsburg has voted in favor of stricter restrictions (Washington University Law). She has voted in favor of the Federal Election Commission in every recent case of this issue area, indicating a preference for government restriction of some political speech. She helped to set the precedent in McConnell that Citizens United overturned. Her Martin-Quinn scores have increased in their liberalism since Citizens United from -2.057 to -2.618 (Martin and Quinn 2002). This indicates that she is likely to vote in favor of overturning the precedent in Citizens United. Justice Breyer voted with Ginsburg in the minority in the case (558 U.S. 310, 316). He seems to be less strict than Ginsburg when it comes to free speech in campaign spending issues, as evidenced by his majority opinion in …show more content…

310, 316). However, since she joined the Court in the year before Citizens United, Sotomayor had become increasingly more liberal, with Martin-Quinn scores escalating from -1.555 to -2.645, the most liberal on the Court in 2016 (Martin and Quinn 2002). This indicates that she is exceptionally likely to continue voting with the liberal bloc. Sotomayor has ruled in three cases in addition to Citizens United that have dealt with the issues of campaign styling and free speech, each of which she voted in favor of more government restriction of free speech in campaign spending (Washington University Law). Based on her ideological preferences and voting in other cases, it is probable that Sotomayor will continue voting in opposition to the Citizens United

Show More
Related
1358 Words | 6 Pages

Clinton respected this view, and appointed Breyer to the court. Breyer’s first major case was United States v. Lopez. This case was created to potentially eliminate weapons around schools. This case brought the idea of a strong government to the floor. This case was brought up by the Federalist Society, who had started a new movement called the Constitution in Exile.

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

Sonia Sotomayor was the first Latina Supreme Court Justice in U.S. history. She was nominated by president Barack Obama on May 26, 2009. Sotomayor is a women who got nominated by Barack Obama. She graduated from Yale Law School and passed the bar in 1980. She became a U.S. District Court Judge in 1992 and was elevated to the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 1998.

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

Two justices had a dissent, while four had a concurring opinion. Five justices had the majority

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

Assignment 5: Anita Hill VS Clarence Thomas Introduction In 1991, Thurgood Marshall, the first African American to serve on the nation’s highest court retired. However, before Thurgood Marshall could retire, someone would have to take his place. In 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas as an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court where he would eventually be sworn in on October 23, 1991 (EEOC); But before Clarence Thomas was sworn into the U.S. Supreme Court, a scandal involving a college law professor arose.

Read More
1596 Words | 7 Pages

Chief Justice Jon Roberts and Justice Alito were joined by seven other justices. Those justices included Justice Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. On April 29, 2017 these justices ultimately decided to reverse

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

Ruth Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor both struggled to be able to become judges and over came many challenges to achieve their goals. Ruth Ginsburg struggled trying to become a judge; she was constantly turned down jobs but she kept pushing for what she wanted and got there. Sonia Sotomayor faced many challenges growing up, but with new technology it made her challenges easier and became who she is today. Ruth Ginsburg had to overcome discrimination to achieve what she hoped for. In the text "Ruth Bader Ginsburg" it states, "She was only one of nine women in a class of 600 law students in the late 1950s at Harvard.

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

In "Source 1: Ruth Bader Ginsburg," it says, "In 1980, President Jimmy Carter appointed Ginsburg a Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. She was known as a peacemaker on the court. In 1993, she took her seat as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, having been appointed by President Bill Clinton, and served until her death in 2020. She was only the second woman to be appointed to the Supreme Court. She broke down barriers for American women by showing them how far they can go.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

Upon the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a liberal justice, McConnell saw an opportunity to put in another conservative justice, even though it was closer to the election. This hypocrisy from the Republican party is a political move for them to gain more power across the government. The Constitution does not state the number of SCOTUS justices there can be. If the President wanted, he could nominate dozens of liberal justices and have most of the Senate confirm them so that their political party could be benefited. SCOTUS was never meant to be politicized, and if it continues to be, this will create massive swings on what the law is for our country.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Finally, in 1967, President Johnson appointed Marshall to the Supreme Court. In a mostly conservative Supreme Court, Marshall was an outspoken liberal. During his twenty-four-year tenure, Marshall voted to uphold gender and racial affirmative action policies in every case that involved these policies being contested. In every case in which the Supreme Court voted to not overturn a death sentence, Marshall dissented. Before Marshall’s appointment into the United States Supreme Court, no justice has been so adamant to uphold human rights.

Read More
1096 Words | 5 Pages

As noted in Ruth Bader Ginsburg's entry in the Encyclopedia of World Biography, Marshall's work helped create a legacy of outspokenness that has continued to this day. The legacy of Marshall's work is still being felt today in the efforts of aspiring judges and attorneys who continue to fight for justice in the courts. Former Supreme Court Judge and feminist icon Ginsburg frequently cited Marshall as having a significant effect on her writing. Like Marshall, Ginsburg understood that legal victories were essential for promoting social change. She recognized that the struggle for women's rights and civil rights correlate and fought to ensure that women received equal protection under the law.

Read More
1154 Words | 5 Pages

Scalia voted against the Affordable care act, then voted for same sex marriage the next day because he believe the constitution stood for the right to marry and be happy with anyone you would like. He believed the place for activating change was in the legislature

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

I believe this particular decision was one made in haste and based solely on political preference rather than based on having a fair and impartial electoral process that would benefit society rather than the justices. The Supreme Court stepped in and decided the election for the voters, which was an

Read More
1926 Words | 8 Pages

Justice Marshall wrote in the majority opinion

Read More
320 Words | 2 Pages

With all of the changes taking place in America from the American System, it brought a change also known as the Market Revolution. This meant a change for most of America such as the farmer could focus on growing a main cash crop, and not a variety of things. Farmers looked at the large money corps as cotton and grains and concentrated their efforts on those markets. Consequently, this showed farmers that they were part of the total economic market place. With this change it meant also that the farmers and others was buying what they didn’t produce, making many producers and consumers alike (Schultz, p.170, 2009).

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

Most supreme court justices are biased and act from partisan positions. A partisan is a committed member of their political party: They strongly support their parties policies. Although the supreme court justices should have the option to be able to agree with their party, they should not overlook the actual case. Decision on a case should be because of its background, not solely because a person 's party agreed with it. The supreme court should not be permitted to act on partisan positions.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Justice Ginsburg

Related Topics

Open Document