ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Litigation

1372 Words6 Pages

Casey Brennan 07/03/16 Arbitration v. Litigation What is litigation? What is arbitration? Before we can discuss the pros and cons for either side, you must first understand what each is. Arbitration is the settling of disputes between two parties by an impartial third party, whose decision both parties agree to accept. Litigation on the other hand is the “ultimate legal method of settling controversies or disputes between and among persons, organizations, and the State”. When discussing litigation in layman’s terms most people will understand it to be the process of hiring legal counsel by two opposing parties, the defence and the prosecution. This is usually a lengthy process that involves presenting your case to the court and having it …show more content…

Since both parties are encouraged to participate fully when it comes to finding a resolution, they often tend to work more peacefully rather than increasing their anger or hostility to the other party. Litigation tends to be the opposite as the judge or jury will make the final decision and there is no room left for negotiation. At the end of the litigation process it usually only favours one party. Enforcement of arbitration awards that are international can be difficult. However, it is easier to enforce in countries that are subscribed to certain International …show more content…

There is no set rules or structure that determines whether a case is better to be resolved with arbitration or litigation. Each case is unique and must be treated as such. In conclusion, neither way can be considered better than the other as they both have their own pros and cons. When determining if arbitration or litigation is appropriate for a case, always look at both sides and decide whether the best resolution for the case, not just which way would be the cheapest or the

Show More
Related
396 Words | 2 Pages

In the movie, A Civil Action, the plaintiff’s case began when a group of various parents and families believed that the health related issues and deaths in their city of Woburn was the result of contaminated water. Although the attorney, Jan Schlichtmann, was reluctant to take the case at first because they didn’t have plausible cause, he realized that 2 corporations sat at the border of the river. Mr. Schlichtmann and his firm thus took the case and file a major lawsuit which stated that the the two corporations, Grace and Beatrice, caused wrongful deaths due to the dumping of hazardous waste. The plaintiff side of this case then begins to collect scientific evidence and witness statements in order to prove that both Grace and Beatrice were

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

1. I am an attorney with the law firm of ALAN RIPKA & ASSOCIATES, LLP, the attorneys for Plaintiff Lurline McKenzie Moses herein and as such I am fully familiar with the proceedings and pleadings herein. 2. I make this affirmation in further support of Plaintiff’s cross motion to preclude Defendant’s IME. As Defendant’s original motion for summary judgment is fully briefed, the undersigned will offer no further comment on the merits of that motion herein.

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

The employer alleged that the arbitrator went beyond his authority in shielding the award. The trial court settled the award, and the Court of Appeals held that the employer could not justify its complaints citing the Hall Street opinion. 3. Issue for the court to decide: Does policies include an arbitration clause? In arbitration is that going to continue be

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

You Will Be The Judge Facts: The case involves a 12 year old child named Griffin Grimbly who told the teacher that he was beaten with a clothesline by his father Mr.Gimli. In court, the Mr.Gimli argued that he was devoted to Christian and was following the Biblical injunction on child rearing, “Spare the rod and spoil the child”, as well as arguing that s 43 of the criminal code gives parents the right to use “reasonable force” in disciplining their children. Issue: Is Mr. Grimbly is guilty of or not guilty of assault ? Held: Mr.Grimbly is guilty of assault.

Read More
694 Words | 3 Pages

8. What are the pros and cons concerning regulation of the profession? There are pros and cons to the argument of regulating the paralegal profession. For every argument for regulation there is an argument against regulation.

Read More
844 Words | 4 Pages

COME NOW your Defendants, IVAN DUANE WILLIAMS and DENNIS RAY DAVIS, JR., by counsel, and hereby move to continue the currently scheduled trial date of December 12-14, 2017 pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and in support thereof, state as follows: 1. Defendants are charged with one count of conspiracy to sex traffic minors, and three counts of sex trafficking minors. 2. Discovery in this matter is voluminous. Numerous law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, Henrico County Police, and Fairfax County Police have been investigating this case for over a year and over multiple jurisdictions, including various locations in Maryland, Virginia, and Georgia.

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

In response to arraignment, the accused is expected to enter a plea. In the Lindberg Baby Case, throughout the arraignment the defendant was charged with kidnapping and murder. Adjudication is the legal process by which an arbiter or judge reviews evidence and argumentation, including legal reasoning set forth by opposing parties or litigants to come to a decision which determines rights and obligations between the parties involved. In the last part of the adjudication process, the judge agrees on the ratio decidendi which is the ground or reason for a decision.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

When two people are involved in a dispute the scope is way less then when two countries are disagreeing. A major necessity is that both parties have to be willing to sit down and want to talk things out. Some keys

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

The American Civil Liberties Union or better known as the ACLU has been around for almost a hundred years know. The ACLU derived from the National Civil Liberties Bureau which was co-founded in 1917 during the World War 1 by an attorney activist Crystal Eastman, and Roger Nash Baldwin. The focus of the CLB was on primarily anti-was speech, freedom of speech, and on supporting people who did not want to serve in World War 1. Now, during the time of November 1919 and January 1920 there were raids called the “Palmer Raids.” An attorney general by the name of Mitchell Palmer began rounding up and deporting people.

Read More
1839 Words | 8 Pages

By agreement of the both parties, the litigation has focused

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

Yi Ding BUSN201-86N Ms. Richards 19 June 2016 Tort reform Nowadays, tort reform is a controversial problem in the United States. By comparing the pros and cons of tort reform from different aspects, I think that tort reform is necessary. The textbook, “Business law today” (2014), clarifies that tort is a wrongful act that results in harm or injury to another and leads to civil liability.

Read More
1838 Words | 8 Pages

Courts-martial were trials conducted by the U.S. military or by state militaries. Most commonly, courts-martial are convened to try members of the U.S. military for criminal violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which is the U.S. military 's criminal code. However, they can also be convened for other purposes, including military tribunals and the enforcement of martial law in an occupied territory. Federal courts-martial are governed by the rules of procedure and evidence laid out in the Manual, which contains the Rules for Courts-Martial, Military Rules of Evidence, and other guidance. State courts-martial are governed according to the laws of the state concerned.

Read More
245 Words | 1 Pages

What is the “Due Process?” The due process is a fair Treatment through the normal Judicial system, especially as a citizen’s entitlement It respect all legal rights that are balances the power of law of land and protects the individual person. What does it do?

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

Today our justice system has a multitude of options when dealing with those who are convicted of offenses. However, many argue that retributive justice is the only real justice there is. This is mainly because its advantage is that it gives criminals the appropriate punishment that they deserve. The goals of this approach are clear and direct. In his book The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Zehr Howard (2002), illustrates that the central focus of retributive justice is offenders getting what they deserve (p. 30).

Read More
3020 Words | 13 Pages

Introduction Civil Justice System The civil justice system exists in order to enable individuals, businesses, and local and central government to vindicate, and where necessary, enforce their civil legal rights and obligations, whether those rights are private or public. It ensures that the rights and protection of citizens are called for. The rule of law dictates that government should not abuse their powers as per AV Dicey’s concept of the rule of law. In addition, the civil courts endorse economic activity, allowing contracts to be made between strangers because rights are taken care of in the courts if they are breached.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Litigation

Related Topics

Open Document