Pros And Cons Of Mongols

Nomads traipsed across Afro-Eurasia from the classical through the post-classical period, grazing their herds, attacking and conquering kingdoms and empires, and exchanging military technology for goods produced in more settled locales. Some groups such as the Huns moved into Western Europe and brought down the Roman Empire. The Khitans were more of a vague worry to the Chinese dynasties, although sometimes they needed to build walls. Other groups included the Uighurs, the Comans, and the Jerchens. Mongols were an important nomadic group in the post-classical period, although others existed. While they brutally attacked and conquered large swaths of Eurasia, they also advanced economic systems and promoted security in a way that allowed for

Mongols slew all they attacked, according to the Christian monk in doc 2. As a Christian, he would be appalled at the breaking of the commandment about not killing people. The Russians corroborated the claim that they destroyed towns and slaughtered people (3). Even though the Christian Friar John recounts relentless slaughter, sometimes the Mongols were less violent in conquering.... Chinggis Khan sent an agent to defeat eleven kingdoms and tribes on his way to Kiev before establishing rule over many of those locations through administrative delegates (6). In continuity of not always killing everyone, the Russian princes were spared as long as... However, not all nomads were able to conquer. The Uighurs were forced to submit to the Tang general, and although they harassed the Song and Sui as well, they often observed diplomacy as depicted in Doc 7, sometimes in the interest of exchanging horses for silk and other goods created in urban places. Also, the Uighurs who had been nomadic in the Tang and Song dynasties had become settled and educated by the time of the Yuan dynasty. They were part of the resettlement process the Mongols used once they had