ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Narrow Network Health Care

1077 Words5 Pages

Despite the controversial nature of narrow network health plans, they have gained significant traction since the enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010, especially in the individual market. Narrow network health plans, which consist of a reduced panel of physicians and hospitals are essentially a form of selective contracting used by insurers to manage their costs. Insurers purport that these plans offer consumers the best of both worlds, specifically, lower premiums and a network of high-quality healthcare providers. However, many consumers are unaware of this limited network until after they have purchased their plan (Demko, 2014), when they are confronted with the harsh reality of not being able to see the provider of their choice. …show more content…

Background:
Narrow network health plans are defined by Fair Health as plans that have a lower monthly premium and as a trade-off, a limited choice of providers (Fair Health, 2017). However, the Urban Institute elaborates on this definition by outlining the fact that narrow networks are established using cost and in some cases quality criteria to select health care providers from a broad provider network. The implementation of strong incentives are then put in place to encourage consumers to obtain care from just that set of providers (Delbanco, Murray, Berenson, & Upadhyay, 2016).
Neither of the previous definitions of narrow networks portrays just how limited the choice of providers may be or what the incentives are. A study by McKinsey in 2014 goes much further by defining a narrow network as one that includes 31% - 70% of all hospitals in a participating area and an ultra-narrow network is defined as having less than 30% of all hospitals in a particular area (McKinsey & Company, 2014). While the McKinsey & Company’s study evaluates hospital coverage, a study by Polsky & Weiner assesses physician participation in narrow network plans. Polsky and Weiner find that the majority, i.e. 41% of networks are small or extra small which by their definition means that they include less than 10% of office-based physicians in the area (Polsky & Weiner, 2015). Consumers are incentivized to seek care inside the limited network by the application of a generous in-network benefits in …show more content…

First of all, many of the strategies used by insurers to attract healthier members and to manage their costs, for example, health status underwriting and the elimination of lifetime and annual maximums, were prohibited by the ACA. Therefore, selective contracting in the form of limited provider contracts and less generous benefits are the few available mechanisms insurers can employ with the same goal of attracting healthier patients and in turn containing costs in the individual Marketplace. What’s more, there is a high level of transparency for consumers in evaluating the differences in price between plans on the exchange which created an incentive for insurers to offer a lower cost option (Giovannell, et al.,

Show More
Related
549 Words | 3 Pages

“Renee Laux & Laura Jean Cataldo (2013) reports A major disadvantage to the patient of an HMO is that his or her preferred health care provider may not have a contract with that HMO and therefore, if the patient wants to see that particular provider, he or she would have to pay for the visits out of pocket. Another disadvantage of HMOs can be that providers may end up being at a financial disadvantage because of the reduced fees required to contract with the HMO. In some areas, this has led to very few healthcare providers contracting with certain HMOs and thus the members of the HMO have very little choice in whom to see.”

Read More
264 Words | 2 Pages

Over 28 million people in the world receive health insurance through the Medicare program (Gornick, n.d.). The medicare program was designed to operate throughout the nation with a set of uniformed benefits and cost-sharing requirements in the form of deductibles and coinsurance. However, over the years the program data indicated that the Medicare premiums and deductibles, benefits paid out varied significantly by state of residence of the beneficiary (Gornick, n.d.). These variations are due to part of the fact that reimbursements are based on local physicians' prices. Many policy analysts suggested that the geographic variations in Medicare reimbursements should be reduced (Gornick, n.d.).

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

Prior to the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), few people anticipated employer-provided health care would disappear as a major player in the United State healthcare arena. However, ACA adoption and has put more than 169 million employees at risk for losing their workplace coverage. Several studies indicate employer-based coverage will decline rapidly over the next decade as the traditional US system is displaced by the healthcare exchange system. While consumers grapple with finding affordable coverage options and providers adjust to the new norms, there is another wrinkle in the mix. In January, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sylvia M. Burwell announced the agency's push toward value-based and alternative reimbursement models.

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

Although this is under Obamacare exchanges, it shows that state-run exchanges can effectively control the cost of premiums. A state that has efficiently and effectively controlled the health insurance markets is California. Through their state-run exchanges, California has managed to control the type and price of care provided by setting up a system that required all health insurers to provide the same deductibles and benefits within each of their coverage levels (Scheffler, Para. 7). Their plan is set up so that “insurers in all marketplaces must offer a defined set of “essential health benefits” in all plans and may offer plans at four coverage levels: platinum…followed in descending order of cost and coverage benefits by gold, silver, and bronze. ”(Scheffler, Para. 7)

Read More
777 Words | 4 Pages

The Affordable Care Act doesn’t create a competitive insurance market – as promised. A. The new health was created to bridge the gap between patients and providers. However, 20% (1 in 5) of Americans live in areas with shortages of primary care physicians. Customers are facing the unfortunate reality of calling multiple providers in their networks and being informed that physicians are not taking new patients.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

Medicare Kelsey Reinholt SOC 400 10/22/2015 Les Lazarevic ABSTRACT The focus of this paper is to provide knowledge over the Medicare and its requirements. This paper explains some challenges that might occur with the choices on Traditional Medicare, with Medicare+Choice, there is usually an incentive financially or at least an encouragement for a transfer to the private sector for little to no cost. Medicare and Medicaid, two publicly funded health programs, both cover populations in need of long-term care, but they are poorly coordinated.

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

A requirement for people to maintain “continuous coverage”—to take an example supported by the new Secretary of Health and Human Services, Tom Price, and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan—would mean that people who lose their insurance temporarily, because they, say, change jobs or suffer a financial setback, would also lose their preëxisting-condition protections. For these people and for others left behind, Price and Ryan advocate state-run “high-risk pools.” But, in the thirty-five states that offered high-risk pools to the uninsurable before the A.C.A., inadequate funding delivered terrible coverage, with extremely high premiums and deductibles, and annual limits as low as seventy-five thousand dollars. Hardly anyone signed

Read More
1513 Words | 7 Pages

Currently, the two main atrocities of Obamacare include the cost and the fact that making Americans purchase government issued healthcare was micromanaging. Based on the research surrounding the opposition to Obamacare, an improved plan could be funded in part by changes in the tax money. Making the top 5 percent of earners pay a more fair share and reducing the lower and middle-class population’s share would balance the costs and make it more affordable. Also with some of the tax money, a government non-profit insurance company could be established to offer more choices. Some research points to interest in letting people shop for their preferred insurance plan nationally as well instead of having to remain an in-state consumer.

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

Americans have the opportunity to choose a health care insurance that works best for them. For example, the insurance exchange offers affordable choices of private plans that have to compete with their business which is determined by cost and quality. They also receive a tax credit that helps with the cost of paying for their employees’ health insurance. The Act also considers Medicare as one of their priorities. In order to give the best quality of care for senior adults and lower the cost, the Act saves thousands of dollars in drug costs by closing the coverage gap known as the “donut hole.”

Read More
1300 Words | 6 Pages

Yet, the new replacement plans raises costs for the older Americans. Unlike the GOP plan, Obamacare limits how much insurers can charge this demographic, stating that they can only charge them up to three times the amount as young Americans (Zurcher). Mainly due to retirees not having a steady income, Obamacare has put this cap on how much insurers can charge. With older American’s health deteriorating and needing more health care, they are able to receive the care they need without having to pay for it all out of savings. With the GOP replacement plan, insurers can charge the older population up to five times the amount of younger consumers of health care and can let the states choose their own ratio (Zurcher).

Read More
1133 Words | 5 Pages

Is it possible for doctors to provide better care at a lower cost? Is it ethical to mandate individuals to get insurance by violating their right to choose? Four fundamental goals have shaped our health care system. First, we want high-quality care that can provide the greatest benefits. Second, we want freedom of choice so that we can decide the “who, when, and where” for our health care.

Read More
1146 Words | 5 Pages

For us here in the United States, the focus will be on setting minimum standards across the nation without limiting individuals from buying higher coverage if that is their preference. In addition, individuals and families will be getting higher coverage, better access to treatment and quality health care. The beauty of this plan is that it works; many nations that use the single payer system with an explicit national health program allow individuals to purchase additional insurance or care using their own resources (Gruber, 2009). Unfortunately, the system in the United States does not quite work like that; many individuals are left in the lurch because there is no minimum standard that is acceptable across the board (Gruber, 2009). We have several extremes here in the States; one extreme is that millions of Americans have only subsidized health care coverage, another extreme is the

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

The law that was intended to improve the status quo of health care has, in essence, caused a dangerous paradigm shift in health care costs. Fundamentally, the Affordable Care Act is a failed attempt to reduce health care costs in the United States. The Act was designed to increase affordability of health insurance for extremely low-income families; nevertheless, the Act exponentially increased health insurance costs for the majority of Americans. In America, majority rules-- why should health care be an

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

The United States is the only Western nation that does not authorize free health services to its people. The cost of healthcare to the uninsured is beyond prohibitive, and insurance plans are far more captivated with profit costs, rather

Read More
367 Words | 2 Pages

Many Americans were led to believe that the introduction of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2009 would put an end to disparities in health care access. While it did improve the situation for a small percentage of the population there are still many Americans who lack access to good quality health care. Health care access in America is determined by money and those in lower socioeconomic groups frequently tend to miss out on adequate care. In a recent health care report by the national health research foundation Kaiser Family Foundation, it was noted “health care disparities remain a persistent problem in the United States, leading to certain groups being at higher risk of being uninsured, having limited access to care, and experiencing poorer quality of care” (Kaiser Family Foundation). The current health care

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Narrow Network Health Care

Related Topics

Open Document