ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Negotiate With Terrorists

1204 Words5 Pages

Why Do States Negotiate With Terrorists: Realism And Liberalism Approaches
Hostage situations place people under seizure, so that they act as security, in exchange for a fulfillment of certain given conditions. Every hostage situation is unique and it requires a lot of flexibility and creativity. Ordinarily, nations would chose to implement military rescue strategies, which present the highest risk of deaths, but when it comes to matters of life and death, nations would rather capitulate than sacrifice hostages to horrific deaths. This essay looks at the issues of terrorism and the question on whether to negotiate or not, based on international security and international relation theories of realism and liberalism.
Security
The concept of national security assumes that the government of a nation protects the state and its citizens from crises, such as attacks. This protection can be ensured through diplomacy, military forces or economic power as well. International security is quite similar to the concepts of national security. In both cases it refers …show more content…

For example states are not always in need to be involved into violence. Another contrast perspective suggests that terrorists should not be awarded for using terrorism as a deal. The supporters of negotiations believe that negotiation is an effective tool in the way that it delays the whole process for some time, time in which you might find other good solutions and options to solve the issue. The opposers of negotiations with terrorists on the other hand believe that being involved into violence somehow, means that the international efforts to outlaw terrorism will be invalid. They also believe that negotiations portrays weakness, which needs to be avoided at any time in order to represent a powerful position. Further, they maintain that the political systems of the state might be

Show More
Related
1407 Words | 6 Pages

Employers have a broad scope of what issues they may cover in a mandatory arbitration agreement. This broad scope was first established by the Supreme Court when it held that claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) could be subject to mandatory arbitration. See Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20, 111 S. Ct. 1647, 114 L. Ed. 2d 26 (1991). Following the ruling in Gilmer, most courts have held that other federal statutes, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), are subject to mandatory arbitration as well.

Read More
1419 Words | 6 Pages

Throughout this essay, I will analyze four different interviews of Bob Archer, Travis D’Ambrosia, Whako, and Ernesto Olguin and analyze the individual, state, and international levels of analysis, as well as their varying realist and liberalist theoretical approach, and explain other approaches that are inferior. II. Interview 1: a. Topic sentence: First, the interviewer discusses the crisis with the director of the CIA, Bob Archer. Archer gives insight of the event with China and the CIA, and during the interview, Archer discusses the individual level of analysis and take a realist approach to his job during the war. b.

Read More
1609 Words | 7 Pages

Safety and security has gone back to members we used to call the “watchman” who were some of the first figures we started to develop as law enforcement figures to keep the society safe (Schmalleger 6). This is so important in today 's world as it tries to sure up fairness for life, land, and the pursuit of happiness, as it states in the United States’ Declaration of independence. This is such an important concept to have in our society as the US became somewhat of a model for the rest of the world after our declaration. This need for safety and security also stretches into the reasons for why we have our military. For obvious reason as keeping our country safe to the reasons of us still interacting in other countries to allow them and their people work towards having a fair system of which they can feel safe and secure.

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

In chapter four the author Stephen McGlinchey he explains how International Relations has helped us understand the world around us in various ways through different theoretical perspectives (McGlinchey,46). He first starts of talking about Immanuel Kant who developed the theory of liberals, which is people who have no intentions to go to war with other states (McGlinchey,47). Liberalism in International Relations is known as a “utopian” which basically means a country that lives in peace no IR conflicts (McGlinchey,47). McGlinchey also talks about the theory of realism, a theory created by Thomas Hobbes (McGlinchey,48). Hobbes describes realism as people who are “all against all’ and accept the fact that International Relations change and that

Read More
1485 Words | 6 Pages

Scholars of International Relations have been studying John Herz’s Security Dilemma (SD) since the 1950s and it has become an essential part of the realist IR theory. Herz’s description of “a structural notion in which the self-help attempts of states to look after their security needs tend, regardless of intention, to lead to rising insecurity for others as each interprets its own measures as defensive and measures of others as potentially threatening” (Herz 1951, p.7) has aided scholars to analyse complex political situations where this Dilemma has triggered outcomes such as WW1. Nevertheless, there are several voices reconsidering if the SD is still applicable to the issues politics has to face today, terrorism being one of them. This leads us to the following statement: “The rise of transnational terrorism has transformed the Security Dilemma”. In the following essay I will argue that transnational terrorism, along with historical factors, has indeed slightly transformed the SD but that its true essence remains the same.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

The security dilemma is an axiom of international relations: as one state takes action to make itself more secure, it threatens the security of others as one can never be sure of another ’s intentions. In this essay, I will discuss the events that give rise to the security dilemma, implications for international relations according to Structural Realists, Liberalism with Democratic Peace Theory and Liberal Institutionalism as means to mitigate this problem, and how the United States and China can use these two paradigms to ameliorate tensions between the two states. Structural Realists claim that one principle underlies most problems in international relations, including the security dilemma: anarchy.

Read More
2260 Words | 10 Pages

Looking back over the development of the Security Studies field, there can be no doubt that the realist tradition has exercised enormous influence. Even the harshest of critics can acknowledge that with their focus on power, fear, and anarchy, realist theories have provided centrally important explanations for conflict and war (Williams, 2013). One interpretation of realism that is unbroken amongst most commentators of the theory is that realists are individuals that believe the State is the principle actor in international politics and that they are very concerned with the balance of power (Marsalis, 2013). They argue that all the State’s actions and choices are a reflection of the collective will of the people, which is also an argument

Read More
1338 Words | 6 Pages

A typical example is seen in the case where Jimmy Carter negotiated for the release of 52 US citizens held hostage by Islamic extremists in Tehran’s US embassy Irish. Also the British governments held a series of negotiations with both the IRA and UDA to broker peace and end the Troubles in Northern Ireland. Even the current Netanyahu led government in Israel, with its hard-line stance on terrorism, is currently in negotiations with Hamas for the release of IDF Sergeant Gilad Shalit, kidnapped by Hamas forces over a year

Read More
1179 Words | 5 Pages

Alea Ortiguerra IDS 4315-0W59 Perspectives Three major perspectives exist in the realm of International Relations. The first, which is Realism, emphasizes mostly on conflict between states and the power they hold. Realists believe that anarchy is what causes war due to the decentralized distribution of power within the international system. Liberalism, the second major perspective, contrasts with Realism by focusing more on cooperation and interactions between states and how they relate to one another based on repetitive processes. Liberal theory is based on the assumption that groups behave differently depending on the basis of how other groups behave towards them.

Read More
897 Words | 4 Pages

Idealism and Realism are two strongly opposed views of foreign policy. At the core of this opposition is the issue of power and security in politics. Realism establishes a separation between politics and ethics in order to understand and comprehend international events. Realists don’t oppose morality to politics, nor power to law, but rather oppose the utopian peaceful society to the nature of society.

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

Conflict resolution as a field of study as indicated has formed hypothetical bits of knowledge into the nature and source of conflict and how conflicts can be resolved through peaceful systems to effectuate a dependable settlement. Morton Deutsch, was the first to form and understanding into the helpful results of collaboration as a scholastic enquiry. In his view, various variables like the way of the debate and the objectives every group in a conflict goes for are crucial in deciding the sort of introduction a group would convey to the negotiation table in its endeavor to unravel the conflict (Morton Deucth, 1985, p.24). To him, two essential orientations do exist. These are competitive and cooperative.

Read More
1087 Words | 5 Pages

National defence and security strategy are formulated through some fundamental considerations based on the security objectives and national interests. National defence and security policy refers to the government’s vision and mission that are realized proportionally, balanced and well-coordinated. To achieve this goal, the government has developed a national defence and national security strategy. “It includes strategic objectives, how to achieve the goals and defence resources in order to accomplish strong, effective and high deterrence state defence capabilities” . Based on that phenomenon, Darmono B. further described regarding the Indonesian national security concepts (Darmono, 2010): 1.

Read More
1282 Words | 6 Pages

Assess the claim that Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism have far more similarities than differences. Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism, two of the most influential contemporary approaches to international relations, although similar in some respects, differ multitudinously. Thus, this essay will argue it is inaccurate to claim that Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism have far more similarities than differences. On the contrary, it will contend that there are, in an actual fact, more of the latter than there are of the former on, for example, the nature and consequences of anarchy, the achievement of international cooperation, and the role of international institutions. Moreover, it will be structured in such a way so as to corroborate this line of argument.

Read More
1938 Words | 8 Pages

The current work is meant to explain the differences and similarities between the most dominant theories in international relations, Realism and Liberalism, both theories have some similarities and differences but much more important and interesting is to discuss and explain what differs and makes similar both theories. Conflicts and wars, Similarities and differences between Realism and Liberalism: Both Liberalism and Realism believes that there is no world government that can prevent countries to go to war on one another. For both theories military power is important and both Realism and Liberalism can understand that countries can use military power to get what they need or want. Also, both theories are conscious that without military

Read More
1381 Words | 6 Pages

The international relations schools of thought known as Realism and Idealism identify specific and similar characteristics of actors in the conceptual development of their theories. While many of these characteristics can be generalized as being synonymous with the two theories, both theories make a separate distinction in what specifically constitutes an actor. In Realism, the term “actor” refers directly and solely to the state: a combination of government, leaders, decision-makers, etc, that act as a unitary entity to promote the interests of the state. Idealists, however, expand on what constitutes an actor to include both the state and people. Not only do the principles of Idealism assert that the state and people should be considered actors, in fact, both they must be viewed as actors.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Negotiate With Terrorists

Related Topics

Open Document