ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Stop, Question And Frisk Policy

928 Words4 Pages

Tiana McCroskey
Criminal Procedure
Jamal Lopez
04, March 2016

Stop, Question and Frisk policy
Stop, question, and frisk is an NYPD policy where a police officer can detain a suspect, question them and frisk them by patting down the suspect’s clothing based off reasonable suspicion. (Washington post).Stop and frisk policy is a controversial issue due to the rise of disagreement with in the public. Are the reforms to stop and frisk policy making New York City dangerous again? In order to answer that question we must first have to analyze the pros and cons of the policy to determine a proper answer for the question. Let’s first take a look at some positive attributes of this policy. The stop question and frisk policy was created in order to reduce …show more content…

Some say that stop and frisk policy is harmless unless someone is actually committing or has committed a crime. But there are plenty of incidents that has occurred due to this policy that proves that this isn’t true. One major incident is that stop question and frisk policy was that it was unconstitutional. According to Scheindlin, The New York Police Department has performed 4.4 million stops from 2004 to 2012 and 80 percent of the people frisked was reportedly blacks and Hispanics. This policy was used to racially profile against people of a particular race rather than prevent crime. Which in fact was the sole reason why this policy was banned and viewed as a violation to the fourteenth amendment of the U.S Constitution which provides equal protection to all against the government. Another concern in regards to the policy was the number of deaths due to this policy unsurprisingly most victims was of African descent. For example Amadou Diallo, who was a West African unarmed man who was shot over 40 times by four police officers because he matched a rape suspect description. Police officers felt that he was reaching for a gun when he was in fact reaching for his wallet and was killed in cold blood right in front of his apartment building. If the policy was created to be as a safety precaution for New Yorkers why is it that people are losing their lives to it rather than being saved? The bottom line is

Show More
Related
557 Words | 3 Pages

In response to public outcries to do more interventions in the community, the officers maintained that Floyd's behavior was suspicious and there had been a burglary pattern for that time of day in the neighborhood. The officers recorded Floyd's Stop and Frisk on the controversial UF250 form (Stop, Question and Frisk Report Worksheet), indicating that the suspected crime was a burglary. In response to the question “Was person searched?”, during the trial, the officers checked “No.” The three officers also claimed that they were unaware of any quotas or expectations that they complete a certain number of stops or UF250.

Read More
643 Words | 3 Pages

Race has assumed a major part is these inquiries also. Out of the 114 police stops, a shocking 96 were African-American residents, and 30% of those 96 stops were more than liable to be illegal, contrasted with 22% of whites that were ceased. Ruthlessness has likewise been an issue connected with these unlawful movement stops. It 's so basic between cops that there 's an inclination for rehashed misuse of force and it 's fundamentally transformed into the "standard".

Read More
1451 Words | 6 Pages

The police were overusing this tactic to aggressively made police stops. Data shows that stop-and-frisk was getting extremely worse and the number of police stops that was being conducted is due to racial profiling. After a successful campaign, new legislations were introduce that will have an inspector to oversee NYPD and would allow citizens to sue the

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

The safety of the community is crucial and attempting to deam stop and frisk as unconstitutional limits law enforcement. There is much controversy on how it can target a certain group or race but I believe the goal of any police is to deter crime when implementing stop and frisk. I believe stop and frisk can help reduce crimes and eliminate potential crime in a city, neighborhood, or street. Boyette, C., & Martinez, M. (2013).

Read More
1113 Words | 5 Pages

2005, An Analysis of the NYPD 's stop and frisk policy in the context of the claim of racial bias by Andrew Gelman, Jeffrey Fagan, Alex Kiss is about the NYPD records of indicated that they were stopping black and Hispanics more often that they were stopping whites. Minorities are stopped twice as often for violent crimes and a weapons offense. Lower "hit rates" for non-whites is suggested as the targeting of minorities while another suggests dynamics of racial stereotyping and a more passive form of racial preference. Racial Incongruity stops in high rates of minority stop in predominantly white precincts. Being out of place is often a reason for suspicion.

Read More
1147 Words | 5 Pages

Summary Of Argument, Methods: In 1968, stop and frisk was based on strict guidelines that explained how far an officer can frisk someone according to the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Behind the police officers’ stop and frisks, the strategies of broken windows policing and the zero-tolerance policy were introduced. Broken windows theory began in New York during the year of 1982, and former Mayor Giuliani of New York created zero-tolerance policy in 1997. Broken windows was a known policing strategy throughout all departments in the nation.

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

Not to mention all the undocumented people that feel oppressed by officers and scared to talk back to them with a “no”. In chapter two, the author presents a section titled Just Say No. In this section the author illustrates a time where two police officers stopped a bus to search for drugs. Police officers never warned individuals that they had the right to remain silent and, therefore, minorities were trapped and found guilty for carrying drugs. In addition, the book discusses the Florida vs Botsick case that states that people have the right to refuse answering the police.

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

"Stop and frisk" should stop because innocent people are getting blamed because of harmful people 's action. In the article " 'Stop and Frisk ' Myth Busters," research shows, "Nine out of ten people

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

The job of the police officers is to protect all citizens from any threat and help us to be safe on the streets. Stop and frisk is a practice that the New York City Police Department uses as a way to fight crime, however, stop and frisk is unjust and has resulted in racial discrimination by officers, as well as an abuse of power. Over the years many civilians have been stopped and frisked by the police, this irritates some people as they feel they are stopped purposely or for no reason. So can police frisking in some cases go too far?

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

“Racial profiling punishes innocent individuals for the past actions of those who look and sound like them…” - Benjamin Todd Jealous. Is it okay how in today 's society many innocent people are stopped by the police because of their race? Is it okay how many innocent people are often killed or injured because of their race? It’s not okay for people of color to be targeted by authorities because they “look suspicious”. The fact that this is an actual real world problem going on right now is disgusting.

Read More
139 Words | 1 Pages

Racial profiling is not justified , many cops should not have to shoot , run after , or even arrest someone due to race. This resolves to the term "Racism" and many people are still racist which lead cops and even citizens to act upon someone a different race than they are. The cost and benefits of racial profiling in not really beneficial but the cost is many innocent lives taken away from a trigger and a man with a badge. So whats there to do ? How can we stop this ?

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

Stop and Frisk Stop and Frisk, the tactic that has been going on for only for short time, yet there seems to be racial tension already. But is this new information actually true or is it just good policing? According to Heather Mac Donald from the Manhattan Institute, says “what looks like racial profiling might just be good policing”. However according to Ranjana Natarajan from the Washington post “it’s clear that two issues need to be addressed: racial profiling and police use of excessive force.” Unfortunately we cannot have both ways.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

There has been many controversial issues about the “stop-and-frisk” law. One side believes that it is racially profiling the communities of minorities and the other side believes that it is helping communities rise away from violence. There is a lot of history and background on stop-and-frisk and how it originated in the United States, especially in different places around the world. This law has been very controversial even within the law itself, so controversial states are debating on getting rid of it completely. Many politicians speak on this tactic in both positive and negative ways and the statistical growths and decreases on this topic.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

Racial profiling has become a national issue starting in 2015 (“Racial”). Judging someone for their race has been a problem ever since a minority group has been noticed. Racial profiling has spread over all over the world. Racial profiling has been a problem through the years, if the human race can learn what racial profiling is, advantages of the profiling, and the disadvantages.

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

Racial profiling is a very important issue that individuals in society face every day. This problem occurs in low income or poverty-stricken areas throughout cities and communities across the nation. Hundreds of anecdotal testimonials allege that law enforcement officials at all levels of government are infringing upon the constitutional rights and civil liberties of racial and ethnic minorities through a practice called “racial profiling” (Ward, 2002). So what is racial profiling? According to the National Institute of Justice, racial profiling by law enforcement is commonly defined as a practice that targets people for suspicion of crime based on their race, ethnicity, religion or national origin (National Institute of Justice, 2013).

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Stop, Question And Frisk Policy

Related Topics

Open Document