Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The history of voting rightsessay
The history of voting rightsessay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The history of voting rightsessay
The history of voting rightsessay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The history of voting rightsessay
Since the population has a lack of education, we do not think americans have the ability to vote wisely. We think
The Votes that Should Count The United States should abolish the Electoral College, by amending the Constitution, and use the Direct Popular Vote process for presidential elections. Though the U.S. Constitution Article two, section one, clause two states that the appointment of electors belong exclusively to the states (National Conference of State Legislator), it is seemingly pointless to carry out national voting polls of the public if only electoral college votes will hold the count for the next elected president. Every three years around the United States, candidates who decide to run for the seat of presidency begin their campaign to win the votes of Americans, but for what?
Abrogate the Electoral College immediately. The Electoral College is a formal body of 538 electors who determine the President and Vice President of the United States of America. The system was established in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution for the reason of keeping a balance between the election of the President by a vote in Congress and a popular vote of citizenry. Copious amounts of controversy have been surrounding the subject ever since its date of inauguration. The Electoral College should be abolished because it does not serve democracy, the presidential outcome is able to be altered by just the Electoral College–not the majority–and an appreciable amount of the U.S. population believes the Electoral College should be terminated.
It was November 8th, 2017, also known as, Election Day in the U.S. At exactly 2:00 it had been announced that Hillary Clinton had won the popular vote, but the election was not over yet. 2:30. It had been announced that Trump had won the presidential election to the shock of many, prompting the question, is the electoral college was really the best way to decide elections? Yes.
A debate that has existed in American politics for centuries has flared up again. The debate in question is whether we should keep our Electoral College for the purpose of electing our President or abolish it and elect our Presidents through a popular vote. Those who seek to abolish the Electoral College cite instances -recent and past- in which Presidential Candidates have won the popular vote yet lost the majority of the Electoral College. They also argue that the undemocratic philosophy behind the Electoral College, the thought that the American people aren’t competent enough to choose their own Commander in Chief, is an outdated remnant of a backwards past that has no place in modern society and law. Those who seek to preserve the Electoral
Voter ID laws are two sided, but most Americans feel that it is necessary to prevent voter fraud. Republicans feel that an individual should already have a state ID because this is required by so many government agencies. Unfortunately, the Democrats are the ones to be most likely affected due to their voters’ economic status, disabilities and age. Whereas, Democrats believe that it is a tactic to defer their supporters from voting.
Changes to the United States Constitution To better connect with 21st century cultural needs and the political wishes of the people, I would amend the constitution by doing away with the electoral college, adding in an equal rights amendment that encompasses all people regardless of any criteria, and by making the district of Columbia a state as well as granting them the right to vote in Congress. These changes are essential to the rapidly changing times that we live in and are necessary to keep all United States citizens happy with the government. Abolishing the electoral college would greatly benefit the United States. The electoral college is unfair and unconstitutional because the people of the United States do not elect presidents, states
According to Angela Stampey, photo IDs would stop voter fraud. The United States democracy is at risk when we cannot trust our election results. Voter fraud is real, and because of this our election polls cannot be trusted. Angela Stampey suggests citizens need to require photo identification at the polls.
Democracy is a foundation of a country’s success. The idea of mandatory voting goes against the democracy of the United States. Mandatory voting is a violation to our civil rights and will become a law in the United States. Although many people believe that mandatory voting helps to strengthen a democratic government by making more voters participate in political process. However, mandatory voting violates the democratic United States by restricting people’s rights.
What is Compulsory Voting? Compulsory voting is a system in which electors are obligated to vote in elections and attend a polling place on the voting day. If an eligible voter does not attend a polling booth, or cast a postal vote, he or she may be subjected to a penalty which may be a fine or community service.
Now they teach politics in schools so that the students can understand how politics work. We may never know, those younger votes can make a difference in society. Younger children deserve to vote too. They understand politics because they teach in their schools now. They age to vote should be sixteen and above.
Voting to elect public officials is one of the most invaluable right available to a citizen in a democratic society. The act of expressing a preference for certain candidates enable individuals to exercise their collective power in electing representatives who truly stand for their interests. Through voting, people realize the basic principles of democracy and establish a government of the people, by the people and for the people. In countries where voting is a compulsory duty of every citizen, voter turnout is between 70% and 90%. In addition, voter turnout in the U.S. is only 50%.
While mandatory voting can violate an American's freedom of choice, the effects of it on the country would be helpful in many ways. Mandatory voting other known as compulsory voting is legal in 22 countries. But there is one country that doesn't follow--America. With mandatory voting, countries receive a greater amount of votes with increasing accuracy. If the United States incorporates mandatory voting in their current voting system, it will improve our country for the better politically, economically, and socially.
“A vote is like a rifle, its usefulness depends upon the character of the user.” - Theodore Roosevelt” Do we need uneducated, random, and altogether unconstitutional forced votes clogging up our ballot? Those rallying for compulsory voting boast better representation of the lower class. If compulsory voting is so grand then please do explain why so many countries (the majority even.)
Others argue that it helps to protect everyone’s right to vote and ensure that no one takes someone else’s right. There is a way to make sure everyone is able to vote but their vote is also protected from