Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College

863 Words4 Pages

Abrogate the Electoral College immediately. The Electoral College is a formal body of 538 electors who determine the President and Vice President of the United States of America. The system was established in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution for the reason of keeping a balance between the election of the President by a vote in Congress and a popular vote of citizenry. Copious amounts of controversy have been surrounding the subject ever since its date of inauguration. The Electoral College should be abolished because it does not serve democracy, the presidential outcome is able to be altered by just the Electoral College–not the majority–and an appreciable amount of the U.S. population believes the Electoral College should be terminated. The Electoral College does not accurately align with the ways of a Democratic society. The idea of ‘Democracy’ was different when the Constitution was created and as an ever-changing country, we must establish laws that fit our time period and put an end to the ones that don’t. Presidents being elected despite losing the popular vote goes against the definition of democracy according to Oxford Languages, “Control …show more content…

While completely disregarding the majority’s votes, the president and vice president can single handedly be decided by the Electoral College. As a result, the only purpose of having a voting system in place for ordinary citizens is to make them feel as if they have a significant impact on decisions for the country. According to the Pew Research Center, 15 former U.S. presidents were all elected on the independent strength of the Electoral College. It’s relatively straightforward enough to overturn the entire presidential outcome with a single electoral college vote, as demonstrated in 1876: “Rutherford B. Hayes wins the presidential election by one electoral vote. He loses the popular vote to Samuel Tilden,”(SIRS Timelines