ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline Project

492 Words2 Pages

The Dakota Access pipeline project is starting from Stanley, North Dakota to Illinois. This project announced in 2014 and the plan is to move oil across four states. The project was finished on January 7, 2017. Some people think that it is very helpful and healthy but others think that shouldn’t. The people who against the project to sue this project and it has been delayed. Both sides of this project have different justifiable reasons. In this essay, I will explain this situation is ethical or unethical and why. People who want this project think that this pipeline is the best way to move the oil. They think it is very safe, and an environment-friendly way to carry oil to other states. They think if they don’t move this oil it will be bad for people because they think this oil can infiltrate to water and that will affect …show more content…

And also, they need to judgment every process about projects and they need to be honest about any results of projects. In this situation, the engineers should make the necessary research and decide what the consequences are in these situations. After that, they need to explain advantages and disadvantages for this project to everyone. People need to think this advantages and disadvantages after that, they can decide which one is good or bad. When governments decide on matters that interest people, they need to listen to everyone’s ideas about this situation. If they make whatever they want, some people are unhappy because of that. I think if you want to do this, everyone should accept it because this decision will affect people life. engineers have a good skill about finding good different solutions any situation. In this problem, engineers can make a good project for everyone. for example, some people think that this project affect scared spaces and maybe they can find a solution for this problem. After that, people can be

Show More
Related
1248 Words | 5 Pages

The two parties in debate over the pipeline’s border crossing are the U.S. government and TransCanada. TransCanada is one of the continent’s largest providers of gas storage and related services. The company shares they are a leader in the responsible

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

Controversy Surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline To build or not to build, this choice will impact the relationship between the US and Canada and determine the level of dependence the US will have on countries that are not so friendly. “TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day” (Parfomak, Pirog, Luther and Vann 4). The construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline would strengthen the United States economy, provide energy security and have minimal environmental impact. “The Keystone XL project would create $1.1 trillion in private capital investment at no

Read More
120 Words | 1 Pages

In my opinion I am against the pipeline. The negative effects out way the positives of the pipeline. To begin with, there isn't a real need for the pipeline, so why spend billions of dollars on a pipeline that isn't needed. The cost of the pipeline is extremely high whereas the pipeline might not actually be worth that much to the residents here. There would be taxes and fees that the residents and the business owners would have to pay to pay for the pipeline that could be avoided.

Read More
2524 Words | 11 Pages

Two main political issues today are the economy and the environment, a recent topic that involves these issues is the decision or lack thereof to go through with the Keystone pipeline XL. The pipeline stretches from Alberta, Canada to the Gulf of Mexico, via Texas and can provide immediate jobs and oil economic stimulation as well as economic stimulation for future generations. The problem is that while this project can mean a brighter future economically, it can also mean a darker future environmentally. Despite the possible environmental risks, the keystone pipeline XL project needs to be approved as it can provide energy security and a major economical stimulation for this generation and the next.

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

“The oil spills are most likely and could result from corrosion, defects in materials or construction, pressure, ground movements and flooding.” That would affect low-income family lives around the pipeline and they will have higher chances of environmental hazards. Wilder acknowledges that U.S. needs to find other ways to get clean and sustainable sources of energy because Keystone XL pipeline is not a solution. After reading Wilder’s essay, I consider the health and communities’ safety and the rising threats of climate change the first priority rather than building the XL

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

The Keystone pipeline should not be built because it endangers the environment and has the ability to create catastrophic damages through pollution and habitat desecration. Though many see benefits to the addition of a national pipeline, the effects and dangers must outweigh any slight economic gain. A small gain in government currency should never endanger the future loss of an environment, which is something than can cannot be

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

The Dakota Access Pipeline has been a very controversial subject, it makes you truly think what would be best for most people in the situation. Like every story, there are two sides, and what one finds right or wrong is up to them. Here is exactly what the Dakota Access Pipeline is, and the pros, and cons. The Dakota Pipeline is a giant project that will run an oil pipe from North Dakota to Patoka, Illinois that's around 1,000 miles of 30-inch pipes.

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

The sententious construction of the pipeline will help…”create thousands of jobs”(DAPL:top pros and cons). By implying more jobs, it allows many people to have the opportunity to have a workplace in which they can earn the money to pay off and bills presented. Even if the pipeline can produce more jobs, but the pipeline would not cause any major incidents. Once the Dakota Access Pipeline is bonded into place, workers wondered if there, shall be a decrease in ant incidents than other major pipeline that recently resulted in spillages. The DAPL both pros and cons, states that there is a new way of “oil freight ages…to major refining markets in a more productive way towards the environment.”

Read More
213 Words | 1 Pages

The Dakota Access Pipeline is a underground oil pipeline. Part of the pipeline is on Native American territory. To get access to the pipeline, burial grounds of the Natives Americans would have to be annihilated, going against the tradition of Native American culture. In the article,”

Read More
1808 Words | 8 Pages

Within recent months, the proposed Dakota Access Pipeline has gained enough national attention to divide the country. Many Americans believe it would be a good investment that could bring a galore of oil, money, and jobs for the country, boosting the economy and having lasting positive effects on Americans. However, others argue that the pipeline would bring harm to the Native American culture and the environment. Nevertheless, the surrounding area of the 1,170 mile pipeline would be affected by this pipeline. The Dakota Access Pipeline puts habitats, animals, and hundreds of thousands of lives and the culture of these lives at risk of being tarnished.

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

With that being said, some are for the pipeline while others are fighting and protesting against it. Some people love the idea of the pipeline. One reason being it would make us less dependent of foreign oil. Another advantage is it would allow railways to carry more food and supplies since they wouldn’t have to carry oil anymore. Not to mention the 8,000 to 12,000 jobs the construction of the project will create.

Read More
2089 Words | 9 Pages

The environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

“Benefits of Governmental Compromise Regarding the Dakota Access Pipeline” Nations all have unique governments and differences necessary for demonstrating successful leadership. Every country needs different assistance from their leadership, such as Rio requiring infrastructure or Somalia lacking political power. Some governments concern themselves with their politicians’ well-being more so than the people they lead, which creates a relevant problem in America. The United States Government can easily forget about Native American Reservations, or even ignore the people living on them. Recently, the United States Army Corps of Engineers has worked on the Dakota Access Pipeline project, which would cross over Native American ancestral lands,

Read More
241 Words | 1 Pages

The controversy behind these pipelines can be seen when looked at the political,

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

Since its construction in 1977, the Trans Alaska Pipeline has transported almost 17 billion barrels of oil, and currently transports about 527,323 barrels a day. It celebrated its 40th Anniversary last year, and, even after all this time, is still facing controversy. The pipeline is highly debated as economically inclined citizens of Alaska are clashing with more environmental types. The Trans Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act, signed by President Nixon in 1973, protected the pipeline by banning all legal challenges against the construction of the pipeline. However, this law did not stop the critics of the pipeline from speaking out.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline Project

Related Topics

Open Document