ipl-logo

Dakota Access Pipeline Benefits

812 Words4 Pages

“Benefits of Governmental Compromise Regarding the Dakota Access Pipeline” Nations all have unique governments and differences necessary for demonstrating successful leadership. Every country needs different assistance from their leadership, such as Rio requiring infrastructure or Somalia lacking political power. Some governments concern themselves with their politicians’ well-being more so than the people they lead, which creates a relevant problem in America. The United States Government can easily forget about Native American Reservations, or even ignore the people living on them. Recently, the United States Army Corps of Engineers has worked on the Dakota Access Pipeline project, which would cross over Native American ancestral lands, …show more content…

These issues can still improve through cooperation and understanding, however, and reaching a satisfactory decision about the Dakota Access Pipeline provides a perfect gateway to uplifting improvement of the reservations’ lifestyle. If the government agrees to give a little, a great opportunity arises for them to get a little as well. In the last decades, lack of funding has led to blatantly subpar education for the majority of Native American students, even when the government made an attempt to intervene due to an understandable inherent distrust of Government interference. Through a monumental compromise via the Dakota Access Pipeline, the government could prove its decency, transparency, and trustworthiness, which would advance the relationship of Native Americans and the United States Government brilliantly. The newfound trust could easily apply to areas such as financial welfare, educational support, and government-run health clinics. These government services would gain trust and improve the quality of life on reservations, one honest and caring program at …show more content…

If the government agrees to permit self-rule on reservations, Native Americans and observing American citizens would hold the institution in a higher regard. Native Americans would trust the government more, as well as live a higher quality life on the currently impoverished reservations. Perhaps an admirable compromise and unique leadership would impress other countries, too. The United States Government has the opportunity shine as an example of positive conflict resolution to other nations, and the nation as a whole would benefit from a bit of positive

Show More
Related
418 Words | 2 Pages

The Dakota Access Pipeline should not be built under the Missouri river because if the pipeline is built more water will become contaminated. In a CNN article about the pipeline, it states “The Dakota Access pipeline would fuel climate change, cause untold damage to the environment, and significantly disturb sacred lands and the way of life for Native Americans in the upper Midwest,”(CNN). The Dakota Access Pipeline is one of the most controversial pipelines ever made and said that this pipeline can hurt multiple things at once. There is a bunch of pros and cons to this pipeline but to ignore all those pros and let's talk about the cons, CNN states that others said there might be a possible breach of the pipeline in the future. The pipeline

Read More
1036 Words | 5 Pages

The Sioux Indians had lived on the Dakota Territory for longer than the white men had been in North America, and they would rather die than allow the United States to take their land. The U.S. government used this as an excuse to murder the Indians, making it easier for them to take the lands they wanted. However, before the United States resorted to violence, they attempted to negotiate with the Sioux for their land. These negotiations would often end in threats from the U.S. due to the Sioux’s lack of cooperation. This eventually led to battles between the two parties, where the Sioux would most likely lose and forfeit

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

The Dakota Access Pipeline has been a very controversial subject, it makes you truly think what would be best for most people in the situation. Like every story, there are two sides, and what one finds right or wrong is up to them. Here is exactly what the Dakota Access Pipeline is, and the pros, and cons. The Dakota Pipeline is a giant project that will run an oil pipe from North Dakota to Patoka, Illinois that's around 1,000 miles of 30-inch pipes.

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson, John Marshall, and The Trail of Tears There have been many dark times in our History as Americans. Among them is the Trail of Tears,brought upon by Andrew Jackson, which exiled the Indians from the American south and resulted in the death of thousands on the way to Oklahoma. Before this trying time there was speculation within the supreme court whether to treat the Native tribes as a sovereign foreign nation or as a dependent entity within the United States. I will discuss how these decisions came to be, the reactions to said decisions, and the aftermath of these rulings which inevitably leads to the Trail of Tears.

Read More
1453 Words | 6 Pages

That however, does not justify the unethical practices that were used to gain access to build the Dakota Access Pipeline. There are two sides to the argument, those who support the construction of the pipeline, and those who do not. Those who are in support of the pipeline say that it would better the American People and better the economy. Another benefit of the pipeline being

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Some believe that oil pipelines, such as the Keystone XL and the Bakken Pipeline will be the first step to isolating ourselves from depending on outside threats for resources. Others believe that oil pipelines have the ability to contaminate the world, not only through water and climate, but also through the economy. The public needs to be informed about what really goes on behind the scenes, what the fate is of towns that have oil pipelines running through them, and why protesters are so headstrong in their beliefs. North Dakota is a hotspot for oil related activity, and has housed the controversies of the Keystone XL Pipeline and the Bakken Pipeline.

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

The relationship between the United States and the Native American tribes has never been a supportive one, challenging at best. In the past 200 years the relationship between the two has put pressure on Congress’ claim of a world power over tribes and tribal nation’s natural sovereignty, one that is even older than that of the United States of America. This tension, which comes from a sense of where the status of the Tribe fits into the United States Constitution, is creating a slippery slope for the Native American people. But in the book, the biggest question Pommersheim raises in the introduction is: can the modern Indian people escape their federally forced dependence, to become truly self-defining?

Read More
1557 Words | 7 Pages

In response to this discussion, Senators Kyl and McCain wrote the article, “An Endless Tribal Water Fight,” in hopes of defending the intentions of their bill. On the other hand, Navajo representative, Ed Bencenti wrote the article, “Senate Bill 2109 Seeks to Extinguish Navajo and Hopi Water Rights,” in which he exposes the real intentions of the Senate Bill. Both Kyl and McCain do a good job of presenting their claims to support their interests. However, the intentions of the Senate Bill are not ethical and efficient; instead of attempting to alleviate the issue of the scarcity of water, it is contributing to this problem by taking away the water that belonged to the tribes’ and giving it to coal

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

Trading the resource called oil became a popular demand in most countries especially The United States of America. Canada started to become richer with money from this a resource. The U.S. wanted a more efficient way to get their oil from Canada, so the U.S. and Canada created a Keystone pipeline to deliver this oil from one country to the next. Over the years a new proposition came along to build another pipeline called the Keystone pipeline XL for an even more efficient way to deliver oil. With this new idea, a giant controversy was born.

Read More
1086 Words | 5 Pages

Secondary Source Analysis In order to create his ideal Native American standing within the American Government, which includes the non-indigenous portion of the world acknowledging and understanding Native American issues with the United States and Internationally, Walter R. Echo-Hawk, in his A Context for Understanding Native American Issues, delves into the United State’s past Indian affairs as well as his goals for achieving this ideal. It is important to consider the author’s attitude towards the topic, his desired audience and the devices he used when analyzing the strength of his arguments. Echo-Hawk brings up the point, during the beginning of chapter two, that the general public is unaware of much of the happenings between the United

Read More
1193 Words | 5 Pages

As things continued to get worst, the government and Natives tried to help stabilize the Native American society and stop the attacks on their Native culture. So in 1934, as a part of President’s Roosevelt’s New Deal, the united states signed the Indian Reorganization Act. The act gave tribes the option of establishing democratic forms of government. By following the modeled government described in the Act, tribes would be eligible for federal funds to purchase land, start business ventures, and receive various social services. But this all came at a hidden price that was unseen as the act was created.

Read More
2027 Words | 9 Pages

The Ups and Downs of the Cherokee Tribe Did you know that the Cherokee Nation is one of only three federally recognized tribes that has the sovereign right to control their nation? That means that they have the right to control what goes on within their nation, despite the states government. Although the tribe may be doing well today, that hasn’t always been the case. The Cherokee Tribe had to overcome many obstacles and heartaches. Shortly after the first Cherokee entered the state in the vicinity of Travelers Rest in 1450, the Cherokees were put through many challenging times.

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

For the next seventy years, the mass of the Choctaws that had remained in Mississippi were incapable to experience the settlement of land or citizenship in Mississippi because they were expelled and disenfranchised By the 1960s, the Choctaw tribe of Mississippi found themselves in extreme poverty, lack of education, poor housing and high unemployment. Mississippi at the time was to be considered one of the poorest states. The rise of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians came after World War II. Civil rights and more legislation took place; this helped the Choctaw Indians to start to rise.

Read More
1211 Words | 5 Pages

These sacred places that the Dakota held so dear, were taken from them through legalized theft and deceit. For these reasons, the Dakota should receive a large portion of southern Minnesota untouched by the government, as it is largely uninhabited and farm land. In addition,

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.

Read More

More about Dakota Access Pipeline Benefits

Open Document