Controversy Surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline To build or not to build, this choice will impact the relationship between the US and Canada and determine the level of dependence the US will have on countries that are not so friendly. “TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day” (Parfomak, Pirog, Luther and Vann 4). The construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline would strengthen the United States economy, provide energy security and have minimal environmental impact. “The Keystone XL project would create $1.1 trillion in private capital investment at no
Gas Prices Should be Lowered Gas prices can be expensive most of the time and almost everywhere you go. It’s hard to find a reasonable gas price. Maybe you should blame the global demand for gas prices being so high.
What is DACA? DACA is a program created by Barak Obama to aid undocumented immigrants, specifically children who were brought in by their parents illegally. How does DACA help immigrants? They are helped by being allowed to work, have a driver license, and potentially own a home. How are these opportunities granted?
Disregarding some environmental factors related to the Keystone XL pipeline, I believe that it will do great justice to both Canada and the United States of America. This pipeline will create jobs, increase the economy, and strengthen American and Canadian energy security. Currently Canadian unemployment rate has increased vastly from March 2014 to 7.1% and the American rate has increased to 5.5%. By initiating this pipeline project, more than 42,000 direct and indirect jobs will be created and it will also add an additional 1.8 million employment in the US over the next 22 years. As the number of jobs increase, the economy will benefit from this highly because of taxes.
The pipeline is an issue of culture clash; How can a culture such as that held by the Standing Rock Sioux tribe and the Army Corps of engineers be compatible? The Standing Rock Sioux tribe has held certain locations with a very high level of respect in their culture for many years. They have considered this land to have special meaning, even though the United States government has legal ownership that doesn’t mean that the tribe threw out the cultural meaning they had associated with the land just because they did not have legal ownership of the land. The notion of American property law is not considered as relevant to their beliefs regarding the land. This is not to say that the tribe is against American law, it is more to say that perhaps
The Keystone pipeline should not be built because it endangers the environment and has the ability to create catastrophic damages through pollution and habitat desecration. Though many see benefits to the addition of a national pipeline, the effects and dangers must outweigh any slight economic gain. A small gain in government currency should never endanger the future loss of an environment, which is something than can cannot be
The Pipe Dreams Documentary shows the vast amount of struggle and determination it takes for farmers to win their own land back. It shares a controversial issue on the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. “It’s just like a diamond in the world, the Ogallala Aquifer isn’t just Nebraska, it isn’t just the United States, it’s a clean and big lake” states Cornelius Murphy a rancher in Stuart, Nebraska. TransCanada has been requesting the US government for the approval of a 7 billion dollar pipeline known as the Keystone XL. This pipeline would be used to ship heavy crude oil from Hardisty, Alberta to around the Gulf Coast of Mexico.
Most would say climate change is one of the most critical issues facing the world. Our current president, Barack Obama, has passed some of the best environmental regulations of any president. His decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline secured his reputation as an environmentalist. The Keystone XL pipeline extension enables oil companies to expand development of Canada’s tar sands, increasing greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change. But it will be Obama’s successor, the next president, that determines whether we continue to move forward with environmentally friendly policies.
The Keystone Pipeline is a controversial issue. Some believe that the ‘cons’ outweigh the ‘pros’ and others believe the opposite. What good can come from the pipeline? If the pipeline is not approved then we will be forced to transport petroleum by trains and ships. This is said not to be efficient because trains are in risk of getting into an accident and ships will pollute our waters and can possibly spill oil (Goldberg,2015).
The Keystone XL Pipeline has been a controversial topic for the past seven years, first proposed in 2008 it still garners widespread debate. The KXL Pipeline is the fourth phase of a proposed crude oil pipeline that will run south from the Alberta oil sands to the refineries in the U.S. With the economic and environmental implications of such a large project so close to home its undertaking would also impact all the local communities as well as economies all over the world. For that reason how should the US government decide the pipeline’s future, taking into account the economics of the investment? To make an economic decision about this venture one must examine the effects of the pipeline from the oil and gas industry’s point of view, from
The environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy
After months of clashes from protestors and the police, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued an eviction notice to the Dakota access protest camps. News articles such as Dakota pipeline protest camp: Ten arrested, dozens more believed to remain after evacuation deadline, by Mark Berman from the Washington Post and Arrest made in North Dakota, as group of pipeline protesters remain at camp, by William Lajeunesse from Fox News, describe the event that happened on the day of the eviction that resulted with their readers concluding with different implications of the event. Lajeunesse and Berman defined key ideas that shaped the view of their readers. They both choose to give and omit specific information that give their readers one side of the eviction.
Attorney General, I am writing on the behalf of the Sioux Nation's stand against the pipeline that threatens their land, water, health, and future. Although their stand is a way to advocate for their rights laid out int the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Man (1948) and should be supported, the primary reason I write are as follows: 1)Pipeline action violate the 1868 treaty that the U.S. has made with the Sioux Nation 2) Militarized tactics (rubber bullets, etc.) used against the nation's people for standing for looking after their health and the ecology of the land is attrocious. 3) There is a comonent of the above said actions that seem to violate the Sioux peoples' Freedom of Religion. I am extremely concerned
DACA immigrants have contributed to society by paying taxes which support the American economy. DACA immigrants have work permits that allow them to have a social security number. With this social, they work legally and, like Americans, pay taxes. In reality “1.3 million young undocumented immigrants [...] eligible for DACA contribute an estimated $2 billion a year,” (State & Local Tax Contributions). Contrary to many American beliefs, these undocumented immigrants do not just live in the country; they live in the country and help the economy.
Donald Trump approved the Keystone XL pipeline in March of 2017, and the project will create construction and operating jobs for Canadians, and for Americans. The pipeline will run from Alberta through Saskatchewan then through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and finally Texas. By encouraging
