Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

467 Words2 Pages

I think that occasionally we can have a discussion of a more serious nature. My thoughts on the death penalty which unfortunately mostly no longer exists in many states is that what you do to another person should be done right back to you and the end of that. Happy dancing with the devil but who am I to say there may be other who are of another opinion.

Let’s take a look at how the death penalty came about and how it also ended. Many years ago a man named Giuseppe Zangara shot the Mayor of Chicago Anton Cermak. This happened in Miami, Florida on February 15, 1933. The shots that Zangara fired missed President-elect Franklin Roosevelt, who was with Cermak at that time. As a result Cermak died of his wounds on March 6.

Zangara was indicted and arraigned for murder. Once he pled guilty he was placed on the electric chair two weeks later on March 20. Today such a quick turnabout is unknown. Changes to the death penalty started in the 1950s when Caryl Chessman, a convicted robber, kidnapper and rapist spent practically 12 years on death row in California before he went to the gas chamber in 1960 for kidnapping. During this time Chessman made many appeals, had three books published and drew attention to himself from Hollywood and the international community, who then lobbied publicly on his behalf. He became one of the last Americans to be executed for a crime other than murder. …show more content…

Jerry Joe Bird, who murdered a man also became quite ill during this time. He was finally given the lethal injection in Texas in 1991 having spent 17 years on death row. Then two inmates sitting on death row for 20 years made an appeal to the Supreme Court saying that this long wait was itself a cruel and unusual punishment. The court did not hear the appeal saying that the prisoners most likely themselves had caused this