ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Harrison Act Of 1914

378 Words2 Pages

Four major drug control laws enacted by federal government since 1900 are listed as follows: 1906 Pure food and Drug Act – Consequently,” the new law did not possibly harmful drugs in patented medicines from being sold” (Levinthal,2012). Nevertheless, it only required that manufacturers classify specific drugs that might be delimited in these untested medicines. The Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914: Nevertheless, “at first everyone was required to- importing, manufacturing, selling or dispensing cocaine or opiate drugs to register with the treasury department” (Levinthal,2012). However, they must pay a special tax and keep records. Theoretically, the Harrison Act did not make opiates and cocaine illegal. However, physicians could prescribe these …show more content…

Notwithstanding, physicians stop dispensing prescription drugs not protected under the Harrison Act, in order to circumvent prosecution. Consequently, in a de facto way opiates and cocaine were made illegal. Conversely, practically overnight a new class of criminal was created. The Boggs Act of 1951: Combined increase penalties of previously enacted marijuana and narcotics laws. Nevertheless, the minimum sentence was two years for 1st time offenders, and up to ten years for repeat offenders. Conversely, “the sale of heroin to individuals under the age of 18 was now a capital offense, punishable by life imprisonment” (Levinthal,2012). The Controlled Substance Act of 1970: Consequently, this act can consolidate a large number of drug laws. Nevertheless, establish a classification of drugs, solidified the power of the Federal Government to regulate drug taking behavior. Therefore, “shifted the administration of drug enforcement from the Treasury Department” (Levinthal,2012). “The driving force behind the Boggs Act was a mistaken belief that drug addiction was a contagious and perhaps incurable disease and that addicts should be quarantined and forced to undergo treatment, however, just five years after the Boggs Act, Congress passed the Narcotics Control Act of

Show More
Related
1099 Words | 5 Pages

In response, Congress passed the Harrison Act, which was designed to regulate drug abuse through government taxation and became the basis for narcotics regulation in the United States. Furthermore, the act required anyone importing, manufacturing, selling, and dispensing cocaine, and opiate drugs to register with the Treasury Department, pay a special tax and keep records of all of their transactions. Officially, the Harrison Act did not make opiates and cocaine illegal, physicians could prescribe these drugs in the course of their professional practice only, which left a good deal of interpretation, and many physicians found themselves to be in violation of the law. Eventually, physicians stopped prescribing the drugs that were covered under the Harrison Act, which resulted in a new kind of criminal, driving individuals to seek drugs through a black market. Subsequently, the Harrison Act failed to reduce the drug-taking behavior and created a new market for organized

Read More
1313 Words | 6 Pages

The Pendleton Act was steered through Congress by Senator George H. Pendleton of Ohio passed by Congress on January 16th, 1883 and it established the civil service to create a fair job market ("Pendleton Act," n.d.). Congress passed the Pendleton Act following the assassination of President James A. Garfield by a disgruntled job seeker ("Pendleton Act," n.d.). Before the act, it was standard practice for newly elected presidents to reward political friends and supporters with Government positions and this was common practice by the time Andrew Jackson was elected President in 1828. The act attempted to minimize the influence of politics on civil service employees by making it illegal to discipline an employee for political reasons. Also, the

Read More
96 Words | 1 Pages

Due to the unprecedented expansion of the war on drugs by the Reagan administration started a long period of skyrocketing rates of incarceration. The huge number of offenders incarcerated for nonviolent drug offenders increased from 50,000 to 1980 to over 400,000 by the year 1997. In 1981, Nancy Reagan began a highly publicized antidrug campaign called “Just Say No”, as public concerns arose due to the portrayals by the media about people addicted to a smoke-able form of cocaine dubbed as “crack”. This campaign set the stage for zero tolerance policies implemented in the late 1980’s.

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

What we interpret from the text is that the law has little to do with the dangers associated with illicit (opium) drug usage? Additionally, people use other drugs, alcohol and tobacco (that are a hazard to health too), both privately and publicly are legal. In fact, creating 1908 anti-drug law is a fight between cultures- Chinese and white traders, it is all about economic crises, racism, resolving labor conflicts, satisfying federal government and, pleasing white traders. Most important of all, health issues does not play the significant role in the creation of the 1908 anti-drug law as it does in the present time. The nature of the statute law starts with the ferocity that took place on September 7, 1907.

Read More
418 Words | 2 Pages

The use of drugs has become a major problem in our society, leading to serious health and social issues. The Rockefeller Drug Act of 1914 was a landmark piece of legislation that sought to curb the sale and use of narcotics in the United States. It was proposed by John D. Rockefeller Jr., who had become increasingly concerned about the effects of drug addiction on society. The act made it illegal for anyone to possess, sell, or transport narcotics without a prescription from a licensed physician. It also imposed stiff penalties for violations of the law and allowed for federal prosecution of those found guilty.

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

If there was an open market for drugs and Americans’ were educated on the effects drugs can have on their bodies, the monopoly for drugs would rapidly decrease. Drugs are outlawed in America yet prohibition has never been successful in America. Anytime the government has tried to stop the distribution of a substance people have always jumped at the chance to make

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

The war impacted the lives of students that became involved with drugs resulting in an educational trap where the drug user had no ability to expand their education. 80% of students with drug violations where either suspended or expelled preventing them from an opportunity to turn around their lives. The effect on education escalated Drug Free Student Loans Act of 1998 that punished drug law offenders by temporarily or permanently denying federal student financial aid, and the act was an extension to a 1994 law that that denied aid to prisoners. This restriction on higher education forced former drug users from moving upward in the social ladder. The War on Drugs continued to hurt the youth outside of their

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

William Jefferson “Bill” Clinton was the 42nd president of the United States of America from the year of 1993 to 2001. He was initially named William Jefferson Blythe on the day of his birth on 19 August, 1946 in Hope, Arkansas, but changed surnames after his mother remarried four years later. He studied law in Yale Law School where he met his wife, Hilary Clinton. Prior to his election as president, Clinton was the State’s Attorney General from 1977 to 1979, and was the Governor of Arkansas from 1979 to 1981 and 1983 to 1991.

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

The combination of drugs and unemployment increased crime, as drugs and alcohol disproportionately affected the black population. Above all the government's approach to addressing the harmful effects of drugs on society has created an oppressive atmosphere for poor blacks and other minority groups. The war on drugs targeted drug users and drug contributors similarly, and the group that was primarily affected was the African American community. However, they treated crack and cocaine differently, as it turns out; there is no significant chemical difference between them. The only distinction was in federal sentencing laws for possessing each form of the same drug, which had more to do with incorrect information and political pressure than public safety and health.

Read More
127 Words | 1 Pages

The 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act prevented the manufacture, sale, or transportation of misbranded or poisonous foods, drugs, medicines and liquors, and regulated the trafficking of such items. This act was ruled by the Senate and House of Representatives in Congress, and is regulated today by the U.S. Foods and Drugs Administration today. This act was very successful in improving public health, for according to the Social Security bureau of the United States, now manufactured new drugs have to be inspected and certified by appropriate personnel. This allowed for the revision of many drugs and foods, and got rid of many drugs that used strange and unusual ingredients. This included the banning of cocaine cough drops and soothing syrups that contained

Read More
1820 Words | 8 Pages

Restrictions and the Prohibition became a thing and many people in the late 19th and early 20th century were questioning the objections to non-medical usage and it soon became a hot debate. Drugs were used for everyday use within industrial workers and laborers. Drugs today are either known as Licit or Illicit ones because we know which ones are actually okay to use in everyday life and then the ones that hurt people. Caffeine is used today worldwide, and it is legal, but only some of the drugs are this way. We still have the illicit drugs that will always be that way such as cocaine and meth.

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

The use of narcotics like cocaine, claimed many lives and earned widespread coverage by media and news. Following this Nancy Reagan began the “War on Drugs”, a campaign to combat pre-existing drug usage and prevent future

Read More
2282 Words | 10 Pages

Consent, Coercion and Autonomy in the Treatment of Substance Abuse and Addiction Brianna J. Westover Delaware Technical and Community College Historical Implications Addict. The word itself carries with it an enormous stigma. Just over 100 years ago in 1914, the Harrison Act banned the use of opiates and cocaine. Four years later, alcohol prohibition followed, and in 1934, the Marijuana Stamp Act was enacted, prohibiting that substance as well. (American Civil Liberties Union, 2015)

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

For example, agencies have been established with the sole intent to manage drug use and distribution and technology has been exclusively developed to detect the presence of drugs. Yet, evidence has indicated that such exhaustive efforts have been relatively unsuccessful. First, it has been assumed that drugs have perpetuated violence in society and based on this rationale, it was believed that by the suppressing the pervasiveness of drugs that incidents of violence would simultaneously diminish. However, reality has failed to align with the expectations that had initially been anticipated. Research findings have suggested that the decriminalization of drugs would result in a less adversarial drug market in which conflicts have tended to arise among dealers as well as between dealers and buyers (Common Sense for Drug Policy, 2007, p. 21).

Read More
1461 Words | 6 Pages

Marijuana, morphine, heroin, and cocaine continued to be used when the Prohibition was over in 1933. In 1937, 46 states decided to ban the use of marijuana for the reason that it was dangerous and a potential drug for addiction. Fast forward 60 years, states

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Harrison Act Of 1914

Related Topics

Open Document