ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Judicial Branch

873 Words4 Pages

“Good Morning dear classmates and teacher, I will be delivering a speech explaining why the US Judicial Branch is Good but Far from Perfect…” Thanks to the principle of Separation of Powers, the U.S. government is divided into three branches, each responsible for accomplishing specific tasks. “The judicial branch is in charge of deciding the meaning of laws, how to apply them to real situations, and whether a law breaks the rules of the Constitution or not. It is said that The Constitution of the United States is the highest law of our Nation. The U.S. Supreme Court, the highest court in the United States, is part of the Judicial Branch. The Supreme Court is made up of 9 judges called justices who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The justices hear cases that have made their way up through the …show more content…

Most Americans believe and think that the system is fair which is false. The US judicial system still has not attained the standards of perfectness that are necessary for a judicial system that is meant to serve the public. According to Rasmussen Reports national survey, 42% of the US voters think that the justice system is fair to all Americans even those who have migrated into the country for various reasons. However, 80% of black and Hispanic Americans feel that the judiciary system is unfair and unjust (Burns, page 1). The highest percent hence feels that there is a lot of injustice going on in the US judicial system which is true. The judicial branch in United States lacks fairness and justice. The immigrants are denied justice and fair trial wherever they are under the court trials. These immigrants, in most cases, they are denied the right to appeal for some cases. This is a clear indication of injustice and absence of fairness in the judicial proceedings. On the other hand, white people and the minority races think otherwise since they lack the knowledge on how the system

Show More
Related

Summary Of Just Mercy By Bryan Stevenson

976 Words | 4 Pages

The United States is no ray of sunshine, specifically for dark-skinned individuals. Over the years, race and gender have played an essential role in the United States, limiting access to basic needs to those who do not fit their white and patriarchal expectations. As everyone grows more knowledgeable about what in reality is happening in our society, our capital becomes angrier and more defensive, making it impossible, especially for women and dark-skinned U.S. citizens, to live in a place of peace and freedom. The book "Just Mercy" by Bryan Stevenson is one of those books that opened my perspective on the court system in the U.S. Just Mercy is the story of a black lawyer and his journey to become one of the most respected individuals who fought for a unique court system for the population viewed as a minority among white supremacists.

Read More

Explain The Strengths Of The Judicial Branch

1067 Words | 5 Pages

Ultimately, the judicial branch has to go back to what the founding fathers intended for the court’s purpose and to use the power accordingly. To maintain the strength of the branch, the courts must think about what is constitutionally right. Their decisions should reflect the amendments as well. “Judicial power plays an important role in the rule of law, even while it comes frequently into tension with norms of democratic rule” (Friedman & Delaney, 2011, p. 57, para. 1). This is the only way that citizens will feel like their rights are truly protected.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Supreme Court Justices

219 Words | 1 Pages

What is actually happening is allowing Supreme Court justices to serve for life. An article stated that “by making new appointments less frequent, longer tenure has diminished the abilities of presidents and senators to provide the only form of democratic accountability that is consistent with judicial independence,” (Jr., Stuart Taylor. ). William Douglas, who has set record for Supreme Court tenure (almost 37 years) who has cast the deciding vote, along with Hugo Black who retired at the age of 85 and Thurgood Marshall who retired at the age of 83. “ I’m getting old and falling apart,” Marshall said on his last day (Jr., Stuart Taylor. ). That’s why it is better to bring fresh perspectives, and especially those people who understand the

Read More

Darryl Hunts Case Study

1324 Words | 6 Pages

While the judicial system strives for unbiased justice, the jurors are often influenced by incorrect or racist sentiments. Some still believe in a culture where descendants of European cultures are supreme to other races and when something bad occurs involving one of their own against a person of a different color, then it is immediately and definitely, regardless of the numerous amounts of evidence, his fault. Anthropologist view this as a problem with the beliefs in the culture. Mainstream culture has attempted to condition all people to believe that white americans are the same and equal to black americans. People are also told with documents and events that the discrimination can no longer exist, but it is still of the culture of some to believe the opposite.

Read More

The Interpretation Of Reading Law By Antonin Scalia

138 Words | 1 Pages

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest and most important judicial body in the country. The justices are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The Supreme Court has a special role in the government system, since the Constitution gives it the power to check the actions of Congress and the President if necessary. There are nine seats in the Supreme Court, one is the Chief Justice and the other eight are Associate Justices, but since Antonin Scalia’s death there has been only eight seats. The Q&A movie interviews the U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia before he passed away in February 2016.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Supreme Court

329 Words | 2 Pages

Folks – we need to be sturdy enough to call for referendum to amendment that thoughtless law enshrined in the constitution giving the Supreme Court the ardent dead-on without any form of limitation to summons, prosecute, and indict the citizenry for exercising their first amendment right. What the Supreme Court is doing is scapegoating citizenry who spontaneously express their view of the Supreme Court rulings they felt is antithetical to their fundamental right. Colleague this is not democracy is rather a tyranny at best. The point worth making exceedingly flawless that Supreme Court is not an infallible or foolproof institution.

Read More

Explain The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Judicial Branch

2567 Words | 11 Pages

Although the braches were established in 1787, there has been a lot of changes (amendments) that were necessary throughout the past few centuries. The branch to be discussed will be the Judicial Branch in regards to a strength and a weakness within the branch. One major strength of the Judiciary branch of our government is the process in which the Justice are appointed. Unlike the presidency where the Electoral College decide who the next president will be, there are certain procedures emplaced in order to determine who the Justices will be. The determination of how many Justices are allowed has been laid out for us.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Federal Justice System

105 Words | 1 Pages

I believe that the federal justice system is just and unbiased. The federal justice system has guidelines and rules to keep them from using power improperly and targeting groups of people based on their race. This is talked about in article “Is the Criminal Justice System Racist”. There are statistics given pertaining to the prison sentences given to African Americans, prosecution during a felony trial, and crime/prison rates.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Supreme Court Justices

279 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that a person can predict a decision that the Supreme Court Justices make because of their views are liberal or conservative. Because of their views on either side, they deal with cases by finding loopholes to interpret the laws to make it suitable for the case that works on their side (Pollack, 2017). The final legislation and authority in this country are The United States Supreme Court, despite the objective decision making they decide constitutional cases which are sometimes far from a neutral outcome. The federal judges and the Supreme Court Justices and appointed by the president because it is a political contest between the liberals and the conservatives so that when there is a substantial issue like abortion, there is only

Read More

Mississippi Trail Today Analysis

1449 Words | 6 Pages

Like in the Mississippi trial, minorities of today are often treated unfairly in trial. According to the NAACP, in their article, Criminal Justice Facts Sheet, “About 14 million Whites and 2.6 million African-Americans report using an illicit drug. 5 times as many Whites are using drugs as Africa-Americans, yet African-Americans are sent to prison for drug offenses at 10 times the rate of Whites”. This would mean that for the same drug offences, African-Americans are being put in jail at 10 time the rate of whites. The fact that African-Americans are being incarcerated at 10 times the rate of whites for the same offences, proves that there is racial injustice in the US judicial system.

Read More

Us Constitution Preamble Essay

447 Words | 2 Pages

The people who serve are called associate justices. There are 8 of them ,and one leader a total of 9! The leader is called the chief justices are approved by the president and the senate they serve for life .They can only lose their job by impeachment .There are 12 court of appeals , There are 2 important legal concepts. Amendments

Read More

Judicial Review Pros And Cons

741 Words | 3 Pages

Robert Isenhour Federal Government 110 10/10/17 Judicial Review Judicial Review had been obsolete until 1803 when the need for it arose in the case of Marbury vs. Madison, where it was then found to become a new component to the Judicial Branch. I am here to discuss why judicial review is and shall remain a doctrine commonly used in constitutional law. Judicial Review is the power for courts to review other government branches to determine the validity of its actions whether it be constitutional or unconstitutional. These ‘acts’ can be described as legislation passed by congress, presidential orders and actions, or all state and local governmental actions.

Read More

Why The Judicial Branch Is The Most Powerful

478 Words | 2 Pages

Hana Kim Professor Yvonne Wollenberg Law and Politics 106 7 October 2015 Title In the United States government, there are three branches called the legislative, executive, and judicial branch. Out of these three, the judicial branch is the most powerful. The judicial branch is made up of the Supreme Court, the court with the most power in the country, and other federal courts that are lower in the system; the purpose of this branch is to look over laws and make sure they are constitutional and reasonable.

Read More

Supreme Court Justice Research Paper

517 Words | 3 Pages

1. The supreme court is the highest federal court in the United States. It consists of nine supreme court justices. Federal judges are nominated by the president and approved by the senate. Once appointed the justices will serve on the supreme court for the rest of their lives, unless they are impeached.

Read More

Racial Inequality In Prisons

119 Words | 1 Pages

The system allows white people to believe that there is justice in the justice

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Judicial Branch

Related Topics

Open Document