ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Keystone XL Pipeline

1794 Words8 Pages

Keystone XL Pipeline Chances are the crude that traveled through the Keystone XL Pipeline, or a similar pipeline might be in our gas tanks. The Keystone XL Pipeline is a hotly contested pipeline that transports heavy crude from the tar sands of Alberta to American refineries in the Midwest or Gulf of Mexico to be used domestically or to be exported. (Domm par.3). The Keystone XL Pipeline needs to be constructed to help the United States wean off the use of foreign oil, have a minimal environmental impact, and allow for economic development. Furthermore, being energy independent is always helpful to that nation’s security and infrastructure. For example, when the Keystone XL Pipeline is built, the United States can shy away from purchasing …show more content…

It has been said that the electric car would mark the end to the mass production of crude oil, but that is far from the truth. One would think that the more electric vehicles on the road, the less consumption of crude oil and its byproducts, and that’s not true either. By 2040, the number of passenger vehicles will hit more than 1.8 billion worldwide. In that growth, only 10% will be electric vehicles. (Kazokoglu par.1) For the next 22 years, combustion type engines will be growing in production rather than shrinking, even with the introduction of electric vehicles to the mass market. The demand for crude oil from North America will be met by building the Keystone XL Pipeline. Have you ever priced an all-electric vehicle? The cost of an electric vehicle vs the cost of a standard vehicle is quite a difference, they’re just not affordable to the average family. Because of the continued surging demand for oil and the price of electric vehicles, the need for gasoline and crude oil products will not waiver in the future, so building the Keystone XL Pipeline needs to be built to supply the growing crude oil demand of a growing …show more content…

The Keystone Pipeline is being built during one of the most environmental conscious times that this country has ever had. One would have to think that TransCanada would ensure the safety and vitality of the Keystone pipeline. The pipeline will be under heavy surveillance during its operation. The pipeline will be closely watched “24 hours a day, 365 days a year” (Keystone Safety par.5) According to the Keystone XL website, shut off valves will allow a damaged pipeline to be shut down in minutes. The valves will be placed “every 20 miles with extra valves required to protect water crossings and other areas of higher consequence” (Keystone Safety par. 10). These valves will ensure for minimum environmental impact should a spill ever occur. The construction of the Keystone XL pipeline has the opportunity to show environmental activists that a safe, reliable and state-of-the-art pipeline can be built. Besides, don’t most vehicles run on fossil fuels? Until a complete substitution for crude oil is found, building the ultra-safe Keystone XL Pipeline makes the most logical sense. In the end, the goal is to help our nation by being both environmentally friendly but yet, construct a feasible and futuristic pipeline that will benefit us all in the years

Show More
Related
1248 Words | 5 Pages

The Keystone Pipeline is a series of metal pipes that run from Alberta Canada to Patoka, Illinois and Port Arthur, Texas. The pipes pass through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. The current Keystone Pipeline transports approximately 700,000 barrels of oil a day from Canada to Texas. (n.d.) The Keystone XL Pipeline is a proposed 1,700 mile expansion to the current pipeline, which would branch west, impacting an additional state, Montana, and end in Cushing Oklahoma.

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

With the proposed Keystone XL pipeline there are many environmental and safety standards that would be enforced to ensure that concerns such as oil leaks are detected, fixed and cleaned up properly and quickly. If the US government fails to approve the Keystone XL pipeline then they will have no control over enforcing the environmental safety standards for the transportation of Canada’s oil to the other countries that want to purchase

Read More
120 Words | 1 Pages

In my opinion I am against the pipeline. The negative effects out way the positives of the pipeline. To begin with, there isn't a real need for the pipeline, so why spend billions of dollars on a pipeline that isn't needed. The cost of the pipeline is extremely high whereas the pipeline might not actually be worth that much to the residents here. There would be taxes and fees that the residents and the business owners would have to pay to pay for the pipeline that could be avoided.

Read More
2524 Words | 11 Pages

First, there is often a misunderstanding of what crude oil is used for, “Crude oil is not exclusively used to produce gasoline. Crude oil is used to produce thousands of products that we use every day, not just gasoline and diesel. Crude oil feedstock is used to create the plastics that encase our cell phones and televisions, asphalt for our roads and even the latex gloves doctors use when delivering a baby. ”(Myths & Facts-TC) One of the production company’s executives criticized the misinformed by saying, “The people suggesting that the oil Keystone XL will transport will be used to exclusively to make gasoline or diesel is simply a guess and they know that.”

Read More
171 Words | 1 Pages

The biggest issues facing my community is the Marcellus and Utica shale gas drilling boom. There are many pros and cons involved. I would like to address a few of them here. The pros are mostly economic advantages like, jobs, increased local tax bases and lower consumer prices for natural gas and other products that come out of the wells with it. Some of the cons are increased traffic on roads that are not designed to handle that volume.

Read More
2089 Words | 9 Pages

The environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy

Read More
1306 Words | 6 Pages

The Keystone XL pipeline would create up to 20,000 direct jobs and 118,000 spin-off jobs (Palliser 2012, 10), which could give a boost to the local economy. Moreover, it would give more energy security, which would make the United States less dependent on countries like Saudi Arabia. It would also stimulate the United States’ economy because the communities along the pipeline’s route would benefit from $5.2 billion in property taxes as long as the pipeline is in use (Palliser 2012, 11). The risks involved in building this pipeline could be devastating for the environment and the people who live on these lands and drink the water. “Oil-sands crude is more corrosive to pipelines than normal crude oil and difficult to clean up if spilled […]

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

The debate of whether or not the pipeline should be built or not, has brought a lot of attention throughout Canada. Many people stand for and against it, just as there is pros and cons for both sides. Time is almost up as it is coming down to the final decision of whether or not it is going to be continued or discontinued. There are more benefits from the expansion of this pipeline for Canada and even the rest of the world. I believe that the Trans Mountain Pipeline should be built because it can help benefit and could come to terms peacefully among Indigenous communities, regulates environmental safety precautions to prevent damage to the environment, and will overall increase the boost of Canada’s economy.

Read More
1686 Words | 7 Pages

Oil fracking has caused a lot of controversy the last couple years. Many believe that it is causing more harm than good. The House Committee of Natural Recourses had an entire meeting discussing oil fracking on federal managed and Native Lands. It also uses an incredible amount of water and chemicals.

Read More
1764 Words | 8 Pages

The initial proposal in the 1970s for the construction of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline was remarkable not only because of the scale of the project, but also the controversy that it generated within Canada. As a piece of infrastructure it would have been a landmark development in Canada 's resource extraction industry in the North, but ultimately never left the planning stage. The research, publications, and political discourse concerning it have found new relevance decades later, with a contemporary Mackenzie Gas Project having already recieved regulatory approval, but having yet to break ground (Krugel, 2015). The focus of this paper is an examination of the original project, including details of the planned path, rationale for construction,

Read More
998 Words | 4 Pages

After review an abandonment order will be issue, and specific conditions must be satisfied before the order takes effect. This order is design to address any risk to public safety, property and the environment. CONCLUSION Lots of public out-lash has occurred after the resent approval of the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion project. The public has many concerns and traditional debates about nature and economy has been streamed over the media in recent days.

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

Do you think the sun, wind, and corn can save our economy? Pro-quest staff reports the United States gets a majority of oil imported from their countries which can be a point of concern in fuel cost. The United States has the option on being independent which would allow us to control and help regulate the pricing and usage better (proquest staff). This paper will examine the pro, con, and my view point on whether biofuel is the best way to reduce United States dependency on foreign oil. To begin with, is biofuel the best way to reduce United States dependency on foreign oil?

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

It’s that simple” (Wheeler). After the nation concludes fracking, America can perhaps continue researching possible ways to extract the oils. The process of fracking offers several benefits to our nation, but not at the expense of the environment and human lives. By researching ways to avoid the waste getting into aquifers or causing earthquakes the process can eventually reap the benefits.

Read More
230 Words | 1 Pages

What -- The problem that motivated the research Natural gas pipelines are vulnerable to unwanted contaminants, which can cause an adverse result on the system. For the desired success of the pipeline, the ownership company needs to apply a system in order to detect these unwanted contaminants to allow for proper treatment. So what -- What is the impact of the problem

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

The U.S needs the Dakota Access Pipeline For months, people have been gathering in North Dakota to stand against the construction of an oil pipeline project. The Dakota Access Pipeline will run for 1,172 miles delivering as much as 570,00 barrels of crude oil a day from North Dakota to Iowa and connecting to other pipelines in Illinois. Currently, celebrities, environmentalists, and political activists are some who are standing with Native Americans to protest the pipeline because it will disturb sacred lands, is hazardous to the environment if it leaks, and it is too close to the water supply at Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. However, protesters are being reassured that the pipeline will rest 92 feet beneath the riverbed, will have thicker pipes, and with controlled valves will lower the chances of an incident. Protesters should allow the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline to proceed because it will boost the economy, help our

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Keystone XL Pipeline

Open Document