Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Problems with the electoral college
Problems with the electoral college
Electoral.college easays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Problems with the electoral college
Problems with the electoral college
Electoral.college easays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
However, many states make a requirement for the electors to vote for the candidate with the most votes of that state. The Electoral College was originally created to prevent the people of the United States from having too much power. Mainly because the creators of the Constitution, were very wary of any one group acquiring too much power. Also, at the time of the creation of the Constitution, it was almost impossible for citizens to be able to go and cast
The Electoral College is a system of voting created by the writers of the Constitution. The main goal of the Electoral College was to ensure that the citizens of the United States could not elect the president directly. The writers of the Constitution believed that the voters would not be properly educated on who they were voting for and consequently make a poor choice. The Electoral College is no longer in need today given that the public is adequately educated on the candidates for elections as a result of the excess amount of communication today. The Electoral College should be abolished because small states are over represented, the system is unfair to third party candidates, and a tie leads to a vote in the House of Representatives.
This way many states get to see the candidate and get to hear from them. The Electoral College gives a balance between big states and small states.
The Electoral College, in states where they have the winner takes all system, make voters that are voting in states that are strongly controlled by the a certain political party feel like their votes aren’t really important considering that all the electoral votes will just go to the political party that wins. This feeling like out votes don’t count is the biggest argument against the Electoral College that it should’ve been for quite a while already a popular vote decision not an Electoral College decision (Davis). This argument also goes hand and hand where a president and vice president voted into office won because of the popular vote and received a majority of the support. Also removing the Electoral College would remove the power that only a certain states have, the swing states, but the downfall is swing states will just be replaced with high population states. Some people also view the Electoral College as being undemocratic especially in large population states where the votes of the losing political party, are a large number of voters, are essentially
Proponents of the Electoral College argue that state viewpoints are more important than political minority viewpoints. We shouldn’t tamper with the careful balance of power between the national and state governments. Overall, they believe that the Electoral College has functioned for over 200 years and find the existing system extremely efficient because they feel that electors represent their constituents Proponents of the Electoral College believe that a popular vote would create numerous deficiencies in the system by making candidates too uniform and making them liable to deceptions of the truth (Pass or Fail, 2000). Why change a system that has functioned and elected a handful of respected and successful presidents? The real question though is, has this system truly worked flawlessly for over 200 years, or do we just think it has?
The United States Electoral College is a system that has been in place since the country's founding, and it has been the subject of much debate and controversy over the years. Some argue that the Electoral College is outdated and should be replaced with a popular vote system, while others believe that it serves an important purpose in the American political system. The electoral college has lead to fair and democratic elections for over 200 years, removing it would ruin fair elections, lead to less voter participation and could even lead to more corrupt leaders. The Electoral College provides power to small states and swing states.
Electoral College: For the Lose One view to consider that when voting for a president through the electoral college , voters are confused about the election process no more than they are unprepared of the consequences they ace of their votes not being counted. Voting by popular vote when electing a president is the best choice contrary to the electoral college; in favor of defying the people. Americans vote in order to elect a president of their preference to run our country. Voting by popular vote surpasses the whole electoral process by giving the people not just what they want, but what Americans need. Direct election of presidents remains solid as opposed to the “faithless” electoral college.
In a popular vote, voting fraud is much easier to commit. In electoral College, fraud does little to affect the entire election but in a popular vote, voter fraud will have a much greater effect. Furthermore, Popular vote does not get smaller states and minorities involved in the election. Some may argue that Electoral college is unfair because someone could win the popular vote and lose the whole election because they did not win the Electoral College. This is a flawed argument because the point of the election is to get everyone opinion and in the popular vote only the majority's opinion matters.
The Framers believed that implementing an Electoral College would help balance interests between the high-population and low-population states. “Opponents of the Electoral College believed that the system should be scrapped, stating that it was fundamentally flawed” (Stepman 2017). “One Founding-era argument for the Electoral College stemmed from the fact that ordinary Americans
In 2020 around 33% of Americans didn't vote for a president according to a poll by NPR.Recently, there have been some proposals in congress to change the electoral college system, from a normal system to a popular vote system. There were many different proposals to change the electoral college in the early 2000s, but none of them were passed. Although some people see the electoral college as unnecessary, without it, Electing our next president would be unfair to the people and the state The Electoral College is the system that gives small and big states an equal vote in presidential elections, used by almost every state in the U.S, and without it, electing a president would be much harder and unfair to the state and people. The United States has a very important process to electing a president known as the Electoral College, and because of it, it gives small and big states the equal votes to be fair in elections.
The United States democratic political system serves to pursue practices that are quite undemocratic. The flawed principles consist of an abundance of issues with a major one being the electoral college. This controversial practice is a heated argument amongst politicians and everyday civilians. The real question is however, is the system in place the prime resolution to maintain a democracy in which the people’s vote actually count? The Electoral College should be abolished with the amount of complications instilled in it and be replaced by a popular vote implementation in order to have a healthy and equal democracy.
An Undated Practice: The Electoral College Founded at a time of great uncertainty, in a struggle between state and federal power, the electoral college was created as a means to compromise. Intricate and complex, this system is discriminatory to each individual of the population; most Americans are oblivious to this fact. In addition, candidates may win their election without winning the popular vote. After the votes have been cast, loyal electors may betray the people whom they represent and select the unpopular candidate.
These are all reasons why the current electoral college system should be abolished and should be replaced by a popular vote system. One of the biggest problems with the electoral college is that everyone’s vote is not equal. People’s votes mean more in less populated states like Wyoming than a person who lives in California. The system tries to make up for this by giving each state a different number of electoral votes.
The Electoral College’s opponents believe that it is an unfair way of doing things because it doesn’t necessarily make every vote count, but they may not realize that it lets every state have a say. The candidate with an absolute majority in each state receives the elector’s votes, therefore it really boils down to a popular election just on a state by state basis, rather than a national one. “The proposals to abolish the Electoral College are proposals to abolish the Federal principle in presidential elections”(Best). The Electoral College has history on it’s side, the system they use really works, it is the best option we have, and it needs to be
Thomas Jefferson wanted everyone to be able to vote but Alexander Hamilton did not want everyone to vote because he did not want the uneducated voting. He believed that the uneducated would not make the logical decision. The electoral college bridged the uneducated and the educated in terms of voting for the presidential election. When the electoral college was created, communication was inefficient and the technology was underdeveloped. By having delegates/electors representing a state and district it made it easier to vote with limited technology and communication.