Pros And Cons Of The Voting Rights Act Of 1965

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed in order to move forward towards equality in voting in the United States. The Amendments passed in 1982 included providing aid and instruction for any voters that needed extra assistance, for example someone disabled or illiterate. It also required there to be bilingual ballots and other voting materials in jurisdictions where there were large amounts of minority populations. This allowed many Spanish-speaking citizens to vote. The Amendment also “allowed jurisdictions that could provide evidence of maintaining a clean voting rights record for at least 10 years, to avoid preclearance coverage” to change any voting laws in that state, (“Constitutional Amendments”). The purpose of these Amendments was

If given the choice, there are advantages and disadvantages to both sides. Being in the minority party with more representation has a lot of strong sides of the argument, leading it to seem like the better option. Overall, it is important to have any representation at all, but the more, the better. If there are more people pushing for legislation in the area that is most needed by the minority community, that is going to make a difference, whether they are in the majority party or not. This ensures the idea that everyone’s perspectives are being seen and heard regardless. There is also always going to be strength in numbers, so while the representatives may be in the minority party, there are still multiple people that are willing to come together and push for the change necessary. This is especially important in that they could come together to ensure that the majority party is being held responsible for their decisions and that they are fulfilling needs from both