Pros And Cons Of Two Political Parties

714 Words3 Pages

Being an everyday American citizen, it is common to hear someone ask “Are you Red or Blue?”, or even “Are you an Elephant or Donkey?” To a foreigner this may seem like odd questions to ask. However; in the land of the red, white, and blue, these are simple questions to get an insight on someone’s political views. In the United States of America, we have a two major political parties that controls the general government. These two political parties are the Democrats (red; donkey) and the Republicans (blue; elephants). Moreover, for someone runs in the presidential race it is imperative for that individual to be under a political party. To be labelled under a certain political party, it illustrates to the average American citizen/voter your position …show more content…

Consequently, the two party system makes the outcome of a third-party in a candidacy inevitably unsuccessful. For example, the recent presidential race held two major candidates Hilary Clinton (Democrat) and Donald J. Trump (Republican). Within a normal presidency race the third party usually fail to get a single electoral vote due to the inconveniency in contesting a two party system race. However, in disapproval of Clinton and Trump, ten electors cast their votes for other candidates. Most of these went to other Republicans and Democrats, but two votes went to third parties one in which was Ron Paul a libertarian. Additionally, a consequence of having a two party system is the constant standstill on issues. With the Democrats and Republicans relentlessly fighting, they cannot come to agreements on key issues. For example, the recent commotion on Healthcare. Former President Barack Obama, who was a Democrat, implemented the Affordable Care Act against the views of the Republicans. Instead of expanding and improving the many weak areas of the Act, the majority of the Republican party insisted on repelling and replacing. Recently in the July of 2017 under the term of President Trump, a Repulican, The New York Times reported 43 republicans voted for the Repel and Replace Amendment. This illustrates the consistency of the fighting and disagreements, rather than the parties coming together to address an issue and working together to make it