Provenza Case Summary

200 Words1 Pages
Conclusion: Based on the overall facts of this case and the rules of law it is obvious that the evidence found on December 20, 2014, by Officer Provenza, should be included at trial. Looking back to the very initial stop of professor plum the officer had enough reasonable suspicion to make the stop. The results of .16 from the breathalyzer test gave officer Provenza the probable cause needed in order to make an arrest. The search of Professor Plums Person is then justified by the lawful arrest. In addition, (SITA) allows officer Provenza to protect himself and prevent destruction or concealment of evidence by conducting a search that is contemporaneous with the arrest. Lastly, because Professor Plum was driving while under the influence of

More about Provenza Case Summary