ipl-logo

Ptp And Real Life Case Study Essay

535 Words3 Pages

Having discussed the influence of PTP and real-life case studies, the final section addresses different remedies to counteract PTP. There are numerous remedies juries in courts can utilize to reduce biases and negative consequences of PTP during trial, such as continuance, voir dire, judicial instructions, jury deliberation and change of venue as a counteractive for PTP.

First, continuance. Within American law, continuance is the process of postponing a trial due to unforeseen circumstances or other reasonable cause. The time delay is suggested to decrease the influence of information available by forgetting. It would most likely reduce the direct influence of PTP. Davis (1986) investigated the direct effects of a 1-week delay and found little effect for delay. However, without delay, there was no influence, therefore, the study was equivocal. Additionally, continuance over several days in a mock trial produced an effective remedy for publicity in terms of factual information (Kramer et al., 1990). Therefore, a delay of a few days may reduce the impact of PTP on juries …show more content…

Siebert et al., (1970) denoted that vior dire was the most used remedy to combat bias in PTP. The method is influential when examining for prejudice and bias due to PTP as it prompts thorough questioning and investigation of what or who is present during trial. In a study, 158 participants were questioned on the judgement and fairness of a defendant in a criminal case and found that those who acknowledged being bias still revealed bias in their decisions (Sue et al., 1975). Additionally, voir dire was described to reduce the effect of media and news coverage, however, results presented exhibited an escalation in condemnation and convictions of those who were shown ‘neutral' media reports, which may be explained by confounding variables (Padawr-Singer et al.,

Show More
Related
773 Words | 4 Pages

The first evident display of injustice in the case of Steven Avery and Brenden Dassey is the jury’s bias. In the early days of this case, media coverage and the infamous press conference given by Ken Kratz, which described Avery as an “evil

Read More
1082 Words | 5 Pages

Criminal trials are not perfect, but by requiring evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, they can prevent several miscarriages of justice. Considering that innocent individuals may arrive at trial for misidentification, police misconduct or simply being in the wrong place at the wrong time, these individuals are at a disadvantage since by being offered plea deals they avoid trial and avoid the burden of “ beyond a reasonable doubt,” required to be pronounced guilty. Thus, in a CJ system saturated with cases, plea bargains become a mechanism for prosecutors and defense attorneys to bypass trials. For defendants, the fear of incarceration and the unpredictability of juries or judges create the conditions of coercion that might persuade defendants to prefer plea deals over

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

Usually, although not always, unfairly prejudicial evidence appeals to the jury's emotions rather than intellect.”

Read More
829 Words | 4 Pages

This also required that a new trial be conducted with the advantage and constitutional right of legal counsel appointed by the court. Justice Sutherland proceeded to state that no attempt was made to investigate the trial, that the trial was rushed, and the defendants had no time to prepare a case. The majority of the United States Supreme Court concluded that a defendant, who is charged with a serious as well as heinous crime, must not be omitted of his constitutional right to have ample time to discuss and prepare his

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

On the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.

Read More
158 Words | 1 Pages

The claim “justice is supposed to be blind”, made by Malcolm Gladwell in an episode of “The State v. Johnson”, is thoroughly authentic. Throughout the years, people have been prejudiced in some way or another, and was seen to be acceptable at times. Consecutively, when taking law into consideration, prejudice and biased opinions should be pushed aside.

Read More
2296 Words | 10 Pages

Charlotte Lester English 12 Ms. Knezevich May, 8, 2023 Undue Credibility and Injustice The modern court of law is incomplete without the inconsistencies of eyewitness accounts, the complexity of plea bargains, and the internal bias that every member of the police, jury, and even the judge holds. In the case of Adnan Syed, the potential killer of ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee, it was confirmation bias that put him behind bars for twenty-three years of his life. Due to the impending pressure to give justice to Lee and her family, the state investigation led the case with evidence formulated to fit their favourite story. Where naturally, convictions should be based on evidence, Syed’s case was the complete opposite.

Read More
2189 Words | 9 Pages

https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=143703 This paper will seek to define the right to a speedy trial in regard to both federal and state law. In the text I will cover a few case examples, various guidelines, and render a thorough analysis regarding the right to a speedy trial. The 6th amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 ensure a criminal respondent's entitlement to a rapid trial.

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

With the public’s bias, this court case was

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

Potential flaws in the American judicial system have been highlighted by the Casey- Anthony trial. The mother of murdered Caylee Anthony has been apprehended. Many people were shocked by the 2011 decision to find Anthony not guilty. The trial brought to light issues with the American justice system, including the inability of the poor to afford legal counsel, the influence of random selection on the composition of jurors, and the effect of biased media on public charges of crime. The efforts of those in the criminal justice system saved a potentially disastrous consequence.

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

Guilty or not guilty, all citizens deserve a thorough trial to defend their rights. Formulating coherent stories from events and circumstances almost cost a young boy his life. In Twelve Angry Men, 1957, a single juror did his duty to save the life of an 18 year old boy by allowing his mind to rationalize the cohesive information presented by the court and its witnesses. The juror’s name was Mr. Davis, he was initially the only one of 12 jurors to vote not guilty in reason that the young boy, sentenced with first degree murder, may be innocent. I am arguing that system 1 negatively affects the jurors opinion on the case and makes it difficult for Mr. Davis to convince the other jurors of reasonable doubt.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

For example, an individual may connect to the person on trial by race, gender, ethnicity or commonality between the defendant and someone from their personal life. May also occur with events and situations being discussed on trial. Author Veronica Roth stated that “no matter how smart, people usually see what they 're already looking for, that 's all”, and this applies to the justice system in the sense that looking past the biases is and always will be difficult because one tends to ignore evidences because of overwhelming emotions from bias (Roth). It is ideal to have impartial jurors whom will seek to be fair and will endeavor to correct potential bias in the courtroom in themselves, but it is not logical.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

The jury system has cases where jurors are influenced by the media because it is almost impossible to find someone who has not heard about the case and formed a personal opinion already (Doc F). In widely known cases, jurors may have been influenced by outsiders and the media indirectly and directly. For example, in the People vs. O.J. Simpson case, the infamous decision might have been made because of the jurors discussing the case with people who they are not suppose to discuss it with. An argument can be made that jurors are specifically instructed not to discuss the case or read anything about it, but there is no way to verify that the jurors are actually following this rule. Jurors can also have personal bias because they are very different from the defendant or prosecution (Doc E).

Read More
844 Words | 4 Pages

This may cause the jury to be indecisive between what the actual case and what the media portrays it to be. The amount of media released for cases creates a negative impact within the courts and makes it difficult for a fair trial. When juries are uncertain about a case or a suspect, they result to social media platforms and news coverage that will provide them with more information and depth into the case. ‘’But if the case unfolds in the media, by the time a case gets to court, the supposedly impartial jury (or even the judge) may have already heard information and allegations (not admissible by court standards) that have caused them to seriously prejudice the parties’’. (Nedim, 2014).

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

In this paragraph, the advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury will be discussed. The main advantages are that juries introduce community values into the legal process and can influence the system (Joyce, 2013); they can achieve a sense of equity and fairness without enforcing unjust laws; in addition, juries are independent and neutral (Davies, 2015). Moreover, they guarantee participation from the public in a democratic institution (Hostettler, 2004), and represent the population thanks to the randomness with which jurors are decided (Davies, 2015). On the other hand, the most important disadvantages are that jurors have no prior contact with the courts, no training (Hostettler, 2004) and therefore they lack knowledge of law, courtroom proceedings (Joyce, 2013), and lack of ability to understand the legal directions (Thomas, 2010). Moreover, they must face evidence which is highly technical (Hostettler, 2004).

Read More

More about Ptp And Real Life Case Study Essay

Related Topics

Open Document