Punishment And The History Of Prison Reform Summary

787 Words4 Pages

The text that has most interested me so far is "Philosophical Theories of Punishment and the History of Prison Reform" by Christopher Sturr. In his text "Philosophical Theories of Punishment and the History of Prison Reform," Christopher Sturr examines the exploration of how the philosophical approaches can contribute to resolving the ongoing prison crisis. In this paper I aim to evaluate the argument by Sturr, focusing on the superiority of the critical social theory over moral theory in addressing the complexities of the prison system. I will do this by examining the role of philosophical perspectives in shaping reform efforts. While moral theories of punishment have been foundational in shaping common attitudes towards the justice system. …show more content…

(pg. 86. Unlike moral theories of punishment, critical social theory goes deeper into the underlying systemic issues that perpetuate mass incarceration. By seeing the power dynamics and historical injustices that are embedded within the criminal justice system, the social theory provides a better understanding of the root causes of the crisis. Moreover, the critical social theory advocates for actual transformative change. It emphasizes the need for real structural reforms that address issues like poverty, racism, and inequality. which are often linked to very high rates of incarceration. Critical social theory challenges ideologies and offers a better framework for creating a more equal and just society. To discuss the limitations of moral theories in addressing the complex issues of the prison system, it is important to note that moral theories of punishment have historically not been the best vehicle for addressing the prison crisis. Traditional moral justifications of punishment, like those presented in mainstream philosophy, often fall short in providing effective solutions to the challenges faced in the penal system. Moral theories may critique current penal institutions and practices, but they may not offer practical guidance for designing alternatives or for creating positive social change in the system. This limitation is evident in the history of …show more content…

Critical social theory emphasizes the importance of analyzing prisons within the broader context of social structures, power dynamics, and relationships in society. Unlike moral theories that may focus solely on justifications for punishment, critical social theory considers how systems of dominance and subordination contribute to the perpetuation of issues in the penal system. By integrating theory and practice and drawing on the experiences and needs of prisoners and communities affected by mass incarceration, critical social theory provides a more holistic and practical lens for reform