Critical Thinking Research Paper

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking is the fundamental skills to analyze arguments make inferences by using induction of deductive reasoning, judge or identify problems. According to Richard Paul that masters a process of making and producing, criticality a process of assessing and judging. Background knowledge is necessary but not the most important component to enable critical thought for a given subject. Critical thinking implicates both cognitive skills and objectives. These objectives, which can be seen as opinions or habits of mind, include fairness, inquisitiveness, flexibility, and taking diverse viewpoints. However, people cannot focus on these terms in practical every day. This paper is going to develop these insights.

It is important

If thinking lacks a purpose, it is meaningless. Thinking may chance upon something of cherished to the thinker, but more often will simply wander into an endless stream of unanalyzed associations. For the most time, people are “naturals” at meaningless thinking such as daydreaming or fantasizing.

People should always take care of the good principles of thinking, and be reflective about their own reasoning. In addition, they often make a conscious effort to improve themselves, avoid prejudices, and keep objectivity. However, this is certainly difficult to do it. All the people are able to think, but want to think well usually need a long time of training. The grasp of critical thinking is quite similar to the grasp of many other

Consistent exercise can improve only if one has the correct kind of motivation and attitude. The following attitudes are not uncommon, but people are barriers to critical thinking such that “I do not like to be criticized” and “I do not usually criticize the errors I have made in the past”. To improved thinking skill, people should confess that the key of reflecting on the reasons for religion and operation. They should also be willing to undertake in debate, forget old habits, and deal with language complexities and abstract concepts. For example just found via internet, “If it takes 5 mice 5 minutes to eat 5 cheese, how long would it take 100 mice to make 100 cheese?”. What is interesting about the problem is that it has a “presentational” answer which is practically wrong. To get the problem right, people would need to inhibit their immediate response and reply carefully to come to the right answer. This is ostensible to reflect the potential for considered and reflective argumentation and to prevent jumping steps to get conclusions. Researchers request that the short test exactly provides a rather good standard of rational thinking and cognitive