ipl-logo

R V. Frieson Case Study

549 Words3 Pages

In R v. Frieson, Judge Ouellette referred to 5 cases and 2 statutes outlined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 2 statutes from the Constitution Act, and 12 statues from the Criminal Code. The issue with this particular case laid in the fact that Frieson believed the imposition of a three-year mandatory minimum sentence for this offence constituted as cruel and unusual punishment; the defendant was not aware of Mr. Froese’s depression when he sold him both firearms. Despite only having a license to sell non-prohibited firearm ammunition at the time, Friesen cooperated with investigators and was honest about continuing to sell firearms from his store despite not having a license, even after Mr. Froese’s death. Judge Oulette was …show more content…

Frieson?. For the first issue, “Does the three-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment, set out in section 99(2), violate section 12 of the Charter?”, Judge Oullette differentiated between the intended purpose behind Parliament’s mandatory minimum sentencing and the sentencing objectives. Bill C-10 was created in order to place a stop to handguns, drug trafficking, and gang violence. The facts pertaining to this case do not deal with these issues, and thus the concern falls on Freisen not having a license to sell firearms. Judge Ouellette determined the Froese did not intend to commit a criminal or illegal act with the gun, and found the three-year mandatory minimum is unconstitutional. For the second issue, “if it does, should this Court declare that section null and void under section 52 of the Constitution Act 1982?”, Judge Ouellette decided to adopt the reasoning in the Supreme Court decision in R. v. Nur. Both subsections 95 and 99 have the same purpose which is to target criminal and illegal activities related to gun and street violence. Therefore, he decided that

Show More
Related
1700 Words | 7 Pages

The Australian Crime Commission: the sentencing of offenders in the New South Wales criminal justice system Cases: - R v Dean [2013] NSWSC 1027 - R v David John STEVENS [2014] NSWDC 197 Section One Case 1: R v Dean [2013] Elements of the offence: Actus Reus: Roger Dean pleaded guilty to eleven counts of murder by way of reckless indifference to human life, and eight counts of recklessly causing grievous bodily harm ( s 18 and s 35 (2) Crimes Act 1990) . The offence occurred in the early hours of November 18th , 2011. The actus reus of the offender, Roger Dean has been proved by the prosecution upon the investigation of the case. CCTV footage from the Quaker’s Hill Nursing Home shows Roger Dean repeatedly walking in and out of multiple

Read More
212 Words | 1 Pages

MILLERSBURG — A Newcomerstown man last week denied criminal charges he was in the possession of drugs and a gun during a March traffic stop. Kristopher L. Lanning, 31, of 420 Pearl St., pleaded not guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to trafficking in marijuana, carrying a concealed weapon, improper handling of firearms in a motor vehicle and turning at an intersection. If convicted, Lanning faces up to 18 months in prison for the most serious offense.

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

The given source proposes initiative measure No.594 regarding background checks for sales and transfer of guns. Initiative measure No.594 consists of three main part with its subparts. It includes: explanatory statement proclaiming the current law regarding gun distribution and its foreseen consequences that will apply to the current law if the measure is approved; fiscal impact statement including general assumptions, state revenue assumptions, state revenues, state expenditure assumptions, state expenditures, local government revenue assumptions, local government revenues, local government expenditure assumptions, local government expenditures; arguments against and arguments for measure No.594 coming into force. The main controversy of the document is a wobbly balance between a

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

In this case, a divided married couple Charles and Tracey Thurman experienced a vicious split-up. Documents report, the first time Tracey had contact with the Torrington Police Department (TPD) (October 1982) was after her husband became violent towards Charles Thurman, Jr (son) out of the residence. Sadly, officers from the TPD refused to take Tracey's complaint resulting in the escalation of Charles violent behavior. As the violence escalated on November 09, 1982 while Tracey was sitting in her vehicle Charles approached, and started yelling threats and untimely resulting in him smashing her windshield. This was all witnessed by TPD Officer Neil Gemelli as he stood on the street watching Charles activities.

Read More
1454 Words | 6 Pages

Business Law Case Study Essay: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S (2014) Facts: The Green family runs and owns Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., a national arts and skills chain that has over 500 stores and they have over 13,000 employees. Other facts of the case are that the Green family has been able to organize the business around the values of the Christian faith and has explicitly expressed the desire to run the company as told by Biblical principles, one of which is the belief that the utilization of contraception is wicked. Also, the facts show that under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), occupation -founded group health care plans must offer certain sorts of preventative care, for example, FDA-accepted contraceptive approaches.

Read More
1405 Words | 6 Pages

The Top Five Canada (Justice) v. Khadr Do you think the charter should always apply to the activities of the Canadian government officials exercising functions outside Canada? I concur with the Federal court's findings in that, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were created to protect the rights and freedoms of Canadian citizens in Canada. Outside of Canada, citizens are protected by international laws between sovereign states. Therefore, crimes committed in other judicial sanctions should be dealt with by their own court of law, without interference of other countries sovereignty. The case of R. v. Cook is an exception; Canadian authorities interrogated Cook, a Canadian citizen, outside of Canada.

Read More
1344 Words | 6 Pages

The case of R. v. Schoenborn is a troubling case involving the death of three children and the defence of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder. This defence must be critically analyzed along with the evidence and expert opinions as it could absolve the accused of the charges. As well, the precedent that the verdict provides is critical to the legal system and its future implication and thus give the decision more importance. After a thorough examination of the facts, it is evident that the verdict of the Supreme Court of British Columbia is correct and reflects the administration’s objectives and beliefs. This will be demonstrated through the application of legal principles and elements.

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

In 2013, the Supreme Court case Moncrieffe v. Holder refuses a Board of Immigration Appeals to removal from the United States of a lawful permanent resident based on a long term criminal conviction related to sole possession of small amounts of marijuana. The case finally made it all the way to the Supreme Court, which is considered a rather technical question of the interpretation of the U.S Immigration laws. Local police departments have long been accused of profiling Hispanic, African-Americans, and other minorities of race in law enforcement activities, including run of the mill traffic stop. Critics fear that immigration enforcement by state and local authorities will lead to increase of racism. Many Americans have shown concerns with the implementation of racist discrimination of the U.S immigration laws by state police agencies and local authorities.

Read More
1280 Words | 6 Pages

Other Notable Post War Interstate Operators Alongside Reg Ansett and Rex Law. To provide a reasonably comprehensive understanding of the overall state of play within the long distance industry in which Reg Ansett and Rex Law were new entrants, I will provide here some relevant if not entirely comprehensive historical information about each of the other players lined up to compete after the war. There were other largely regional operators in the mix who would later venture onto the long distance stage, such as Greyhound, Kirkland Bros and New England Motor co. The latter had introduced touring car based passenger services between Brisbane and Sydney in the 1930’s, yet would not continue to develop or expand such services post war.

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

In 1945, the High Court of Australia heard the case of Gratwick v Johnson and ultimately decided to dismiss the appeal in a unanimous decision by the Judges. While different reasoning was employed, all five judges drew the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed as the statute the defendant was charged under was inconsistent with s.92 of the Australian Constitution. To provide some context for this case in 1944, Dulcie Johnson was charged with an offence against the National Security Act 1939-1943 in that she did contravene par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order by travelling from South Australia to Western Australia by rail. In brief terms par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order provided that no person shall, without a valid permit, travel from state to state or territory.

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

On the case of R. v. Noway, the court renders Noway not-guilty of the charges put forth on him which is the violation of the known and enacted criminal law 253 - operation of a motor vehicle while impaired. Criminal law seeks to provide justice to society. To be charged with a criminal offense, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime has been committed. This ‘burden of proof’ precedent was established in R. v. Oaks case which enacted that, all elements of the criminal code must be met including the mental intention; in order for the courts to exercise their authority and punish an accused person. Moreover, the rule of law [(1) that the laws are known and enacted, (2) government action is authorized by law and (3) everyone is bound by the law] also renders laws to avoid arbitrariness so that it is clear when a person is in violation of the criminal code.

Read More
1217 Words | 5 Pages

Mandatory minimum sentences are sentences mandated by law for

Read More
1434 Words | 6 Pages

 Mandatory minimum sentencing policies were set into action with good intentions, but the law did not turn out as expected. The mandatory minimum sentencing acts were created to provide equality that every offender of the particular crime will serve the same punishment. This ensures that there will be no bias. They were expected to lower crime rates, because people will possibly think twice before committing a crime if the mandatory minimum sentence is five year or if they have been convicted before, they will not want to be incarcerated again for double the time. Judges cannot change the sentence.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

A study conducted by the Connecticut General Assembly investigated Mandatory Minimum Sentences, seeking to find factual evidence to support whether or not they are beneficial to the community. One thing they discover was that the crime does not always

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

R v Caldwell [1981] 1 All ER 961 James Caldwell had grievance against the owner of the hotel where he worked. So one night he got very drunk and set fire to the hotel. Caldwell was indicted upon two counts of arson. The second count was laid under section 1 (1) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971-arson destroying property belonging to another. The first and more serious count was laid under section 1 (2) of the 1971- arson endangering life.

Read More

More about R V. Frieson Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document