ipl-logo

Rationalism And Enlightenment Analysis

702 Words3 Pages

“According to the text “rationalism” is based on deductive logic reasoning from the general to particular or applying theory to a particular case; however, “empiricism” is based on inductive logic reasoning from particular to general or moving from specific facts to theory” (Bohm & Vogel, 2011, p. 14). I believe people who commit crime consider the consequences of their actions; however, I think they base it on the punishment rendered, or they just don’t care. Crime is not the result of a criminal personality; nevertheless, it’s a poorly integrated psyche because in my opinion people are not born criminals. People are of freewill and responsible for the actions. The Enlightenment thinkers believe that human behaviors were considered to be motived …show more content…

(Bohm & Vogel, 2011) People who option the conforming and deviant behavior will also consider the potential costs and benefits which will occur after they commit any crime. People choices are controlled by the understanding of the potential risks like pain or punishment; however, in my opinion, people rationally choose to commit crimes, and their crimes are evidence of their rational choices. Consequently, Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham proposed that each individuals stop oneself from doing thing to get out of fear from potential punishments will cause this result. (Bohm & Vogel, 2011) Therefore, the government needs to increase the penalty to reach a deterrence levels. “Classical theory assumes that there is a consensus in society, whereas people choose to enter into social contracts” (Bohm & Vogel, 2011, p. 19) People can assess the consequences of their outcomes and choose their course of action accordingly, that’s if they are willing to control their own behavior. (Hollander-Blumoff, 2017) However, I don’t believe people think of the consequences of the heat of passion. “The actus reus requirement includes an insistence that an action be voluntary or a deliberate movement by one’s body is distinct, legally, from an involuntary physical movement” (Hollander-Blumoff, 2017). People who are not capable of controlling their actions to comport with their cost and benefit analyses versus those who are genuinely not able to exercise self-control are not appropriately punished under the deterrence theory. (Hollander-Blumoff,

More about Rationalism And Enlightenment Analysis

Open Document