More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about prison industrial complex
Prison industrial complex
Relations between liberalism and conservatism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
President Johnson and President Reagan's visions of America were similar and different in many ways. President Johnson wants the Federal Government to be more involved solving problems of America compared to President Reagan, who wants less involvement of the Federal Government. Both Presidents want to make America as great as it can be, but they have their sights set on two different solutions. President Johnson wants to focus on making the quality of society better versus President Reagan, who wants to focus on economic fairness. These two Presidents are trying to accomplish the same goal to make America the best it can be, but it is being done with a Democratic and Republican point of view.
The video that I have chosen is Jayz War on Drugs (Epic Fail). This video informs you on how the war on drugs was started by Richard Nixon in 1971. It also describes how the war on drugs had a negative effect on the African Americans rather it be their families, communities, and schools. The movie The House I live in, describes the war on drugs as black hats vs white hats basically the good guys against the bad guys. In both videos it was discussed how poor neighborhoods were the target for drug bust areas.
In his article, “Toward a Policy on Drugs,” Elliot Currie discusses “the magnitude and severity of our drug crisis” (para. 21), and how “no other country has anything resembling the American drug problem” (para. 21). The best way to describe America’s drug problem is that it is a hole continuously digs itself deeper. America’s drug issues were likely comparable to other country’s at one point in time, but today it can be blamed on the “street cultures” (para. 21) that continue to use and spread the use of illegal drugs. These street cultures transcend the common stereotype of drug users, such as low income communities in cities or welfare recipients, and can be found in every economic class and location. They are groups of people who have
Reagan also started a war on crime where he tried to battle drugs, but the success of that is up for debate. With all these accomplishments, Reagan’s career is not all sunshine and butterflies. There is a very dark side to his presidential reign. The dark side of Reagan’s career begins with the Iran-Contra.
Robert DuPont is an American psychiatrist known, or rather, infamous for his works in the field of drugs in the US. He was one of the early detractors of marijuana. He even described it as one of "the most dangerous drug". A description wildly disproven by the current and even the scientific reports and studies back in his time.
In fact, total economic growth was almost identical, averaging about 4 percent per year, with Reagan edging out Clinton by less than 1 percentage point for the total eight-year period. Page 1 of 3 Page 2 of 3 Sami 1 Additionally both presidents shared many ideals, such as the opinion that Marijuana is a gateway drug; meaning that it is a drug thought to lead to the use of other dangerous drugs such as cocaine or heroine. As such, Reagan made an effort to create the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, giving the war on drugs a budget of $1.7 billion, and increase the severity of the punishments for any drug related offences.
Allies and Nazis' constant use of drugs and the important wartime inventions made during World War Two played pivotal roles in the war. Clayton Merritt Elizabeth Hornsey English1102 20230219 Introduction Allies and Nazis' constant use of drugs and the important wartime inventions made during World War Two played pivotal roles in the war. World War Two was a global conflict that occurred between 1939 and 1945. It was a war that changed the course of history and left a lasting impact on the world. During the war, the Allies and the Axis powers fought fiercely to gain world control (Tucker, 2018).
Reagans ‘War on Drugs” focused on stopping not only the use of drugs but the sales of drugs using harsh laws, like mandatory minimum sentences, three-strikes laws, that as previously mentioned had an intense focus and adverse effect on poor, disenfranchised black and brown men from urban neighborhoods. Thus, Republican Presidents Regan, Bush Senior and Bush Junior and Democrat Bill Clintons “war on drugs” policies and efforts tripled the U.S. prison populations that over the past that reflect substantive racial disparities. Therefore, “Racial Profiling’ though 300 years old became a huge problem during the “War on Drugs. As when carried forward from President Richard Nixon’s’ original 1971 declaration, that under subsequent presidencies, saw the number of people incarcerated in U.S. prison rise from 300,000 to 3 million, mostly
Life in Mexico can be very harsh, many people outside of Mexico believe life in the country isn’t as bad as it seems. Over the years the country has changed but still face many problems. The Mexican drug war is still a highly supplied conflict between the Mexican army and drug cartels in Mexico. The country has been one of the main suppliers of illegal drugs that causes discrimination, drug trafficking and many deaths yearly. The question is, how has life in Mexico changed before and after the war on drugs?
Two presidents emerged from the Cold War era of the 20th century that have influenced American policy even up to the present day. Reagan, a Republican during the “New Conservative” movement, held many differing views when compared to Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat from the 1960s who created the "Great Society." These two leaders had contrasting views on a range of issues, including the role of government, social issues, and foreign policy. One thing Reagan believed in was limited government. One of the main things the New Conservatives were worried about was the government overstepping their bounds when it should just be left up to the States.
In response, President Richard Nixon introduced a comprehensive plan to combat the rising trend. Creation of federal agencies and police forces, introduction of mandatory minimums into the court system, and notorious “no-knock warrants” all contributed to the anti-drug strategy that was the “War on Drugs.” The escalation of the War on Drugs only increased under the Reagan administration. Due to the anti-drug hysteria of the 80s, and Nancy Reagan's “Just Say No” anti-drug campaign. The Drug Policy Alliance reports that “the number of people behind bars for nonviolent drug law offenses increased from 50,000 in 1980 to over 400,000 by 1997” (“Brief History” 4, 7-8).
federal government's campaign to reduce the illegal drug trade but in this case we are focusing on The War on Drugs that mainly happened in 1968 during President Nixon presidency where many tactics were created, where the Fourth Amendment played a big role and where the SWAT was created as a response as a way to fight The War on Drugs. The War on Drugs plays a big part on of the mass incarceration that we have today. “The focus on War on Drugs is simple, Convictions for drug offenses are the single most important cause of the explosion in incarceration rates in the United States. Drug offenses alone account for two-thirds of the rise in the federal inmate population and more than half of the rise in state prisoners between 1985 and 2000.1 Approximately a half-million people are in prison or jail for a drug offense today, compared to an estimated 41,100 in 1980—an increase of 1,100 percent.2 Drug arrests have tripled since 1980” (Alexander, 60). This is important to class because we can see how The War on Drugs was suddenly implemented and how suddenly it took over black and brown neighborhoods which created many criminals, specially people of color from impoverished neighborhoods.
In 1972, former President Richard Nixon made his infamous statements regarding crime and drug abuse. In this speech, he declared a war on crime and drugs and intended to decrease the number of people using drugs and the amount of crimes that were committed. Since this declaration, incarceration rates in the U.S. have gone up by 500%, even though the amount of crime happening has gone down. One of the reasons why I feel our rates have risen, is because sometimes, we put people in jail when they don’t need to be there in the first place.
Essentially, the war on drugs has demonstrated to be an exorbitant expense. The federal government in 2002 alone spent $18.822 billion in the form of expenditures such as treatment, prevention, and domestic law enforcement (CSDP, 2007, p. 54). However, given that the drug war has garnered meager results, this investment may be interpreted as a waste of taxpayer dollars. Alternatively, the money that has been allocated to arrest and detain drug offenders may also be a source of contention. CSDP (2007) “Of the 1,846,351 arrests for drug law violations in 2005, 81.7% (1,508,469) were for possession of a controlled substance.
As of recent, the war on drugs has been a very often discussed topic due to many controversial issues. Some people believe the War on Drugs has been quite successful due to the amount of drugs seized and the amount of drug kingpins arrested. I believe this to be the wrong mindset when it comes to the war on drugs. The war on drugs isn’t a winnable one so we must do all that is possible to assist those who struggle with drug addiction and decriminalize small amounts of drugs. These minor changes in the way we combat drugs will create significant change and have lasting effects.
