ipl-logo

Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men, By Reginald Rose

323 Words2 Pages
In the play, Twelve angry men, by Reginald Rose, was about a trial to see if a boy was a murderer. It showed reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt is a standard of proof used in a criminal trial. A piece of evidence is the el train and the knife. The boy bought the murder weapon the night of the murder, he also showed it to three friends. The eighth juror says “Why show it to friends that could identify it.”(Rose 31). If somebody was going to commit murder why would they buy the knife the night of the murder, unless to show they just snapped. They would buy it before they committed the crime. This does not, however, answer the question of why he would showed the weapon to his friends. He would know they would be able to identify the weapon. The
Show More
Related
491 Words | 2 Pages

In today’s society, many people make bad decisions. In the novel, Monster by Walter Dean Myers, the narrator explains how one bad choice can lead to another. Steve Harmon, the narrator, was accused of being the lookout for a robbery which led to the murder of Mr. Nesbit and he goes on trial, debating whether he was an accessory to the murder. After reading the novel, one might think that Steve is not guilty because he didn’t kill Mr. Nesbitt and no witnesses saw him in the store. The jury has to decide if he was guilty for the murder, if he was guilty of being the lookout, and he even questions his innocence.

Read More
182 Words | 1 Pages

This past week has been rough for the Robinson family. After a racist jury choose to make an innocent man guilty things went from bad to worse. Atticus Finch was chosen to defend Tom Robinson. This particular case was against Mayella Ewell, a white woman. As a black man Tom was already at a disadvantage.

Read More
186 Words | 1 Pages

I believe people do have a tendency to allow their prejudices to direct their decisions. People have their prejudices, feel they are right and go along with that feeling. A great example of this is Juror Three in Twelve Angry Men. He believed the boy murdered his father because he felt he did it.

Read More
406 Words | 2 Pages

In the play Doubt: A Parable, by John Patrick Shanley, Sister Aloysius is a representation of traditionalists as she constantly resists change and progression. Her traditionalist values are highlighted in her scene two conversation with Sister James. She says, “I’m sorry I allowed even cartridge pens into the school. The students really should only be learning script with true fountain pens. Always the easy way out these days” (9).

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Everyone makes mistakes, they know what they did wrong and they learn from is. In any situation being on trial for your life is hard enough. When your on trial for your life and being charged with murder and not even know what you did wrong is even worse. Steve Harmon, a 16-year-old film student, is on trial for felony murder.

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

Twelve Angry Men is a book about a kid who is on trial for murder of his father. A lot of evidence is brought forward, but most of the evidence is either circumstantial or does not add up with the witness testimony; therefore, the boy is innocent of all crimes charged against him. In the book, the two witnesses are the old man living downstairs and the woman living in the apartment on the other side of the el track. The old says that he heard the boy tell his father he is going to kill him, and then he heard the body hit the floor a second later.

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

Long before Tom Robinson is introduced into the novel, it is clearly known to the reader that ‘negroes’ are considered in the lower class and always convicted guilty, regardless of the truth. Tom is accused of sexual rape by Bob Ewell’s daughter, Mayella Ewell, who is an obnoxious young lady with an attraction to Tom. Sheriff Heck Tate testifies that Mayella was hit on the right side of her face. Tom’s lawyer, Atticus Finch, believes that this is crucial evidence for Tom’s case and asks Heck, repeatedly, to clarify that it was the right side of her face: “It was her right eye… Which side again Heck?... The right side Mr. Finch” (192).

Read More
1174 Words | 5 Pages

I am reading To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee and I am on page 304. This section of the novel is where Tom Robinson’s trial is commenced. It seems as if the whole town is eager for spectacle about to unwind, except for a few like Miss Maudie. Atticus tells Scout and Jem that he does not want to see them downtown, but they defy his wishes. Once the trial begins, Heck Tate is the first witness.

Read More
333 Words | 2 Pages

One piece of evidence that proves the boy’s innocence is accuracy of the Old man’s testimony. In the play the jurors are arguing over whether or not the man heard the phrase “I’m going to kill you”. According to evidence, the noise of the train passing would be much too loud to hear anything,

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Defense attorneys are considered to be one of the most important aspects of a case. The way they decide to go about their case effects verdicts immensely. Samuel Leibowitz, the defense attorney for the Scottsboro Boys case, and Atticus, from To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, are both defense attorneys put in difficult positions and tasked with controversial cases. They were given the difficult duty of defending a black man accused of raping a white woman, in a time filled with prejudice. A white woman’s word was always valued over a black man’s, making the case extremely arduous.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

Gentlemen of the Jury, before you write Miss Medea off as having been driven insane through grief and loss, some of the facts that have been presented today need to be put in order. First and foremost, homicide has occurred, and it has been done through the hand of the defendant. There is no arguing this fact; multiple witnesses have been brought forth to testify against this woman. These witnesses were present for the planning of all of the murders, and were threatened with death if they breathed a word of it. The only argument that the defense has left is to portray Medea as being insane.

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

Another piece of evidence is a woman who swears to have seen the young man stabbed the father through the last two windows of the train. The evidence says that she was asleep and when she woke up and turned to the window through the last two windows of the train, she was able to see how the young man stabbed his father. The only problem with this argument is that the woman wore bifocal glasses and nobody usually sleeps with glasses so it would be very difficult that without their lenses of such magnitude could see what actually

Read More
867 Words | 4 Pages

In the play Doubt: A Parable, John Patrick Shanley tackles the ever-important issues of abuse of power, oppression of minority groups, and, of course, certainty versus doubt in an enthralling account of sexual misconduct allegations within a Catholic school. Shanley explores several avenues of such overarching ideas through his drama and ultimately arrives at the conclusion that certainty and moral obligations ought to override faith and traditional order. This theme is developed through Shanley's impeccable use of foreshadowing, symbolism, and tone and ultimately leaves the audience in deep consideration of their own values of doubt and faith. From the title of the play to the opening scene, Shanley intricately weaves foreshadowing throughout his work. For instance, in Part I, Father Flynn gives a sermon on the dangers of doubt and the importance of faith (5-6), ironically foreshadowing a central

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

Reasonable doubt proves that critical thinking is important when someone’s life is in someone else’s hands. “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, is a play about twelve jury members who must deliberate and decide the fate of a man who is accused of murdering his father. These twelve men must unanimously agree on whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty without reasonable doubt. Just like the jurors, the readers of this play have not witnessed the crime that took place before the trial started. Everyone, but the writer, is in the dark about who committed the crime.

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

Because the jury did not favor black men, Tom Robinson did not receive a fair trial, although Atticus made a great case. Segregation directly disobeys the fourteenth amendment, “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.” Maycomb Alabama is where the story, To Kill a Mockingbird takes place. Tom Robinson’s trial out come was not based on factual evidence. Mayella was lying to the jury, while Tom was completely innocent.

Read More

More about Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men, By Reginald Rose

Related Topics

Open Document