ipl-logo

Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men, By Reginald Rose

323 Words2 Pages
In the play, Twelve angry men, by Reginald Rose, was about a trial to see if a boy was a murderer. It showed reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt is a standard of proof used in a criminal trial. A piece of evidence is the el train and the knife. The boy bought the murder weapon the night of the murder, he also showed it to three friends. The eighth juror says “Why show it to friends that could identify it.”(Rose 31). If somebody was going to commit murder why would they buy the knife the night of the murder, unless to show they just snapped. They would buy it before they committed the crime. This does not, however, answer the question of why he would showed the weapon to his friends. He would know they would be able to identify the weapon. The
Open Document