Reasoning for Rewritten Article
When this news article was first examined, it seems to be written very poorly. The article mostly appeared to be short quotes from the research article, and did not provide very many details about the actual study. The original news article only describes construct validity, but this was found to be very minimal and not very detailed. Some quotes and material from the original news article was kept the same, but most of the content was deleted, and new information was added to allow the rewritten article to be thorough and detailed, and easier for the reader to understand.
The title of the news article, “Study Examines How Human Brain Adapts to Self-Serving Dishonesty”, was kept the same in the rewritten article. This is because it was found to appropriately describe the research study. The opening quote of the news article was also kept the same because it was found to be appropriate and important to the introduction of the article. The article did not previously describe the goals or methodology of the study appropriately. This was added in to the rewritten news article. It is very important that the readers of the article are aware of how many participants there were in the study, and how the study was
…show more content…
Instead of just using random quotes from the research article, the article was rewritten to include details about the results of the study and how they can be analyzed. Sometimes it can be difficult to determine which information is essential to the reader of the news article, and which information does not need to be included. It is important to find this balance. If too much information is presented in the news article, the reader can lose interest in the information that is being presented, but if too little information is presented, it might be tough for the reader to understand the research study and its