Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the compromise of 1850
Interpretations of the compromise of 1850
Interpretations of the compromise of 1850
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Big Compromises During the mid-1850’s there was this compromise called the Missouri compromise, which was something that led to temporarily ending the slave debate. Then there is the Kansas- Nebraska act. This allowed slavery in the Northern Territories. In the 1800’s there was this thing called the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.
The Compromise of 1877 was brought to attention recently, shortly after the Presidential Election of 1876. It called to resolve the disputed 1876 presidential elections in the United States. This was supposedly a deal to make it so Rutherford Hayes, the Republican Party candidate running for president, could become president. The Democrats would also become powerful in the governments within the South. Having Hayes, when he would become president, promise to allow troops to be pulled out of the rebelling states and slave states out of the South, it would the Democrats to become just that.
As a result of the Compromise of 1850, which defused the quarrel between the free Northern States and the slave Southern States, the territories acquired during the Mexican-American War were determined to be free, slave, or dependent upon the principle of popular sovereignty. California was admitted as a free state, the Utah and New Mexico territories were to be determined by popular sovereignty, the Texas-New Mexico boundary was solidified, and slave trade was terminated in Washington, D.C., making it easier for the South to recover fugitive slaves (Document A). As stated by an Anonymous Georgian in “Plain Words for the North,” everything the South could ask for was embodied in the Constitution, but two provisions were necessary to the South’s success – “the recognition of slavery where the people choose it and the remedy for fugitive slaves” (Document B). The North saw popular sovereignty and the remedy of fugitive slaves as deceptive encouragement of immoral and unconstitutional activity (Document C). But, southerners viewed the North’s assumption of ownership to be unconstitutional.
With the nation facing the potential threat of disunion over the passage of the Compromise of 1850, Georgia, in a special state convention, adopted a proclamation called the Georgia Platform. The act was instrumental in averting a national crisis. Slavery had been at the core of sectional tensions between the North and South. New territorial gains, westward expansion, and the hardening of regional attitudes toward the spread of slavery provoked a potential crisis of the Union, which in many ways portended the tragic events of the 1860s. In 1850, however, compromise and conciliation remained viable alternatives to secession and war.
As the 1800s began, the belief of Manifest Destiny rose throughout the United States. Previously, because of Thomas Jefferson, the United States gained land from the Louisiana Purchase. This doubled the size of the United States, allowing America to grow westward. This westward land provided food for America, whereas the North provided manufactured goods and the South provided cash crops, such as cotton. The West and North soon became very interconnected through similar economies and views.
The Compromise of 1850 did not give a solution to slavery, either. Henry Clay said that California should enter the union as a free state, then the rest of the states would have no limits on slavery. Also trading in Washington, D.C. would be banned. The slavery itself would not be banned. People objected against this.
When the Constitution was created to establish national unity, the makers did not outline the subject that would plague a source of discord between the North and South, slavery. Whereas, the Constitution under loose and strict interpretations manifested the divide between the union and confederacy. In consideration to the South heavily relying on “Cotton King,” as their source of income, slavery had become relied upon within their society, and they were unwilling to relinquish their labor force. This eventually brought the South into a defensive stance over “slave labor” as the North began to visibly oppose the injustice after Uncle Tom’s Cabin became a phenomena throughout the North and abroad depicting slave life. Therefore, the tension
The north compromises but later the civil war solves the problem of slavery in United States. This war decision is the key for the independence of
In the 1800s, there was problems in the United States that could have changed the way our country is today. There was a time where the United States was separated into two different parts. The country was divided into two different parts because the Southern states started to secede from the Union. The country was divided into the North and the South, and there were many reasons that led to the Southern states seceding from the Union. The north and the south had different opinions on things, and they went about things in different ways.
The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.
The point at which the Civil War became seemingly unstoppable can be traced to the Compromise of 1850, its passage known as the Fugitive Slave Act. This legislation marked a significant intensification of tensions between the North and South. Prior to the Compromise of 1850, the nation had experienced a series of political compromises attempting to maintain the balance between free and slave states. However, the Fugitive Slave Act incited widespread opposition in the North and galvanized abolitionist sentiment. The Compromise of 1850 also set the stage for future legislation and decisions that would further divide the country.
This directly violated the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which required all escaped slaves to be returned to their masters. The North was willing to go to any lengths in order to provide freedom for slaves. The North was not willing to settle for anything but liberty, leading to further conflict between the North and the South. This resulted in an inability to compromise the issue of
By 1860, the United States of America had turned into the Divided States of America. The once unified country had let slavery divide the country by a thin red line. A thin red line of blood being shed by slaves and those fighting for what they believe to be right and moral. This thin red line caused those of the North and South to lose sight of the purpose of the United States; a country that was created as a haven for all, where anyone could be viewed with equality, and freedom was tangible for every person. Rather the United States began to create social classes that were next to impossible to discard.
This Compromise benefited the South and with the increasing participation in the government, they set a goal to harm the Freedmen. According to the American Journey, “By the 1890s, segregation, or the separation of the races had become a common feature of the South... The facilities were separate but in no way equal. Southern states spent much more money on schools and other facilities for whites than for African Americans” As seen in the quote above, The South did
Our country is on the verge of disaster today. Provincial parties are seeking blood from one another. By being the kings of these radicals, Mr. Buchanan and Mr. Fremont do absolutely nothing but intensify the problem, which threatens to burst out into civil war. During my last serving as President, this very same argument over slavery loomed over us.