Rebellion cannot exist without the feeling that somewhere, in some way, you are justified (Albert Camus). When a group rebels against the established government, one can expect many deaths. In most of these cases, the leaders of the government are corrupt and the treacherous deeds of the rebels are considered righteous by the people. But what if the ruler was kind and just? Would the people allow the rebels to betray their leader? This scenario took place in the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. Julius Caesar, an excellent leader of Rome during 44 BC, was struck down by the blade of aristocratic conspirators, led by Marcus Brutus and Cassius Longinus. The plebeians of Rome were outraged, rightly so, as Julius Caesar was an exceptional leader. …show more content…
When the poor of the city cried, Caesar wept with them (Act III, scene ii, line 90). He toiled to give sustenance to Rome as he brought many captives to the city and gave their ransom money to the government, instead of to his own funds as many other Roman leaders of the time would have done; hence, bringing wealth and fortune into the city (Act III, scene ii, lines 87-88). Caesar wanted nothing more than to bring Rome to its highest glory and to be a servant of the city. He proves this by turning down the crown of Rome three