Political revolutions recur throughout history when governments don’t meet the needs of their people. During revolutions, there is usually a violent phase. The Reign of Terror and the Dirty War were times of horror, terror, and government reforms. While both revolutions were times of terror and reform, and though there were similarities, there were still many differences. During both the Reign of Terror and the Dirty War, there were many citizen deaths, most for no reason, Yet both revolutions started for or with completely different goals. Both the Reign of Terror and the Dirty War started with the death of their respective leaders. The Reign of Terror began with the death of Louis XIV, and the Dirty War began with the death of Juan Peron. In both, most of the people taken captive and killed were not dangerous people, but mostly innocent people. During the Reign of Terror, it was the normal innocent people who were taken and not the aristocrats. In the …show more content…
This idea was cemented when Robespierre called for another purge. The other members of the committee began to feel threatened, as one member of the committee stated "It is time to tell the whole truth. One man alone is paralyzing the will of the Convention, and that man is Robespierre" ("The Reign of Terror - HistoryWiz French Revolution."). The Jacobins had had enough, the committee arrested and killed Robespierre the next day. The government never declared victory or thought they had won.The Dirty War ended when the government, trying to regain the trust and happiness of the people, tried to reclaim a territory they had lost to England (they thought it would be an easy victory). They were defeated. The official end was when a citizen government came in and took over. The government declared victory after they took away all the guerilla warfare.They achieved this through kidnappings,