Because of the ambiguity of Kuhn’s paradigm and scientific revolution, many scholars attempted to clarify its notion and definition for the better understanding (Kvasz, 2014; Tuboly, 2017). Thus, Kvasz (2014) categorized the scientific revolutions based on the Kuhnian principle into four types: idealizations, re-coding, relativizations, and re-formulations. The idealization is defined as “the change of ideal objects” (Kvasz, 2014, p.81); while the re-coding is the creation of the linguistic framework of idealitiesthe paradigm of representation (Kvasz, 2014). The relativization of scientific revolution represent the common unities and differences inside the framework of previous re-codingthe paradigm of reification, whereas the re-formulation is a change of formulation terms or language of science (Kvasz, 2014). To consider a portion of these four types of revolution, re-formulation is the smallest magnitude; whilst idealization is the greatest one (Kvasz, 2014). …show more content…
Even though nurses are familiar with the terms of nursing science, it seems that no one can provide clear and concise its definition because the definition of nursing science is an enigma (Barrett, 2002). Moreover, Barrett (2017) stated that “communicating a clear definition of nursing science to the public will change how society thinks about nursing, and that change will reverberate” (p.129). Therefore, before thinking about the revolution of nursing science, it is necessary that nurses should understand the definition of nursing science. Surprisingly, only few definitions of nursing science were presented in the literature (Barrett, 2002). All of them were published in the Nursing Science Quarterly Journal. To begin with the definitions in 1997, some nursing scholars were asked to define the definitions of nursing science in which they expressed it in different perspectives. Daly (1997) defined nursing science as