ipl-logo

Republican Governments Were Responsible For The Boom In The 1920s Research Paper

925 Words4 Pages

The ‘Republican governments were responsible for the boom in the 1920s’ How far do you agree? During the 1920s, America experienced a period of economic prosperity known as the ‘boom’. The most important cause for this boom was the Republican governments leading the country at the time, this is shown through the party’s policies such as Laissez-Faire and low taxation that helped America thrive. The idea of Laissez-Faire was that the government should interfere with the public’s daily lives as little as possible, leaving the business people alone to do their jobs. The government believed that the public would work harder without aid, therefore industries would prosper. Low taxation was also a key factor in the boom, by 1928, only 2% of taxpayers …show more content…

One example of this is Warren Harding’s idea of ‘isolationism’, a type of foreign policy which involves little to no trade or communication with other countries, instead focusing on America’s own industries and interstate trade. Harding’s goal for isolationism was for America to build massive industries, without having to worry about international competition. This was a huge success in strengthening American industry and economy, and was a large contributing cause to the boom, shown by how America alone was able to produce over 40 million tonnes of steel in 1925, compared to Germany’s 15 million tonnes. As well as this, President Herbert Hoover also spread the idea of ‘Rugged Individualism’, meaning that American citizens should look after themselves, without having to rely on help from the government, Hoover believed that aid would encourage laziness, and wanted Americans to be resilient so that they worked harder, increasing the power of industries, in order for the country to prosper. These morals created a strong sense of patriotism in Americans, encouraging them to do as their presidents said, which was able to lead to economic

Show More
Related
943 Words | 4 Pages

To what extent and for what reasons did the policies of the federal government from 1865 to 1900 violate the principles of laissez faire, which advocated minimal government intervention in the economy? Laissez faire, or to let do, originated as a French economic system where the government is intended to have minimal intervention in the economy. Government intervention in the American economy had long been frowned upon, except for when it became deemed as necessary in order to control the powerful monopolies and regulate commerce between the states. Those who benefitted particularly well off the laissez faire system, men like Jay Gould, were very against government intervention as it would surely cut into profits. The government did not violate

Read More
330 Words | 2 Pages

In the book The Outsiders by S.E Hinton the book and the movie differ because Sandy isn’t ever mentioned throughout the movie, and Darry is a lot less rough in the movie. In the movie Sandy, Sodas ex is never mentioned in the movie as she is in the book. In the book Sodas ex girlfriend is mentioned a couple of times due to her moving and Soda really liking her. However, in the movie it is never brought up about Soda having a girlfriend or even Sandy’s name. On page 174 it states, “When Sandy went to Florida...

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

Hoover understood that not being involved into the lives of the American people worked for Coolidge, if something is going well, there's no need to change it. Until the Great Depression in 1929 he kept that mentality, but something needed to change and was expected of him when the economy was so low. He created the Reconstruction Finance Corp. with the 3 platforms of volunteerism, localism, and rugged-individualism. Describing volunteerism as helping each other out and the need to get involved, localism focused on state governments to make their attempt to fix the problem first rather than the federal government, and rugged-individualism was this new term of growing character and that American culture of fixing things out on their own and after getting through the rough and tough, they will succeed. “Economic depression cannot be cured by legislative action or executive pronouncement “ (DOC C).

Read More
134 Words | 1 Pages

Even though Hoover wasn’t re-elected after 1933, his failed attempt at laissez-faire still affected the American people. An example of this is Roosevelt’s attempt at counteracting Hoover’s Rugged individualism. During Roosevelt’s campaign he promised a ‘New Deal’ for the American people, where, especially in comparison to Hoover’s: ‘laissev-faire’, the US government would be more involved with businesses and the country’s citizens. Summed up, the ‘New Deal’ was about doing everything to keep the country from disaster.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

The wealth during the 1920s left Americans unprepared for the economic depression they would face in the 1930s. The Great Depression occurred because of overproduction by farmers and factories, consumption of goods decreased, uneven distribution of wealth, and overexpansion of credit. Hoover was president when the depression first began, and he maintained the government’s laissez-faire attitude in the economy. However, after the election of FDR in 1932, his many alphabet soup programs in his first one hundred days in office addressed the nation’s need for change.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

History CA – Part C In 1929 the US experienced a huge change in economy known as the ‘Wall Street Crash’, this was the largest economic bust in American history. During the time of the economic depression, the president was Herbert Hoover, a republican who strongly believed in laissez faire, which essentially meant that he believed that things should be left alone, and not interfered with. Hoover believed that things would sort themselves out by themselves within a matter of time. For the citizens of the United States, this was seen as Hoover being useless, and not even attempting to make a change to the society, which was in ruins.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

At the end of the 1920s, after World War I, the United States was an industrial giant boasting the largest economy in the world. Upon accepting the Republican Presidential nomination, Herbert Hoover famously stated “We in America today are nearer to the final triumph over poverty than ever before in the history of any land.” But within months after his inauguration, the stock market crashed. At the time, the American economy were already flawed by disparity in the distribution of wealth and a weak banking system, and within months, the nation’s economy started to spiral downward into the greatest depression it has ever seen.

Read More
1120 Words | 5 Pages

The period from the 1920s to the 1950s witnessed a transformation in the power and scope of the federal government in the United States. Significant events such as the Great Depression, the New Deal, and World War II greatly impacted how much power the government could wield without causing a revolt. By examining the federal government's economic, political, and social policies formed from the 1920s-1950s, it can be shown that a bad precedent was set for the expectations of government intervention. The 1920s began with a sense of optimism and prosperity following the end of World War I. Citizens could spend more money and live a new lifestyle due to increased automobile production, household appliances, film, and radio (American Yawp). However,

Read More
815 Words | 4 Pages

Monroe’s presidency was emblematic of national harmony. Coined “the Era of Good Feelings” by the Columbian Centinel, the surge of national pride from the War of 1812 and the death of the Federalist party created a sense of unity in America. The government, for one of the first times in its young history, devoted itself to the nation rather than to divided regions. During this period, nationalism manifested in several forms, including economic, judicial, and diplomatic nationalism. Each facet of nationalism served to unify the country as a whole and mold it into a modern society.

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn vs. The Adventures of Huck Finn Have you ever had a friend that would risk their freedom for your safety and well-being? This situation occurs in the book, “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” written by Mark Twain. The main character named Huck experiences this feeling with his runaway slave friend named Jim. Jim is considered a runaway because he belongs to a women named Mrs Watson. Huck has an issue with this because he comes from a very civilized branch of family, and would be frowned upon to be helping a slave become free.

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

Many of Hoover’s policies favored big businesses and he believed that the growth of the economy depended on increasing capital given to big businesses would combat the depression, which is also known as the Trickle Down economics. If the government aided big businesses then their investments and success would “trickle-down” to the working class, this improving and expanding the economy (Doc 5). Many people criticized Hoover and his policies for not helping the needy. He refused to provide federal relief programs to help unemployed since he thought people would not be motivated to work if the government aided them (OI).As conditions worsened, makeshift homes popped up all over America and were nicknamed “Hoovervilles”, after Herbert Hoover. Hoover believed that that individual initiative and big businesses would solve the problems of the depression and that the economy would recover on its own (OI).

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

The Great Depression of the 1930s marked one of the darkest periods in American history, with widespread unemployment, economic hardship, and social distress. In response to this crisis, President Franklin D. Roosevelt introduced the New Deal, a series of programs and reforms aimed at stabilizing the economy and providing relief to the American people. The New Deal represented a significant departure from past approaches to governance, particularly in terms of the federal government's role in ensuring economic stability and prosperity. Prior to the New Deal, the prevailing philosophy held that the government should play a limited role in economic affairs, with a focus on maintaining a laissez-faire approach to the economy. However, the severity of the Great Depression challenged this notion, leading to a reevaluation of the government's

Read More
146 Words | 1 Pages

Herbert Hoover’s (Between 1929 and 1933) interpretation of the laissez-faire policy meant the US government wasn’t as involved in the lives of the country’s citizens and businesses as previously. They believed the poor and the homeless to be at a moral disadvantage if they received aid from the government, as it took away their self-reliance. They also refused to assist businesses or the banks; all of which help shape a country. Hoover’s policy (which he later dubbed ‘Rugged Individualism’) was later realised to not be as good of an idea as he previously thought, especially after the crippling effects of the Wall Street Crash/ Great depression in 1929 following Hoover’s election into the White House.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

More Americans bought homes, home furnishings, appliances, and automobiles. Increased spending on goods led to a rise in government spending on local infrastructure so that roads, sidewalks, and water and sewage services were all being funded by the government. In the journal article “What Caused the Great Depression?” by Jean Caldwell and Timothy G. O’Driscoll, the authors highlight that, “Spending by consumers, business firms, and state and local governments created plentiful, high-paying jobs.” As is said, what goes up, must come down, and that is exactly what happened in the business cycle. During the late 1920s, demand was decreasing, and by the summer of 1929, total spending in the American economy was also decreasing.

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

“Government was considered the best which does the least as per laissez-faire. Laissez-Faire is an economic theory and policy that promotes a minimal to nonexistent amount of government interference and intervention into the private business sector. The laissez-faire school of thought occupies one extreme on the spectrum of levels of government regulation of the free market. Proponents of the theory or model believe that the government not only should not interfere with everyday dealing of supply and demand, but that it should be in a sense, entirely separated from the business

Read More

More about Republican Governments Were Responsible For The Boom In The 1920s Research Paper

Open Document