Response to the Communist Manifesto Despised by capitalists, admired by socialists, whether read or not, the Communist Manifesto is a classic example of literature that creates fierce opinions in people. Written by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels and published in the mid-nineteenth century before the revolutions of 1848, the Manifesto was considered a rallying cry to the oppressed workers of the world to rise up and overthrow their oppressors in order to create a better society. Over the years, the Manifesto has been published in many languages and several editions. Even though Marx and Engels are credited with the creation of this document, the most recent edition of the Manifesto is considered to be penned by Marx exclusively. Taking a dialectic …show more content…
The bourgeoisie is the modern capitalist class, while the proletarian is the class of working laborers. Marx’s view of the bourgeoisie was particularly one-sided. He believed that the bourgeoisie only ambition was acquire wealth and power through the means of production. Also he believed that the bourgeoisie would exploit any and all resources at his disposal which included the labor class of the proletarian. Marx view the proletarian as the creation of the bourgeoisie. They are one of the elements of the means of production that the bourgeoisie have built their power on. Since they were one of the means of production, Marx believed the proletarian were stripped of the identity and purpose for a work-man’s wage. As a result, Marx considered them as slaves of the bourgeoisie. Hence, the only way to cast off this slave status of exploitation, was for the proletariat to rebel and destroy the bourgeois mean of production and create a better society from the ashes of bourgeoisie. Contrary to Marx, E.P. Thompson, who also wrote about the exploitation of the working class in Lancashire, England established that the bourgeoisie did not create the proletarian. These laborers where already around before the Industrial Revolution began as free-born Englishmen. So only the proletarian’s purpose and work status