ipl-logo

Communist Manifesto, By Karl Marx

1018 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Relevance of karl marx on the theory of alienation

Before the industrial revolution, the working class people were able to own their work, for example, a baker would have control on what kind of bread to produce, how to produce it and ultimately they were in charge of their working hours. Hence they were able to reach their full human potential. Marx called this the “species essence”. He believed that work fulfils our species essence because it allows us to be creative and hence flourish in society. But under a capitalist system Marx acknowledged 2 social classes which had existed, the bourgeoisie (those who owned the means of production and profit) and proletariat (the working class/laborers). The problem for Marx was that the proletariat were not able express their full humanness under a capitalist system, as the bourgeoisie owned the means of production and the wealth. The proletariat were not able to express their full potential because they did not have the capability to invest in mass production, only the bourgeoisie had the means to do this. This is supported in the Marx’s Manifesto of the communist party: “the bourgeois domination of society denies all working people the full fruit of their labor and genuine flowering of national culture.” This indicates that the proletariat become too isolated to reach their full potential and …show more content…

With relates to Marx theory of alienation, the majority of workers who were in the process of the production of luxury cars cannot afford it. Hence, these workers are satisfying the needs of others rather than themselves. Cox argued: “workers produce cash crops for the market when they are malnourished, build houses in which they will never live, make cars they can never buy.” This argument supports Marx’s theory of alienation as it tells us that workers produce goods which they can never afford, but ultimately the product is sold at the commercial value and so it’s not for their use, but for others

Show More
Related
858 Words | 4 Pages

Marx argued that there are two classes of people that exist in society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie refer to the upper class that own the means of production and whose central concern is the value of property. On the other hand, the proletariat describes the working class wageworkers in a capitalist society. Marx argued that the bourgeoisie simply exploited the proletariat, and the physical labor produced by the proletariat generated more wealth for the capitalist, leaving laborers under payed and machine-like. During this process, Marx believed that through this system of mass production, laborers were stripped of individual imagination and as a result, left individuals feeling alienated to their own emotions and erotic feelings in order to maximize production and wealth.

Read More
192 Words | 1 Pages

In The Communist Manifesto, Marx refers to the "proletariat" or the working class as the group with the most "class struggle". Marx defines the classes as 1) bourgeois, the "capitalists" who own the social production and employ the labor of others; and 2) proletariat, who sell their labor power to make a living but don 't own their own production. Marx argues that the wealth and prosperity of the bourgeois depends on the proletariat 's production of labor. Their products are sold for a larger value that the labor itself thus exploiting the working class and allowing the bourgeois to control the production. Marx states that the nature of these classes will inevitably result in conflict and revolution.

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

Marx believed that the Bourgeoisie class exploited the Proletariats and used their labor for capital gain. In fact, at one point, the goods and services

Read More
1189 Words | 5 Pages

These two groups were constantly at odds, particularly because the bourgeoisie possessed the income of production. Because of this longstanding system of production and labor, it was natural that there would be a working class that would be continuously be oppressed by a super visional upper class. As a result of their ownership of the means of production these upper class were also given special positions within government and thus two systems, labor and government, were tarnished by class inequity. The way to attempt to even out the system and then come up with a way to end the upper class owning the means of production could there be fairness in terms of labor. On the other hand, Marx saw that labor itself was where the power of the proletariat was.

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

Fermelita Borre AB1213 Rochelle Igot Philosophical Research Paper What is Alienation? In this paper, we will evaluate alienation and its premises as presented in “Estranged Labor” by Karl Marx. Although the entirety of the arguments he presented in his manuscript were substantial, there was a flaw in one of the arguments he presented in the types of of alienation, the estrangement of the worker from the activity of production.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

They are one of the elements of the means of production that the bourgeoisie have built their power on. Since they were one of the means of production, Marx believed the proletarian were stripped of the identity and purpose for a work-man’s wage. As a result, Marx considered them as slaves of the bourgeoisie. Hence, the only way to cast off this slave status of exploitation, was for the proletariat to rebel and destroy the bourgeois mean of production and create a better society from the ashes of bourgeoisie. Contrary to Marx, E.P. Thompson, who also wrote about the exploitation of the working class in Lancashire, England established that the bourgeoisie did not create the proletarian.

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

The way Marx’s explains class is the bourgeoisie, the rich/noble, and the proletariat are, the poor/working class, and for example, these are the factory owners and wage laborers that contribute to the alienation of a human being. The bourgeoisie look for wage workers to pay cheaply to produce commodities and profit, and worker to work quickly and cheaply. In turn, the wage-worker providing their labor has to work for a living, but also to produce money for the bourgeoisie to increase their margin of capita. To make a profit, leads to paying workers low wages (hourly/monthly/yearly), “The worker becomes poorer the richer is his production, the more it increases in power and scope,” (pg. 4). Marx argues that the more time the wage worker invests producing products the poorer the worker becomes in money and as a

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

When Karl Marx speaks about the alienation of the worker from their product, he concludes that the workers or the consumers do not determine how the product is designed or produced; it is the capitalist class who is accommodating the workers labor. Marx further explains that not only are the workers limited from benefiting from the products that they produce, there work is more like as an activity. Seeing work as an activity is just about seeing how much the capitalist can squeeze out of the worker to produce products. Therefore, making the products more of a commodity. Then, the capitalist gets the full control of the workers, the

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

In other words, the capitalists benefit most from this system. The result of this was often alienated labor, which is one of Marx and Engels’ main critiques of capitalism. Marx explains, “It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine

Read More
1216 Words | 5 Pages

All four types of alienation still remain in today’s society. It is because the creation of the artists, the products of the artisans, and the services of the workers have been taken away from all the workers in the end as well as the workers are exhausted at the end of the day by doing things that they have no interests. Most of the people in the world today live in capitalism, and it is difficult to abolish the system immediately in order to get rid of alienation. Therefore, they need to cope with this situation to make the most out of it for their satisfaction of the work as well as of the establishment of a better relationship with other workers and within their

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

The proletariats are the wage earners or the labour class, in a capitalist society the proletarians don’t have much wealth, and their main asset is their labour power. The bourgeoisie is the class that owns the means of production, their class interest lies in the value of property and the preservation of capital, and this ensures their perpetual economic supremacy in society. According to Marx, in the capitalist mode of production, a worker slowly loses the power to decide upon his or her life and destiny, they lose their Gattungswesen (“species-essence”), and this is a consequence of living in a socially stratified society, where human beings become a mechanistic part of a social class. Even though human beings are self-conscious and autonomous, in a capitalist society they are nothing but an economic entity whose acts are dictated by the bourgeoisie, with the aim

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

Marx believed that the current capitalist society is separated into two classes, the Proletariat society, and Bourgeois society. The Proletarians, as perceived by Marx, are part of the working class that only possess one significant material value, that is the ability to work, or labour power. The Bourgeoise, on the other hand, is the societal class that owns the means of production and hence rule over the Proletarians. As I quote from Marx’s book, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (Marx and Engels, 1988, p. 473)

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

According to Edwards et al. (2006) Marx thought that within capitalism there would be an increased divide between the bourgeoisie class and the proletariat class in the future. The proletariats are lower of the two classes, the people who have to work for wages in order to survive. The bourgeoisie are the people in society who controlled and owned the means of production in a capitalist system.

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

Writings of Karl Marx had formed the theoretical basis for communism and the continual debate against capitalism. Marx understood capitalism to be a system in which the means of production are privately owned and profit is generated by the sale of the proletariat’s labour. He considered it to be an unfair exploitation of hard work with alienated social interactions and purpose. I agree with Marx that capitalism is indeed unfair and alienating, because it concentrates wealth within a small group of people by exploiting the surplus value of workers’ labour, and creates an alienated workforce. Hence, this essay will first discuss the relevance of Marx’s perception of capitalism as an alienating and unfair system for the contemporary world, before examining the potential of governments to influence the extent of alienation and unfairness that occurs.

Read More
1140 Words | 5 Pages

Capitalism, according to Karl Marx is divided into two major social classes: the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie, which is the minority of the class system, own the means of production such as land, machinery, factories and raw materials whereas the Proletariat, which is the majority of the class system, having no means of their own production and have to work to earn wage for a living. Karl Marx has his own theory that history is made up by class struggle which he mentioned in his book – Manifesto of the Communist Party: “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (Marx and Engels, 1848) and had predicted that the Proletariat would lead a revolution to overthrow the Bourgeoisie. Karl Marx believed that there will be intrinsic conflict like exploitation, alienation of labour and commodity fetishism between both of the classes.

Read More

More about Communist Manifesto, By Karl Marx

Related Topics

Open Document