Resurrecting Chivalry In Modern Society

Resurrecting Chivalry Everyone has different opinions on chivalry in medieval and modern society, and whether or not those ideals should be resurrected. I personally believe that chivalry as a whole is dead, but also that there are some valuable aspects worth reviving. Rather, chivalry in our modern times should be resurrected and redefined as "a code of ideals in which men and women are equally flattered, and mutually respect each other." For one, chivalry began with pure intentions, so I believe bringing it back is a good idea. For another, this redefinition ensures gender equality. Lastly, implementing this new and modern take on the old practice of chivalry could greatly enhance the quality of life of everyone. Overall, I believe chivalry

For example, the well known phrase, "ladies first" shows that women are still flattered in some ways, but men aren't necessarily inclined to let the woman go first in every situation. Because of this lack of social obligation, I believe chivalry is dead in our society. However, I believe it should be resurrected because the historical ideals were pure. According to the article, "...the chivalry ideal...were never about putting women down...[it] was about respecting and aggrandizing women, and recognizing that their attention was worth seeking, competing for, and holding'" (Smith). This excerpt indicates to me that chivalry was intended to be a practice built on virtuous and respectful deeds. However, because chivalry portrays women in need of special attention, I also agree with the feministic point of view that argues that chivalry views women in need of "saving." Because it started as a good thing, I also believe chivalry, in a more equal way, should be

The article states, "Chivalrous behavior is benevolent because it flatters women and leads to their preferential treatment. But it is sexist because it relies on the 'gendered premise' that women are weak and in need of protection while men are strong" (Smith). I agree with the statement that chivalry somewhat portrays women as weak and needing of extra, special treatment. If chivalry was redefined as "a code of ideals in which men and women are equally flattered, and mutually respect each other," there would be no sexist treatment, and both men and women alike would benefit from the benevolence of chivalry. This new definition of chivalry would eliminate any accusations of being sexist. The resurrection of these new chivalrous ideals in our society today could greatly improve our quality of life. For instance, the devoted group of women at Arizona State University who are encouraging "gentlemanly behavior and chivalry..." (Smith) has helped spread these ideals on a more national scale. They reward deeds such as holding doors for women, which increases acts of kindness in the world. If men and women had a mutual understanding of these chivalrous deeds, the world would be a much happier place. Increasing the civility and respect between the sexes would overall have a great impact on